Skip to main content
CVE-2026-118040VulnerabilityPublished

telerik.documentprocessing · In Progress® Telerik® Document Processing Libraries prior to version 2026.3.1027, improper verification of

Affects telerik.documentprocessingSource GCVE Database

0
Authoritative record:CVE-2026-118040· High 7.5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 7.5 High : upgrade to 2026.3.1027 soon.

Data as of 28 Oct 2026, 16:30 UTC

CVSS 3.1 base score
7.5High
How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.
Patch
Available – fixed in 2026.3.1027
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N

Exploitation evidence

  1. Disclosed: evidence found.

    CVE published 28 Oct 2026

  2. Detectable: no evidence on record.

    No public nuclei template indexed

  3. Weaponised: no evidence on record.

    No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB

  4. Exploited in the wild: no evidence on record.

    Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation

  5. Observed by OffSeq Mirage: no evidence on record.

    No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 26 Oct 2026.

What to do

Upgrade telerik.documentprocessing to 2026.3.1027.

Affected software

ProductAffectedFixed in
NuGettelerik.documentprocessingpkg:nuget/telerik.documentprocessingOther threatsAffected
  • <2026.3.1027
Fixed in
  • 2026.3.1027

Check your own hosts for these packages with threat-finder (opens in a new tab), our free open-source scanner.

AI-suggested

A fixed version 2026.3.1027 or later addresses this vulnerability. Users should upgrade to version 2026.3.1027 or later to remediate the issue. Since the vendor advisory or patch links are not provided, confirm patch availability and installation instructions from official Telerik sources before deployment.

Description

A vulnerability in In Progress® Telerik® Document Processing Libraries prior to version 2026.3.1027 allows an unauthenticated attacker to bypass digital signature validation. The flaw involves improper verification of cryptographic signatures and certificate validation in RadPdfProcessing, enabling forged PDF content to be reported as unmodified with a valid signing certificate.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…