Skip to main content
Press slash or control plus K to focus the search. Use the arrow keys to navigate results and press enter to open a threat.
Reconnecting to live updates…

CVE-2026-31830: CWE-252: Unchecked Return Value in sigstore sigstore-ruby

0
High
VulnerabilityCVE-2026-31830cvecve-2026-31830cwe-252
Published: Tue Mar 10 2026 (03/10/2026, 21:46:02 UTC)
Source: CVE Database V5
Vendor/Project: sigstore
Product: sigstore-ruby

Description

CVE-2026-31830 is a high-severity vulnerability in sigstore-ruby versions prior to 0. 2. 3 where the verification function fails to properly propagate verification failures when artifact digests do not match the attested in-toto subject. This flaw causes DSSE bundles containing in-toto statements to incorrectly return verification success even if the artifact is tampered with or does not match the attestation. The vulnerability arises from unchecked return values (CWE-252) in the verification logic. Exploiting this vulnerability can lead to acceptance of malicious or altered artifacts as valid, undermining supply chain security. No authentication or user interaction is required, and the vulnerability is exploitable remotely. The issue has been fixed in version 0. 2. 3.

AI-Powered Analysis

AILast updated: 03/10/2026, 22:14:25 UTC

Technical Analysis

CVE-2026-31830 affects the sigstore-ruby library, a pure Ruby implementation of the sigstore verify command used for verifying software artifacts and their provenance via in-toto attestations. Prior to version 0.2.3, the method Sigstore::Verifier#verify does not correctly handle the return value from verify_in_toto when the artifact digest does not match the digest specified in the in-toto attestation subject. Specifically, the VerificationFailure returned by verify_in_toto is ignored, causing the verification process to incorrectly return VerificationSuccess. This means that DSSE (Dead Simple Signing Envelope) bundles containing in-toto statements can be accepted as valid even if the artifact has been tampered with or replaced, effectively bypassing the integrity check. The root cause is an unchecked return value vulnerability (CWE-252), where the failure condition is not propagated or handled properly. The vulnerability is remotely exploitable without any privileges or user interaction, making it a significant risk for supply chain security. The flaw was publicly disclosed on March 10, 2026, with a CVSS v3.1 score of 7.5 (high severity), reflecting its impact on integrity and ease of exploitation. The issue was fixed in sigstore-ruby version 0.2.3 by ensuring that verification failures are properly propagated and cause verification to fail as expected.

Potential Impact

The primary impact of this vulnerability is the potential acceptance of malicious or altered software artifacts as legitimate and verified, which undermines the trust model of software supply chains relying on sigstore-ruby for artifact verification. Organizations using vulnerable versions may unknowingly deploy compromised software, leading to integrity breaches that can facilitate further attacks such as code injection, backdoors, or unauthorized access. Since sigstore is increasingly adopted for securing software provenance and supply chains, this vulnerability poses a significant risk to software developers, CI/CD pipelines, and downstream consumers globally. The lack of authentication or user interaction required to exploit the vulnerability increases the attack surface. While no known exploits are currently reported in the wild, the high severity and straightforward exploitation mean attackers could develop exploits rapidly. This could lead to widespread supply chain compromises, especially in environments that rely heavily on Ruby-based tooling or integrate sigstore-ruby for verification.

Mitigation Recommendations

To mitigate this vulnerability, organizations should immediately upgrade sigstore-ruby to version 0.2.3 or later, where the issue is fixed. Additionally, users should audit their verification workflows to ensure that verification failures are properly checked and handled, preventing silent acceptance of invalid artifacts. Implementing additional integrity checks or secondary verification mechanisms can provide defense in depth. Monitoring software supply chain logs for anomalies or unexpected verification successes can help detect exploitation attempts. Organizations should also review their dependency management and CI/CD pipelines to confirm no vulnerable versions are in use. Finally, educating developers and security teams about the importance of handling return values and verification results correctly can prevent similar issues in custom tooling.

Pro Console: star threats, build custom feeds, automate alerts via Slack, email & webhooks.Upgrade to Pro

Technical Details

Data Version
5.2
Assigner Short Name
GitHub_M
Date Reserved
2026-03-09T17:41:56.077Z
Cvss Version
3.1
State
PUBLISHED

Threat ID: 69b094562f860ef943cc1904

Added to database: 3/10/2026, 9:59:50 PM

Last enriched: 3/10/2026, 10:14:25 PM

Last updated: 3/10/2026, 11:06:20 PM

Views: 5

Community Reviews

0 reviews

Crowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.

Sort by
Loading community insights…

Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.

Actions

PRO

Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.

Please log in to the Console to use AI analysis features.

Need more coverage?

Upgrade to Pro Console in Console -> Billing for AI refresh and higher limits.

For incident response and remediation, OffSeq services can help resolve threats faster.

Latest Threats

Breach by OffSeqOFFSEQFRIENDS — 25% OFF

Check if your credentials are on the dark web

Instant breach scanning across billions of leaked records. Free tier available.

Scan now
OffSeq TrainingCredly Certified

Lead Pen Test Professional

Technical5-day eLearningPECB Accredited
View courses