VulnerabilityPublished 10 Jun 2026

CVE-2026-53474: migration-planner · SQL Injection

Affects migration-plannerSource CVE Database V5

Compare

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 9.6 Critical : upgrade to 0.13.5 as a priority.

Data as of 30 Oct 2026, 11:52 UTC

CVSS 3.1 base score

9.6Critical

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.2% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 22% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.
Patch: Available – fixed in 0.13.5

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Privileges Required: Low
User Interaction: None
Scope: Changed
Confidentiality: High
Integrity: High
Availability: None

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable component is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed 'remotely exploitable' and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable component.
Privileges Required: Low: The attacker is authorized with (i.e., requires) privileges that provide basic user capabilities that could normally affect only settings and files owned by a user. Alternatively, an attacker with Low privileges may have the ability to cause an impact only to non-sensitive resources.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without any interaction from any user.
Scope: Changed: An exploited vulnerability can affect resources beyond the security scope managed by the security authority of the vulnerable component. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are different and managed by different security authorities.
Confidentiality: High: There is total loss of confidentiality, resulting in all resources within the impacted component being divulged to the attacker. Alternatively, access to only some restricted information is obtained, but the disclosed information presents a direct, serious impact.
Integrity: High: There is a total loss of integrity, or a complete loss of protection. For example, the attacker is able to modify any/all files protected by the impacted component. Alternatively, only some files can be modified, but malicious modification would present a direct, serious consequence to the impacted component.
Availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the impacted component.

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v3.1 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 10 Jun 2026
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponized: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 30 Oct 2026.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponized: A Metasploit exploit module or Exploit-DB entry exists (Metasploit scanner modules do not count), or CISA SSVC or the CVSS exploit maturity reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Upgrade migration-planner to 0.13.5.

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
GitHubmigration-planner`pkg:github/migration-planner`Other threats	Affected <0.13.5	Fixed in 0.13.5

Check your own hosts for these packages with threat-finder (opens in a new tab), our free open-source scanner.

AI-suggested

A patch is available for migration-planner that fixes this vulnerability in versions 0.13.5 and later. Users should upgrade to version 0.13.5 or newer to remediate this issue. Red Hat's advisory states that no currently supported Red Hat products are affected, so no action is required for Red Hat customers. For other users of migration-planner, applying the official patch or update is the recommended mitigation.

Description

CVE-2026-53474 is a critical SQL Injection vulnerability in migration-planner that allows a remote authenticated attacker to execute malicious SQL by uploading a specially crafted RVTools .xlsx file. This flaw enables arbitrary file reading on the system, potentially exposing sensitive information such as Kubernetes service account tokens and credentials, which could lead to full compromise of the SaaS environment. The vulnerability affects versions prior to 0.13.5. Red Hat has assessed that this vulnerability does not impact any currently supported Red Hat products. A patch is available to address this issue.

Impact

Successful exploitation allows a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary SQL commands via a crafted spreadsheet upload, leading to arbitrary file reading on the system. This can expose sensitive data such as Kubernetes service account tokens and credentials, potentially resulting in full compromise of the SaaS environment. The vulnerability impacts confidentiality and integrity but does not affect availability. It requires attacker authentication and has low complexity to exploit.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 15 Aug 2026, 17:18 UTC

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats