CVE-2026-126357VulnerabilityPublished 12 Nov 2026

Hono: `mount()` and `app.mount()` can forward a path that bypasses middleware scoped inside the mount prefix

Affects honoSource GCVE Database

Compare

Authoritative record:CVE-2026-126357· Medium 5.3

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 5.3 Medium : upgrade to 4.13.16 when convenient.

Data as of 13 Nov 2026, 00:06 UTC

CVSS 3.1 base score

5.3Medium

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

Thin evidence

One scorer or none

CVSS scores by source
CNA (GitHub_M)	CVSS 3.1	5.3

Patch: Available – fixed in 4.13.16

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Privileges Required: None
User Interaction: None
Scope: Unchanged
Confidentiality: Low
Integrity: None
Availability: None

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable component is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed 'remotely exploitable' and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable component.
Privileges Required: None: The attacker is unauthorized prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files to carry out an attack.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without any interaction from any user.
Scope: Unchanged: An exploited vulnerability can only affect resources managed by the same security authority. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are either the same, or both are managed by the same security authority.
Confidentiality: Low: There is some loss of confidentiality. Access to some restricted information is obtained, but the attacker does not have control over what information is obtained, or the amount or kind of loss is limited. The information disclosure does not cause a direct, serious loss to the impacted component.
Integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the impacted component.
Availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the impacted component.

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v3.1 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 12 Nov 2026
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponized: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 12 Nov 2026.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponized: A Metasploit exploit module or Exploit-DB entry exists (Metasploit scanner modules do not count), or CISA SSVC or the CVSS exploit maturity reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Upgrade hono to 4.13.16.

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
npmhono	Affected <4.13.16	Fixed in 4.13.16

Check your own hosts for these packages with threat-finder (opens in a new tab), our free open-source scanner.

Description

### Summary `mount()` and `app.mount()` remove the mount prefix from the request path and forward the rest to the mounted application. Two mistakes in that step let a crafted request reach a route of the mounted application that the outer application protects with path-scoped middleware, such as an authentication check on `/app/admin/*`. The outer application routes on the original path, so the middleware does not run. ### Details 1. **Dynamic prefix** (all affected versions): for a mount such as `/api/:tenant/*`, the prefix was removed by the length of the route pattern, not of the matched prefix. A request with a longer or shorter first segment is cut in the middle, so `/api/a/xxxxx/admin/secret` reaches the mounted application as `/admin/secret`. 2. **Re-normalization** (since 4.12.21): the forwarded path was built from the decoded request path and assigned to `url.pathname`, which turns a decoded backslash into `/` and collapses `..`. `/app/public%5C..%5Cadmin/secret` reaches the mounted application as `/admin/secret`. The fix removes the prefix segment by segment from the raw pathname, using the matched parameter values for its length. Route patterns that cannot be handled safely now throw: duplicate parameter names and a wildcard inside the last segment such as `/assets*`. A trailing slash in an `app.mount()` prefix no longer removes an extra segment. ### Impact An unauthenticated client can reach a route of a mounted application that the outer application protects with path-scoped middleware. This affects applications that use `mount()` or `app.mount()` and rely on middleware registered on a sub-path inside the mount prefix for authentication or authorization. ### Workarounds Register the authentication middleware inside the mounted application.

CWE-288Authentication Bypass Using an Alternate Path or Channel (opens in a new tab)
Base weaknessOWASP Top 10 A07:2025: Authentication Failures (opens in a new tab)
The product requires authentication, but the product has an alternate path or channel that does not require authentication.
Architecture and Design
Funnel all access through a single choke point to simplify how users can access a resource. For every access, perform a check to determine if the user has permissions to access the resource.
OWASP Cheat Sheets
OWASP Authentication (opens in a new tab)
OWASP ASVS 4.0.3
V1.2.3 (opens in a new tab)
V1.2.2 (opens in a new tab)
V1.2.4 (opens in a new tab)
Attack patterns
Directory Indexing (opens in a new tab)
Exploitation of Thunderbolt Protection Flaws (opens in a new tab)
From MITRE CWE, MITRE CAPEC and OWASP (Top 10, OpenCRE).

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

WeaknessesCWE-288

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats