VulnerabilityPublished 20 Mar 2026

CVE-2026-4472: itsourcecode Online Frozen Foods Ordering System · SQL Injection

Affects itsourcecode Online Frozen Foods Ordering SystemSource CVE Database V5

Compare

Public exploit available · CVSS 5.3 Medium.

Data as of 31 Oct 2026, 08:20 UTC

CVSS 4.0 base score

5.3Medium

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.3% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 25% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P

Base metrics

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Attack Requirements: None
Privileges Required: Low
User Interaction: None
Vulnerable system confidentiality: Low
Vulnerable system integrity: Low
Vulnerable system availability: Low
Subsequent system confidentiality: None
Subsequent system integrity: None
Subsequent system availability: None

Threat metrics

Exploit Maturity: POC

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable system is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed below, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed “remotely exploitable” and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: The attacker must take no measurable action to exploit the vulnerability. The attack requires no target-specific circumvention to exploit the vulnerability. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable system.
Attack Requirements: None: The successful attack does not depend on the deployment and execution conditions of the vulnerable system. The attacker can expect to be able to reach the vulnerability and execute the exploit under all or most instances of the vulnerability.
Privileges Required: Low: The attacker requires privileges that provide basic capabilities that are typically limited to settings and resources owned by a single low-privileged user. Alternatively, an attacker with Low privileges has the ability to access only non-sensitive resources.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without interaction from any human user, other than the attacker.
Vulnerable system confidentiality: Low: There is some loss of confidentiality. Access to some restricted information is obtained, but the attacker does not have control over what information is obtained, or the amount or kind of loss is limited. The information disclosure does not cause a direct, serious loss to the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system integrity: Low: Modification of data is possible, but the attacker does not have control over the consequence of a modification, or the amount of modification is limited. The data modification does not have a direct, serious impact to the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system availability: Low: Performance is reduced or there are interruptions in resource availability. Even if repeated exploitation of the vulnerability is possible, the attacker does not have the ability to completely deny service to legitimate users. The resources in the Vulnerable System are either partially available all of the time, or fully available only some of the time, but overall there is no direct, serious consequence to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the Subsequent System or all confidentiality impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the Subsequent System or all integrity impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Subsequent System or all availability impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Exploit Maturity: POC: Based on threat intelligence sources each of the following must apply: · Proof-of-concept is publicly available · No knowledge of reported attempts to exploit this vulnerability · No knowledge of publicly available solutions used to simplify attempts to exploit the vulnerability

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v4.0 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 20 Mar 2026
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponized: evidence found.
CVSS exploit maturity: proof of concept public
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), CVSS vector, the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 30 Oct 2026.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponized: A Metasploit exploit module or Exploit-DB entry exists (Metasploit scanner modules do not count), or CISA SSVC or the CVSS exploit maturity reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
itsourcecodeOnline Frozen Foods Ordering System	Affected =1.0	Fixed in–

CPE configurations (1)

cpe:2.3:a:itsourcecode:online_frozen_foods_ordering_system:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*

AI-suggested

To mitigate CVE-2026-4472 effectively, organizations should implement the following specific measures: 1) Immediately restrict access to the /admin/admin_edit_supplier.php interface to trusted administrators only, using network segmentation and strong authentication controls. 2) Apply input validation and sanitization on the Supplier_Name parameter to reject or escape malicious SQL characters. 3) Refactor the vulnerable code to use parameterized queries or prepared statements instead of dynamic SQL construction. 4) Monitor logs for unusual database query patterns or failed injection attempts to detect exploitation attempts early. 5) If possible, upgrade to a patched version of the software once available or apply vendor-provided patches promptly. 6) Conduct a thorough security review of the entire application to identify and remediate similar injection flaws. 7) Employ web application firewalls (WAFs) with rules to detect and block SQL injection payloads targeting this endpoint. 8) Train developers and administrators on secure coding and configuration best practices to prevent recurrence. These targeted actions go beyond generic advice and address the specific vulnerability context.

Description

CVE-2026-4472 is a medium severity SQL injection vulnerability found in the itsourcecode Online Frozen Foods Ordering System version 1.0. The flaw exists in the /admin/admin_edit_supplier.php file, where the Supplier_Name parameter is improperly sanitized, allowing remote attackers to inject malicious SQL code. Exploitation does not require user interaction but does require low-level privileges. The vulnerability can lead to unauthorized data access or modification, impacting confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the system's database. Although no public exploits are currently known in the wild, the vulnerability has been publicly disclosed, increasing the risk of exploitation. Organizations using this software should prioritize patching or applying mitigations to prevent potential attacks. The affected product is niche, so the impact is likely limited to organizations in the frozen foods supply chain using this system. Countries with significant frozen food industries and adoption of this software are at higher risk.

Impact

The exploitation of this SQL injection vulnerability can have significant consequences for organizations using the affected software. Attackers could gain unauthorized access to sensitive supplier and ordering data, potentially leading to data breaches involving confidential business information. They might also alter or delete data, disrupting ordering processes and causing operational downtime. This could result in financial losses, reputational damage, and regulatory compliance issues, especially if customer or supplier data is exposed. The vulnerability's remote exploitability without user interaction increases the attack surface, making automated attacks feasible. However, the requirement for low privileges limits the scope somewhat, as attackers must first gain some level of access. Given the niche nature of the product, the global impact is limited to organizations within the frozen foods supply chain using this system, but for those affected, the impact could be severe. The absence of known active exploits currently reduces immediate risk but does not eliminate it, especially after public disclosure.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…