Skip to main content
Press slash or control plus K to focus the search. Use the arrow keys to navigate results and press enter to open a threat.
Reconnecting to live updates…

CVE-2026-34832: CWE-639: Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key in Erudika scoold

0
Medium
VulnerabilityCVE-2026-34832cvecve-2026-34832cwe-639
Published: Thu Apr 02 2026 (04/02/2026, 19:08:03 UTC)
Source: CVE Database V5
Vendor/Project: Erudika
Product: scoold

Description

CVE-2026-34832 is an authorization bypass vulnerability in Erudika's Scoold platform versions prior to 1. 66. 1. It allows any authenticated user with low privileges to delete feedback posts belonging to other users by submitting the post ID to a specific deletion endpoint. The flaw arises because the system enforces authentication but fails to verify ownership or moderator/admin rights before allowing deletion. This results in unauthorized integrity impact as users can remove others' feedback without proper authorization. The vulnerability has a CVSS score of 6. 5 (medium severity) and does not require user interaction beyond being logged in. The issue has been patched in version 1. 66.

AI-Powered Analysis

Machine-generated threat intelligence

AILast updated: 04/02/2026, 19:55:33 UTC

Technical Analysis

Erudika's Scoold platform, a knowledge-sharing and Q&A tool for teams, contained an authorization flaw identified as CVE-2026-34832 (CWE-639). This vulnerability exists in versions prior to 1.66.1 and involves the feedback deletion endpoint (POST /feedback/{id}/delete). While the endpoint correctly enforces that the requester is authenticated, it fails to verify whether the authenticated user owns the feedback post or has sufficient privileges (such as moderator or admin rights) to delete it. Consequently, any logged-in user, regardless of privilege level, can delete feedback posts submitted by other users simply by submitting the target post's ID. This leads to unauthorized modification of data, specifically the deletion of user-generated content, impacting data integrity. The vulnerability does not affect confidentiality or availability directly and does not require user interaction beyond authentication. The flaw was confirmed by successfully deleting another user's feedback using a non-privileged account. The issue was addressed and patched in Scoold version 1.66.1. The CVSS v3.1 base score is 6.5, reflecting a medium severity with network attack vector, low attack complexity, and requiring privileges but no user interaction.

Potential Impact

The primary impact of this vulnerability is unauthorized deletion of user feedback posts, which compromises data integrity within the Scoold platform. For organizations relying on Scoold for internal knowledge sharing and collaboration, this could lead to loss of valuable feedback, disruption of communication, and potential mistrust among users. Although the vulnerability does not directly affect confidentiality or availability, the ability for low-privilege users to delete others' content can be exploited for sabotage, harassment, or to cover tracks in insider threat scenarios. In environments where feedback data is critical for decision-making or compliance, such unauthorized deletions could have operational and reputational consequences. Since exploitation requires only authenticated access, any compromised or malicious user account can leverage this flaw. The lack of known exploits in the wild reduces immediate risk but does not eliminate the threat, especially in targeted attacks or insider misuse.

Mitigation Recommendations

Organizations using Scoold versions prior to 1.66.1 should upgrade immediately to version 1.66.1 or later, where the authorization flaw has been patched. Until upgrade is possible, administrators should restrict user registration and monitor feedback deletion activities closely for suspicious behavior. Implementing additional access controls at the application or proxy level to verify ownership or privilege before allowing deletion requests can serve as a temporary mitigation. Logging and alerting on deletion requests, especially those initiated by low-privilege users, can help detect exploitation attempts. Educating users about the importance of account security and monitoring for compromised accounts is also recommended. Finally, conducting regular audits of feedback data integrity can help identify unauthorized deletions promptly.

Pro Console: star threats, build custom feeds, automate alerts via Slack, email & webhooks.Upgrade to Pro

Technical Details

Data Version
5.2
Assigner Short Name
GitHub_M
Date Reserved
2026-03-30T20:52:53.284Z
Cvss Version
3.1
State
PUBLISHED

Threat ID: 69cec5aae6bfc5ba1dfbd81e

Added to database: 4/2/2026, 7:38:18 PM

Last enriched: 4/2/2026, 7:55:33 PM

Last updated: 4/3/2026, 1:47:10 AM

Views: 5

Community Reviews

0 reviews

Crowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.

Sort by
Loading community insights…

Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.

Actions

PRO

Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.

Please log in to the Console to use AI analysis features.

Need more coverage?

Upgrade to Pro Console for AI refresh and higher limits.

For incident response and remediation, OffSeq services can help resolve threats faster.

Latest Threats

Breach by OffSeqOFFSEQFRIENDS — 25% OFF

Check if your credentials are on the dark web

Instant breach scanning across billions of leaked records. Free tier available.

Scan now
OffSeq TrainingCredly Certified

Lead Pen Test Professional

Technical5-day eLearningPECB Accredited
View courses