VulnerabilityPublished 18 Mar 2026

CVE-2026-32268: craftcms azure-blob · Missing Authorization

Affects craftcms azure-blobSource CVE Database V5

Compare

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 8.7 High : upgrade to 2.1.1 soon.

Data as of 30 Oct 2026, 11:52 UTC

CVSS 4.0 base score

8.7High

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.3% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 29% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.
Patch: Available – fixed in 2.1.1

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Attack Requirements: None
Privileges Required: None
User Interaction: None
Vulnerable system confidentiality: High
Vulnerable system integrity: None
Vulnerable system availability: None
Subsequent system confidentiality: None
Subsequent system integrity: None
Subsequent system availability: None

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable system is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed below, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed “remotely exploitable” and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: The attacker must take no measurable action to exploit the vulnerability. The attack requires no target-specific circumvention to exploit the vulnerability. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable system.
Attack Requirements: None: The successful attack does not depend on the deployment and execution conditions of the vulnerable system. The attacker can expect to be able to reach the vulnerability and execute the exploit under all or most instances of the vulnerability.
Privileges Required: None: The attacker is unauthorized prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files of the vulnerable system to carry out an attack.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without interaction from any human user, other than the attacker.
Vulnerable system confidentiality: High: There is a total loss of confidentiality, resulting in all information within the Vulnerable System being divulged to the attacker. Alternatively, access to only some restricted information is obtained, but the disclosed information presents a direct, serious impact. For example, an attacker steals the administrator's password, or private encryption keys of a web server.
Vulnerable system integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the Subsequent System or all confidentiality impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the Subsequent System or all integrity impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Subsequent System or all availability impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v4.0 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 18 Mar 2026
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponized: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 30 Oct 2026.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponized: A Metasploit exploit module or Exploit-DB entry exists (Metasploit scanner modules do not count), or CISA SSVC or the CVSS exploit maturity reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Upgrade azure-blob and craftcms/azure-blob to 2.1.1.

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
craftcmsazure-blob	Affected >=2.0.0-beta.1 <2.1.1	Fixed in 2.1.1
GitHubcraftcms/azure-blob`pkg:github/craftcms/azure-blob`Other threats	Affected <2.1.1	Fixed in 2.1.1

Check your own hosts for these packages with threat-finder (opens in a new tab), our free open-source scanner.

AI-suggested

Immediately update the Azure Blob Storage plugin for Craft CMS to version 2.1.1 or later, where the authorization checks have been properly implemented.
Review and restrict access to the DefaultController->actionLoadContainerData() endpoint to authenticated and authorized users only.
Implement strict validation and sanitization of error messages returned by Azure Blob Storage to avoid leaking sensitive information.
Monitor web application logs for unusual access patterns to the vulnerable endpoint, especially requests with valid CSRF tokens but no authentication.
Employ Web Application Firewalls (WAFs) to detect and block unauthorized attempts to access sensitive plugin endpoints.
Conduct regular security audits of third-party plugins and their integration points with cloud services to identify missing authorization or authentication controls.
Educate developers and administrators about the risks of missing authorization and the importance of secure coding practices, especially when integrating with cloud services.

Description

The Azure Blob Storage for Craft CMS plugin provides an Azure Blob Storage integration for Craft CMS. In versions on the 2.x branch prior to 2.1.1, unauthenticated users can view a list of buckets the plugin has access to. The `DefaultController->actionLoadContainerData()` endpoint allows unauthenticated users with a valid CSRF token to view a list of buckets that the plugin is allowed to see. Because Azure can return sensitive data in error messages, additional attack vectors are also exposed. Users should update to version 2.1.1 of the plugin to mitigate the issue.

Impact

The primary impact of this vulnerability is the unauthorized disclosure of Azure Blob Storage bucket names and potentially sensitive information contained in error messages. This can lead to significant confidentiality breaches, as attackers can gain insight into the cloud storage architecture and potentially identify targets for further exploitation, such as data exfiltration or privilege escalation. Since the vulnerability requires no authentication and minimal user interaction, it lowers the barrier for attackers to perform reconnaissance. Organizations using Craft CMS with the affected Azure Blob Storage plugin versions risk exposure of sensitive cloud storage resources, which could undermine data security and compliance requirements. Additionally, knowledge of bucket names can assist attackers in crafting more targeted attacks, including phishing or exploiting other misconfigurations. Although availability and integrity impacts are not directly indicated, the information disclosure alone can have severe consequences for organizations relying on Azure Blob Storage for critical data storage.

CWE-862Missing Authorization (opens in a new tab)
Class weaknessLikelihood of exploit: HighCWE Top 25 (2025): #4OWASP Top 10 A01:2025: Broken Access Control (opens in a new tab)
The product does not perform an authorization check when an actor attempts to access a resource or perform an action.
Architecture and Design
Divide the product into anonymous, normal, privileged, and administrative areas. Reduce the attack surface by carefully mapping roles with data and functionality. Use role-based access control (RBAC) to enforce the roles at the appropriate boundaries.
Architecture and Design
Ensure that access control checks are performed related to the business logic. These checks may be different than the access control checks that are applied to more generic resources such as files, connections, processes, memory, and database records.
Architecture and Design · Libraries or Frameworks
Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid.
OWASP Cheat Sheets
Authorization (opens in a new tab)
OWASP ASVS 4.0.3
V8.3.8 (opens in a new tab)
V13.4.2 (opens in a new tab)
V7.2.2 (opens in a new tab)
Attack patterns
Exploitation of Thunderbolt Protection Flaws (opens in a new tab)
From MITRE CWE, MITRE CAPEC and OWASP (Top 10, OpenCRE).

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 18 Mar 2026, 17:42 UTC

WeaknessesCWE-862

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats