CVE-2026-4515: Code Injection in Foundation Agents MetaGPT
A vulnerability has been found in Foundation Agents MetaGPT up to 0.8.1. This affects the function code_generate of the file metagpt/ext/aflow/scripts/operator.py. The manipulation leads to code injection. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
CVE-2026-4515 identifies a code injection vulnerability in Foundation Agents MetaGPT versions 0.8.0 and 0.8.1, specifically within the code_generate function of the metagpt/ext/aflow/scripts/operator.py file. Code injection vulnerabilities allow attackers to insert and execute arbitrary code within the context of the vulnerable application. This particular flaw can be exploited remotely without requiring user interaction or elevated privileges, indicating that an attacker can trigger the vulnerability over the network with low complexity. The vulnerability arises from insufficient input validation or sanitization in the code_generate function, enabling malicious payloads to be injected and executed. Although the vendor was notified early, no patches or responses have been issued, and no known exploits have been observed in the wild yet. The CVSS 4.0 base score is 5.3 (medium), reflecting moderate impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability, with low attack complexity and no authentication required. This vulnerability could allow attackers to execute arbitrary code, potentially leading to unauthorized data access, modification, or disruption of services running MetaGPT. The lack of vendor response increases the risk of exploitation as attackers may develop exploits independently. Organizations relying on MetaGPT for AI agent orchestration or automation should be aware of this threat and implement mitigations to reduce exposure until a patch is available.
Potential Impact
The impact of CVE-2026-4515 on organizations worldwide can be significant depending on the deployment context of MetaGPT. Successful exploitation allows remote code execution, which can compromise the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of systems running the vulnerable software. This may lead to unauthorized data access, manipulation of AI workflows, or disruption of automated processes relying on MetaGPT. In environments where MetaGPT orchestrates critical AI agents or workflows, attackers could pivot to other internal systems or exfiltrate sensitive information. The medium severity score reflects that while the vulnerability is exploitable remotely without authentication, the impact is somewhat limited by the scope of affected components and the current absence of known exploits. However, the lack of vendor response and patch availability increases the risk of future exploitation. Organizations using MetaGPT in production, especially in sectors such as technology, finance, healthcare, and government, could face operational disruptions or data breaches if this vulnerability is exploited. The threat is amplified in environments with internet-facing MetaGPT instances or weak network segmentation.
Mitigation Recommendations
1. Immediate mitigation should focus on network-level controls: restrict external access to MetaGPT services, especially the code_generate function endpoint, using firewalls or network segmentation to limit exposure. 2. Implement strict input validation and sanitization at the application layer where possible to reduce injection risk, even if a patch is not yet available. 3. Monitor logs and system behavior for unusual code execution patterns or anomalies indicative of exploitation attempts. 4. Employ runtime application self-protection (RASP) or endpoint detection and response (EDR) tools to detect and block suspicious activities related to code injection. 5. Engage with the vendor or community to obtain updates or patches as soon as they become available; consider contributing to or reviewing open-source fixes if applicable. 6. If feasible, temporarily disable or isolate the vulnerable code_generate functionality until a secure version is released. 7. Conduct security awareness and incident response readiness exercises focused on detecting and responding to code injection attacks. 8. Review and harden the overall AI agent orchestration environment to minimize lateral movement and privilege escalation opportunities post-exploitation.
Affected Countries
United States, China, Germany, United Kingdom, Japan, South Korea, France, Canada, Australia, India
CVE-2026-4515: Code Injection in Foundation Agents MetaGPT
Description
A vulnerability has been found in Foundation Agents MetaGPT up to 0.8.1. This affects the function code_generate of the file metagpt/ext/aflow/scripts/operator.py. The manipulation leads to code injection. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.
AI-Powered Analysis
Machine-generated threat intelligence
Technical Analysis
CVE-2026-4515 identifies a code injection vulnerability in Foundation Agents MetaGPT versions 0.8.0 and 0.8.1, specifically within the code_generate function of the metagpt/ext/aflow/scripts/operator.py file. Code injection vulnerabilities allow attackers to insert and execute arbitrary code within the context of the vulnerable application. This particular flaw can be exploited remotely without requiring user interaction or elevated privileges, indicating that an attacker can trigger the vulnerability over the network with low complexity. The vulnerability arises from insufficient input validation or sanitization in the code_generate function, enabling malicious payloads to be injected and executed. Although the vendor was notified early, no patches or responses have been issued, and no known exploits have been observed in the wild yet. The CVSS 4.0 base score is 5.3 (medium), reflecting moderate impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability, with low attack complexity and no authentication required. This vulnerability could allow attackers to execute arbitrary code, potentially leading to unauthorized data access, modification, or disruption of services running MetaGPT. The lack of vendor response increases the risk of exploitation as attackers may develop exploits independently. Organizations relying on MetaGPT for AI agent orchestration or automation should be aware of this threat and implement mitigations to reduce exposure until a patch is available.
Potential Impact
The impact of CVE-2026-4515 on organizations worldwide can be significant depending on the deployment context of MetaGPT. Successful exploitation allows remote code execution, which can compromise the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of systems running the vulnerable software. This may lead to unauthorized data access, manipulation of AI workflows, or disruption of automated processes relying on MetaGPT. In environments where MetaGPT orchestrates critical AI agents or workflows, attackers could pivot to other internal systems or exfiltrate sensitive information. The medium severity score reflects that while the vulnerability is exploitable remotely without authentication, the impact is somewhat limited by the scope of affected components and the current absence of known exploits. However, the lack of vendor response and patch availability increases the risk of future exploitation. Organizations using MetaGPT in production, especially in sectors such as technology, finance, healthcare, and government, could face operational disruptions or data breaches if this vulnerability is exploited. The threat is amplified in environments with internet-facing MetaGPT instances or weak network segmentation.
Mitigation Recommendations
1. Immediate mitigation should focus on network-level controls: restrict external access to MetaGPT services, especially the code_generate function endpoint, using firewalls or network segmentation to limit exposure. 2. Implement strict input validation and sanitization at the application layer where possible to reduce injection risk, even if a patch is not yet available. 3. Monitor logs and system behavior for unusual code execution patterns or anomalies indicative of exploitation attempts. 4. Employ runtime application self-protection (RASP) or endpoint detection and response (EDR) tools to detect and block suspicious activities related to code injection. 5. Engage with the vendor or community to obtain updates or patches as soon as they become available; consider contributing to or reviewing open-source fixes if applicable. 6. If feasible, temporarily disable or isolate the vulnerable code_generate functionality until a secure version is released. 7. Conduct security awareness and incident response readiness exercises focused on detecting and responding to code injection attacks. 8. Review and harden the overall AI agent orchestration environment to minimize lateral movement and privilege escalation opportunities post-exploitation.
Technical Details
- Data Version
- 5.2
- Assigner Short Name
- VulDB
- Date Reserved
- 2026-03-20T14:40:24.899Z
- Cvss Version
- 4.0
- State
- PUBLISHED
Threat ID: 69be84f0f4197a8e3bc20cfc
Added to database: 3/21/2026, 11:45:52 AM
Last enriched: 3/28/2026, 9:21:04 PM
Last updated: 5/5/2026, 4:21:56 PM
Views: 125
Community Reviews
0 reviewsCrowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.
Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.
Actions
Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.
Need more coverage?
Upgrade to Pro Console for AI refresh and higher limits.
For incident response and remediation, OffSeq services can help resolve threats faster.
Latest Threats
Check if your credentials are on the dark web
Instant breach scanning across billions of leaked records. Free tier available.