VulnerabilityPublished 2 Sep 2026Updated 29 Oct 2026

CVE-2026-62385: NLTK · Stable FrameNet and NKJP readers parse outside-root XML

Affects acronymSource GCVE Database

Compare

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 5.9 Medium : upgrade to 2.0.0_4 when convenient.

Data as of 30 Oct 2026, 07:30 UTC

CVSS 3.1 base score

5.9Medium

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

Patch: Available – fixed in 2.0.0_4

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: High
Privileges Required: None
User Interaction: None
Scope: Unchanged
Confidentiality: High
Integrity: None
Availability: None

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable component is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed 'remotely exploitable' and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: High: A successful attack depends on conditions beyond the attacker's control. That is, a successful attack cannot be accomplished at will, but requires the attacker to invest in some measurable amount of effort in preparation or execution against the vulnerable component before a successful attack can be expected. For example, a successful attack may require an attacker to: gather knowledge about the environment in which the vulnerable target/component exists; prepare the target environment to improve exploit reliability; or inject themselves into the logical network path between the target and the resource requested by the victim in order to read and/or modify network communications (e.g., a man in the middle attack).
Privileges Required: None: The attacker is unauthorized prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files to carry out an attack.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without any interaction from any user.
Scope: Unchanged: An exploited vulnerability can only affect resources managed by the same security authority. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are either the same, or both are managed by the same security authority.
Confidentiality: High: There is total loss of confidentiality, resulting in all resources within the impacted component being divulged to the attacker. Alternatively, access to only some restricted information is obtained, but the disclosed information presents a direct, serious impact.
Integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the impacted component.
Availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the impacted component.

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v3.1 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 2 Sep 2026
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponized: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 29 Oct 2026.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponized: A Metasploit exploit module or Exploit-DB entry exists (Metasploit scanner modules do not count), or CISA SSVC or the CVSS exploit maturity reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Upgrade acronym to 2.0.0_4.

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
Homebrewacronym`pkg:brew/acronym`Other threats	Affected >=2.0.0 <2.0.0_4	Fixed in 2.0.0_4

Check your own hosts for these packages with threat-finder (opens in a new tab), our free open-source scanner.

Description

### Summary Published `nltk==3.9.4` still contains several XML-reader entrypoints that build parser paths from caller-controlled selectors or trusted-looking index state without preserving the corpus-root boundary. ### Details - **Vulnerability type:** Path traversal and trusted-root bypass - **Affected component:** `FramenetCorpusReader.frame_by_name`, `FramenetCorpusReader.doc`, `FramenetCorpusReader.lu`, `NKJPCorpusReader.header` - **Affected versions:** Published `3.9.4` reproduced. Current source `v3.10.0-rc2` acted as a negative control and blocked the same payloads. - **Patched versions:** Patched in version 3.10.0, which includes the path-safety rejections seen in the release candidate. - **Root cause:** Stable reader paths still construct raw XML filenames from unsafe selectors, poisoned index state, or unsafe file identifiers. I confirmed four public stable entrypoints return parsed outside-root content: a parent-segment traversal frame name, a poisoned fulltext index filename, a poisoned LU id, and an unsafe NKJP header file identifier. Current source rejects the same payloads with explicit path-safety errors, which shows the bug is real but version-scoped to the published stable package. ### PoC **Preconditions** - The application exposes FrameNet or NKJP reader APIs while trusting NLTK to keep XML parsing inside a corpus root. **Steps** 1. Create a minimal FrameNet or NKJP corpus root and place attacker-chosen XML files outside that root. 2. Feed unsafe selectors or poisoned index state into the relevant public stable `3.9.4` APIs. 3. Observe `frame_by_name`, `doc`, `lu(...).exemplars`, or `header` return parsed outside-root values. 4. Run the same payloads against current source and observe explicit path-safety rejections. **Minimal reproducible excerpt** ```text framenet_frame_definition FRAME_LEAK framenet_doc_text DOC_LEAK framenet_lu_text LU_LEAK nkjp_header_title HEADER_LEAK ``` ### Impact Applications that process attacker-influenced FrameNet or NKJP corpus selectors or state can be made to parse XML outside the trusted corpus root through normal public reader responses. ### Remediation Keep these reader paths on the same root-confinement model as `CorpusReader.open()` and `nltk.pathsec`. Reject unsafe path components before constructing filenames from frame names, document filenames, LU ids, or NKJP file identifiers. ### Resources - https://github.com/nltk/nltk/blob/3.9.4/nltk/corpus/reader/framenet.py#L1366-L1369 - https://github.com/nltk/nltk/blob/3.9.4/nltk/corpus/reader/framenet.py#L1456-L1460 - https://github.com/nltk/nltk/blob/3.9.4/nltk/corpus/reader/framenet.py#L1803-L1810 - https://github.com/nltk/nltk/blob/3.9.4/nltk/corpus/reader/nkjp.py#L96-L103 - https://github.com/nltk/nltk/blob/3.9.4/nltk/corpus/reader/nkjp.py#L251-L256 - https://github.com/nltk/nltk/blob/v3.10.0-rc2/nltk/corpus/reader/framenet.py#L1388-L1399 - https://github.com/nltk/nltk/blob/v3.10.0-rc2/nltk/corpus/reader/nkjp.py#L96-L128

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…