VulnerabilityPublished 15 Sep 2026

CVE-2026-91973: vikunja · Improper Restriction of Excessive Authentication Attempts

Affects vikunjaSource CVE Database V5

Compare

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 8.7 High : upgrade to 2.6.0 soon.

Data as of 30 Oct 2026, 20:25 UTC

CVSS 4.0 base score

8.7High

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.6% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 52% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.
Patch: Available – fixed in 2.6.0

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Attack Requirements: None
Privileges Required: None
User Interaction: None
Vulnerable system confidentiality: High
Vulnerable system integrity: None
Vulnerable system availability: None
Subsequent system confidentiality: None
Subsequent system integrity: None
Subsequent system availability: None

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable system is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed below, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed “remotely exploitable” and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: The attacker must take no measurable action to exploit the vulnerability. The attack requires no target-specific circumvention to exploit the vulnerability. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable system.
Attack Requirements: None: The successful attack does not depend on the deployment and execution conditions of the vulnerable system. The attacker can expect to be able to reach the vulnerability and execute the exploit under all or most instances of the vulnerability.
Privileges Required: None: The attacker is unauthorized prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files of the vulnerable system to carry out an attack.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without interaction from any human user, other than the attacker.
Vulnerable system confidentiality: High: There is a total loss of confidentiality, resulting in all information within the Vulnerable System being divulged to the attacker. Alternatively, access to only some restricted information is obtained, but the disclosed information presents a direct, serious impact. For example, an attacker steals the administrator's password, or private encryption keys of a web server.
Vulnerable system integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the Subsequent System or all confidentiality impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the Subsequent System or all integrity impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Subsequent System or all availability impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v4.0 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 15 Sep 2026
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponized: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 30 Oct 2026.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponized: A Metasploit exploit module or Exploit-DB entry exists (Metasploit scanner modules do not count), or CISA SSVC or the CVSS exploit maturity reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Upgrade vikunja and github.com/go-vikunja/vikunja to 2.6.0.

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
go-vikunjavikunja	Affected <2.6.0	Fixed in 2.6.0
Gogithub.com/go-vikunja/vikunja`pkg:golang/github.com/go-vikunja/vikunja`Other threats	Affected <2.6.0	Fixed in 2.6.0

Check your own hosts for these packages with threat-finder (opens in a new tab), our free open-source scanner.

AI-suggested

A fix is available by applying the unconditional pre-auth rate limiting floor to the /dav, /.well-known, and /feeds endpoints, similar to the existing throttling on /api/v1/login. Users should upgrade to version 2.6.0 or later where this fix is implemented. Until then, there is no effective mitigation other than restricting access to these endpoints or deploying external rate limiting controls.

Description

### Summary The `/dav`, `/.well-known`, and `/feeds` groups are registered on the root Echo instance with only BasicAuth and no rate limiter. CalDAV BasicAuth accepts the plain account password, so password guessing over `/dav` is unbounded and never returns 429, while `/api/v1/login` is throttled from the tenth attempt. The only anti-brute-force control on the instance is therefore bypassable. ### Details `pkg/routes/routes.go` (~lines 238-249) registers `/.well-known`, `/dav`, and `/feeds` with `middleware.BasicAuth(...)` and nothing else; `registerCalDavRoutes` adds no limiter. `pkg/routes/caldav/auth.go` (~lines 88-93) falls through to `user.CheckUserCredentials` with the plain account password when no CalDAV token matches. In contrast, `/register`, `/login`, etc. are wrapped by `unauthRateLimit()` — an unconditional 10/min/IP pre-auth floor that ignores `ratelimit.enabled` (default false). TOTP-enabled accounts and bot users are correctly refused, so this targets password-only accounts. ### PoC (verified at runtime against v2.5.0) ``` POST /api/v1/login x25 wrong passwords -> 429 from attempt 2 (throttled) PROPFIND /dav/principals/{user}/ x60 wrong passwords -> 401 x60, 429 x0 GET /feeds/notifications.atom x30 wrong passwords -> 401 x30, 429 x0 PROPFIND /dav/... with correct password -> 207 (proves the 401s are real auth failures) ``` ### Impact The anti-brute-force floor guarding `/login` is entirely absent on `/dav`, `/feeds`, and `/.well-known`, giving an unbounded credential-guessing surface against account passwords. (bcrypt caps throughput to a few guesses/second, but nothing caps the number of attempts.) Reported as an authentication-control bypass, not a DoS. ### Fix Apply the unconditional pre-auth rate-limit floor to the `/dav`, `/.well-known`, and `/feeds` groups.

Impact

The vulnerability allows attackers to bypass the anti-brute-force protections present on the /api/v1/login endpoint by targeting the /dav, /.well-known, and /feeds endpoints which lack rate limiting. This results in an unbounded credential guessing surface against account passwords. Although bcrypt hashing limits guess throughput to a few per second, there is no cap on the number of attempts, increasing the risk of password compromise. The issue is classified as an authentication control bypass and does not directly cause denial of service.

Summary

The vulnerability in go-vikunja vikunja arises because the /dav, /.well-known, and /feeds routes are protected only by BasicAuth without any rate limiting, unlike the /api/v1/login route which enforces a 10 attempts per minute limit per IP. This allows attackers to perform unlimited password guessing attempts against these endpoints, bypassing the anti-brute-force protections. The authentication mechanism accepts plain account passwords, and attempts do not trigger HTTP 429 responses, enabling unbounded credential guessing. The issue affects all versions prior to 2.6.0 and was verified against version 2.5.0. The recommended fix is to apply the unconditional pre-auth rate limiting to these routes to prevent brute-force attacks.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 9 Oct 2026, 22:48 UTC

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats