Skip to main content
VulnerabilityPublished Updated

CVE-2026-90457: CISA Malcolm · Weak Password Hashing

Affects CISA MalcolmSource CVE Database V5

0

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 6.9 Medium : upgrade to v26.06.0 when convenient.

Data as of 27 Oct 2026, 05:11 UTC

CVSS 4.0 base score
6.9Medium
How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.
EPSS
0.08% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 0% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.
Patch
Available – fixed in v26.06.0, 26.06.0
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Exploitation evidence

  1. Disclosed: evidence found.

    CVE published 11 Sep 2026

  2. Detectable: no evidence on record.

    No public nuclei template indexed

  3. Weaponised: no evidence on record.

    No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB

  4. Exploited in the wild: no evidence on record.

    Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation

  5. Observed by OffSeq Mirage: no evidence on record.

    No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 26 Oct 2026.

What to do

Upgrade Malcolm to v26.06.0; Malcolm to 26.06.0.

Affected software

ProductAffectedFixed in
CISAMalcolmAffected
  • <26.06.0
Fixed in
  • v26.06.0
GitHubMalcolmpkg:github/MalcolmOther threatsAffected
  • <26.06.0
Fixed in
  • 26.06.0

Check your own hosts for these packages with threat-finder (opens in a new tab), our free open-source scanner.

AI-suggested

If you cannot patch yet, restrict local file access permissions to prevent unauthorized users from reading the password hash file and secure configuration backups to prevent unauthorized access.

Description

The administrative password is hashed using a comparatively weak, fast algorithm for the credential store backing one authentication path, and the file containing that hash is written with permissions allowing it to be read by any local user. This is inconsistent with a separate, stronger hashing algorithm used for the same password on another authentication path. A party able to read this file, including a local user or a party with access to a configuration backup, could feasibly recover the underlying password through offline computation, compromising the administrative credential across every path that accepts it.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…