CVE-2026-94194: CWE-444 Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests ('HTTP Request/Response Smuggling') in elixir-mint mint
Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests ('HTTP Request/Response Smuggling') vulnerability in elixir-mint mint allows a malicious HTTP/1 server to desynchronize an intermediary and the Mint client on a pooled connection, poisoning the responses to subsequent requests that share the connection. message_body/1 in lib/mint/http1.ex selects chunked framing when chunked is the first coding listed in a response's Transfer-Encoding fields. RFC 9112 section 6.3 applies chunked framing only when chunked is the final coding, and otherwise reads the body until the server closes the connection. For a response such as Transfer-Encoding: chunked, gzip, an intermediary that follows the RFC treats every byte up to the close as the body, while Mint ends the body at the zero-length chunk and parses the remaining bytes as the response to the next request on the connection. Mint also keeps the connection open after an HTTP/1.0 response, final or 1xx, that carries Transfer-Encoding and Connection: keep-alive. RFC 9112 section 6.1 requires treating the framing of such a message as faulty and closing the connection after it, so bytes after its chunked body are parsed as the response to the next request in the same way. This issue affects mint: from 0.1.0 before 1.11.0.
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
The vulnerability arises because mint's message_body/1 function incorrectly selects chunked framing when chunked is the first coding in a response's Transfer-Encoding header, contrary to RFC 9112 section 6.3 which requires chunked framing only when chunked is the final coding. For example, a response with Transfer-Encoding: chunked, gzip is handled differently by mint and intermediaries, causing desynchronization. Additionally, mint keeps connections open after HTTP/1.0 responses with Transfer-Encoding and Connection: keep-alive, which RFC 9112 section 6.1 requires to be treated as faulty and closed. These protocol deviations allow a malicious HTTP/1 server to poison responses on pooled connections.
Potential Impact
An attacker controlling an HTTP/1 server can exploit this vulnerability to desynchronize the Mint client and intermediaries on a shared connection, leading to response poisoning of subsequent requests. This can cause incorrect or malicious responses to be delivered to clients, potentially impacting application behavior or security. The CVSS 4.0 score is 6.3 (medium severity), indicating a moderate risk with network attack vector, low complexity, and partial impact on confidentiality and integrity.
Mitigation Recommendations
No explicit patch or official fix is currently documented in the provided data. Patch status is not yet confirmed — check the vendor advisory for current remediation guidance. Until a fix is available, users should consider avoiding use of affected versions (>=0.1.0 <1.11.0) in environments where untrusted HTTP/1 servers are present or where connection pooling is used. Monitoring vendor communications for updates is recommended.
CVE-2026-94194: CWE-444 Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests ('HTTP Request/Response Smuggling') in elixir-mint mint
Description
Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests ('HTTP Request/Response Smuggling') vulnerability in elixir-mint mint allows a malicious HTTP/1 server to desynchronize an intermediary and the Mint client on a pooled connection, poisoning the responses to subsequent requests that share the connection. message_body/1 in lib/mint/http1.ex selects chunked framing when chunked is the first coding listed in a response's Transfer-Encoding fields. RFC 9112 section 6.3 applies chunked framing only when chunked is the final coding, and otherwise reads the body until the server closes the connection. For a response such as Transfer-Encoding: chunked, gzip, an intermediary that follows the RFC treats every byte up to the close as the body, while Mint ends the body at the zero-length chunk and parses the remaining bytes as the response to the next request on the connection. Mint also keeps the connection open after an HTTP/1.0 response, final or 1xx, that carries Transfer-Encoding and Connection: keep-alive. RFC 9112 section 6.1 requires treating the framing of such a message as faulty and closing the connection after it, so bytes after its chunked body are parsed as the response to the next request in the same way. This issue affects mint: from 0.1.0 before 1.11.0.
CVSS v4.0
Score 6.3medium
Affected software
elixir-mint
mint
elixir-mint
mint
cpe:2.3:a:elixir-mint:mint:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*Run on your own infrastructure? Check whether these packages are installed with threat-finder — our free open-source scanner.
Weaknesses
AI-Powered Analysis
Machine-generated threat intelligence
Technical Analysis
The vulnerability arises because mint's message_body/1 function incorrectly selects chunked framing when chunked is the first coding in a response's Transfer-Encoding header, contrary to RFC 9112 section 6.3 which requires chunked framing only when chunked is the final coding. For example, a response with Transfer-Encoding: chunked, gzip is handled differently by mint and intermediaries, causing desynchronization. Additionally, mint keeps connections open after HTTP/1.0 responses with Transfer-Encoding and Connection: keep-alive, which RFC 9112 section 6.1 requires to be treated as faulty and closed. These protocol deviations allow a malicious HTTP/1 server to poison responses on pooled connections.
Potential Impact
An attacker controlling an HTTP/1 server can exploit this vulnerability to desynchronize the Mint client and intermediaries on a shared connection, leading to response poisoning of subsequent requests. This can cause incorrect or malicious responses to be delivered to clients, potentially impacting application behavior or security. The CVSS 4.0 score is 6.3 (medium severity), indicating a moderate risk with network attack vector, low complexity, and partial impact on confidentiality and integrity.
Mitigation Recommendations
No explicit patch or official fix is currently documented in the provided data. Patch status is not yet confirmed — check the vendor advisory for current remediation guidance. Until a fix is available, users should consider avoiding use of affected versions (>=0.1.0 <1.11.0) in environments where untrusted HTTP/1 servers are present or where connection pooling is used. Monitoring vendor communications for updates is recommended.
Technical Details
- Data Version
- 5.2
- Assigner Short Name
- EEF
- Date Reserved
- 2026-09-24T13:45:02.496Z
- Cvss Version
- 4.0
- State
- PUBLISHED
Threat ID: 6aba5091f7a7c5410698ccbe
Added to database: 09/28/2026, 11:33:37 UTC
Last enriched: 09/28/2026, 11:47:54 UTC
Last updated: 09/29/2026, 02:54:26 UTC
Views: 19
Community Reviews
0 reviewsCrowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.
Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.
Actions
Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.
Need more coverage?
Upgrade to Pro Console for AI refresh and higher limits.
For incident response and remediation, OffSeq services can help resolve threats faster.
Latest Threats
Check if your credentials are on the dark web
Instant breach scanning across billions of leaked records. Free tier available.