Skip to main content
CVE-2026-102800VulnerabilityPublished

Joomla Extension - dj-extensions.com - Unauthenticated Stored XSS in DJ-HelpfulArticles < 1.3.0 - The “was this

Source GCVE Database

0
Authoritative record:CVE-2026-102800· High 8.7

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 8.7 High.

Data as of 27 Oct 2026, 13:14 UTC

CVSS 4.0 base score
8.7High
How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Exploitation evidence

  1. Disclosed: evidence found.

    CVE published 27 Oct 2026

  2. Detectable: no evidence on record.

    No public nuclei template indexed

  3. Weaponised: no evidence on record.

    No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB

  4. Exploited in the wild: no evidence on record.

    Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation

  5. Observed by OffSeq Mirage: no evidence on record.

    No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 26 Oct 2026.

What to do

Affected software

ProductAffectedFixed in
DJ-HelpfulArticles extension for Joomlacom_djhelpfularticlesAffected
  • =1.0.0-1.2.0
Fixed in–

AI-suggested

A fixed version 1.3.0 or later should be applied once available. Until patched, administrators should restrict access to the backend and AJAX endpoints to trusted users only. Implementing input validation and output escaping on the 'ip' field, adding CSRF tokens, and rate limiting vote submissions are recommended mitigations.

Description

An unauthenticated stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DJ-HelpfulArticles Joomla extension versions prior to 1.3.0. The vulnerability arises because the 'was this article helpful' voting widget accepts a client-supplied IP field via AJAX handlers without proper validation or output escaping. This field is stored and later rendered in the administrator backend without HTML escaping, allowing injection of malicious scripts. The lack of CSRF protection, rate limiting, and reliance on an attacker-controlled field for vote de-duplication exacerbates the risk.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…