Password Managers Vulnerable to Vault Compromise Under Malicious Server
Researchers at ETH Zurich have tested the security of Bitwarden, LastPass, Dashlane, and 1Password password managers. The post Password Managers Vulnerable to Vault Compromise Under Malicious Server appeared first on SecurityWeek .
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
The research conducted by ETH Zurich reveals that several widely used password managers—Bitwarden, LastPass, Dashlane, and 1Password—are vulnerable to vault compromise if the server they synchronize with is malicious or compromised. Password managers typically store encrypted vaults locally and synchronize data with cloud servers to enable cross-device access. The vulnerability arises because the client applications trust the server responses during synchronization without sufficient validation, allowing a malicious server to manipulate the data sent back to the client. This manipulation can lead to the extraction of the master password or decryption keys, or directly expose the vault contents. The attack vector requires the attacker to control or impersonate the synchronization server, which could be achieved through server compromise, DNS hijacking, or man-in-the-middle attacks. No user interaction beyond normal synchronization is needed, making the attack stealthy and potentially widespread. Although no patches or fixes have been linked yet, this vulnerability challenges the fundamental trust model of password managers relying on centralized servers. The lack of known exploits in the wild suggests this is a newly discovered issue, but the impact could be significant if weaponized. The medium severity rating reflects the complexity of attack setup but acknowledges the high impact on confidentiality if successful.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, the compromise of password manager vaults could lead to widespread credential theft, enabling attackers to access corporate accounts, internal systems, and sensitive data. This could result in data breaches, financial fraud, and disruption of business operations. Given the reliance on password managers for secure credential storage and management, a successful attack undermines user trust and security hygiene. Organizations in sectors with high security requirements—such as finance, healthcare, and government—are particularly at risk. The exposure of master passwords or vault contents could facilitate lateral movement within networks and escalate privileges. Additionally, the stealthy nature of the attack could delay detection, increasing the window of opportunity for attackers. The impact extends beyond individual users to organizational security posture, potentially affecting compliance with GDPR and other data protection regulations due to unauthorized data access.
Mitigation Recommendations
Organizations should implement multi-layered defenses beyond relying solely on password manager security. Specific mitigations include: 1) Using password managers that support end-to-end encryption with zero-trust synchronization protocols that do not rely on server trust. 2) Verifying the authenticity and integrity of synchronization servers using cryptographic methods such as certificate pinning and mutual TLS. 3) Monitoring network traffic for anomalies indicative of man-in-the-middle or DNS hijacking attacks. 4) Encouraging users to enable multi-factor authentication (MFA) on password manager accounts to reduce risk from stolen credentials. 5) Regularly updating password manager software to incorporate vendor patches once available. 6) Considering decentralized or local-only password management solutions for highly sensitive environments. 7) Conducting security awareness training to recognize potential phishing or social engineering attempts that could facilitate server compromise. 8) Employing network segmentation and strict access controls to limit exposure if credentials are compromised. These measures collectively reduce the risk of vault compromise through malicious server attacks.
Affected Countries
Germany, United Kingdom, France, Netherlands, Sweden, Belgium, Switzerland
Password Managers Vulnerable to Vault Compromise Under Malicious Server
Description
Researchers at ETH Zurich have tested the security of Bitwarden, LastPass, Dashlane, and 1Password password managers. The post Password Managers Vulnerable to Vault Compromise Under Malicious Server appeared first on SecurityWeek .
AI-Powered Analysis
Technical Analysis
The research conducted by ETH Zurich reveals that several widely used password managers—Bitwarden, LastPass, Dashlane, and 1Password—are vulnerable to vault compromise if the server they synchronize with is malicious or compromised. Password managers typically store encrypted vaults locally and synchronize data with cloud servers to enable cross-device access. The vulnerability arises because the client applications trust the server responses during synchronization without sufficient validation, allowing a malicious server to manipulate the data sent back to the client. This manipulation can lead to the extraction of the master password or decryption keys, or directly expose the vault contents. The attack vector requires the attacker to control or impersonate the synchronization server, which could be achieved through server compromise, DNS hijacking, or man-in-the-middle attacks. No user interaction beyond normal synchronization is needed, making the attack stealthy and potentially widespread. Although no patches or fixes have been linked yet, this vulnerability challenges the fundamental trust model of password managers relying on centralized servers. The lack of known exploits in the wild suggests this is a newly discovered issue, but the impact could be significant if weaponized. The medium severity rating reflects the complexity of attack setup but acknowledges the high impact on confidentiality if successful.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, the compromise of password manager vaults could lead to widespread credential theft, enabling attackers to access corporate accounts, internal systems, and sensitive data. This could result in data breaches, financial fraud, and disruption of business operations. Given the reliance on password managers for secure credential storage and management, a successful attack undermines user trust and security hygiene. Organizations in sectors with high security requirements—such as finance, healthcare, and government—are particularly at risk. The exposure of master passwords or vault contents could facilitate lateral movement within networks and escalate privileges. Additionally, the stealthy nature of the attack could delay detection, increasing the window of opportunity for attackers. The impact extends beyond individual users to organizational security posture, potentially affecting compliance with GDPR and other data protection regulations due to unauthorized data access.
Mitigation Recommendations
Organizations should implement multi-layered defenses beyond relying solely on password manager security. Specific mitigations include: 1) Using password managers that support end-to-end encryption with zero-trust synchronization protocols that do not rely on server trust. 2) Verifying the authenticity and integrity of synchronization servers using cryptographic methods such as certificate pinning and mutual TLS. 3) Monitoring network traffic for anomalies indicative of man-in-the-middle or DNS hijacking attacks. 4) Encouraging users to enable multi-factor authentication (MFA) on password manager accounts to reduce risk from stolen credentials. 5) Regularly updating password manager software to incorporate vendor patches once available. 6) Considering decentralized or local-only password management solutions for highly sensitive environments. 7) Conducting security awareness training to recognize potential phishing or social engineering attempts that could facilitate server compromise. 8) Employing network segmentation and strict access controls to limit exposure if credentials are compromised. These measures collectively reduce the risk of vault compromise through malicious server attacks.
Affected Countries
Threat ID: 6994388980d747be20a2d08e
Added to database: 2/17/2026, 9:44:41 AM
Last enriched: 2/17/2026, 9:44:56 AM
Last updated: 2/20/2026, 11:35:07 PM
Views: 66
Community Reviews
0 reviewsCrowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.
Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.
Related Threats
CVE-2026-27026: CWE-770: Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling in py-pdf pypdf
MediumCVE-2026-27025: CWE-834: Excessive Iteration in py-pdf pypdf
MediumCVE-2026-27024: CWE-835: Loop with Unreachable Exit Condition ('Infinite Loop') in py-pdf pypdf
MediumCVE-2026-27022: CWE-74: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements in Output Used by a Downstream Component ('Injection') in langchain-ai langgraphjs
MediumCVE-2026-2490: CWE-59: Improper Link Resolution Before File Access ('Link Following') in RustDesk Client for Windows
MediumActions
Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.
External Links
Need more coverage?
Upgrade to Pro Console in Console -> Billing for AI refresh and higher limits.
For incident response and remediation, OffSeq services can help resolve threats faster.