VulnerabilityPublished 21 Oct 2026Updated 29 Oct 2026

CVE-2026-112400: Pillow · GIF seek keeps rejected size after DecompressionBombError, allowing DoS

Affects aiderSource GCVE Database

Compare

Mentioned vulnerabilities

CVE-2022-45198

Authoritative record:CVE-2026-112400· High 8.7

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 8.7 High.

Data as of 30 Oct 2026, 07:30 UTC

CVSS 4.0 base score

8.7High

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Attack Requirements: None
Privileges Required: None
User Interaction: None
Vulnerable system confidentiality: None
Vulnerable system integrity: None
Vulnerable system availability: High
Subsequent system confidentiality: None
Subsequent system integrity: None
Subsequent system availability: None

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable system is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed below, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed “remotely exploitable” and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: The attacker must take no measurable action to exploit the vulnerability. The attack requires no target-specific circumvention to exploit the vulnerability. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable system.
Attack Requirements: None: The successful attack does not depend on the deployment and execution conditions of the vulnerable system. The attacker can expect to be able to reach the vulnerability and execute the exploit under all or most instances of the vulnerability.
Privileges Required: None: The attacker is unauthorized prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files of the vulnerable system to carry out an attack.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without interaction from any human user, other than the attacker.
Vulnerable system confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system availability: High: There is a total loss of availability, resulting in the attacker being able to fully deny access to resources in the Vulnerable System; this loss is either sustained (while the attacker continues to deliver the attack) or persistent (the condition persists even after the attack has completed). Alternatively, the attacker has the ability to deny some availability, but the loss of availability presents a direct, serious consequence to the Vulnerable System (e.g., the attacker cannot disrupt existing connections, but can prevent new connections; the attacker can repeatedly exploit a vulnerability that, in each instance of a successful attack, leaks a only small amount of memory, but after repeated exploitation causes a service to become completely unavailable).
Subsequent system confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the Subsequent System or all confidentiality impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the Subsequent System or all integrity impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Subsequent System or all availability impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v4.0 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 19 Oct 2026
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponized: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 29 Oct 2026.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponized: A Metasploit exploit module or Exploit-DB entry exists (Metasploit scanner modules do not count), or CISA SSVC or the CVSS exploit maturity reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
Homebrewaider`pkg:brew/aider`Other threats	Affected >=0.86.1_1	Fixed in–

Check your own hosts for these packages with threat-finder (opens in a new tab), our free open-source scanner.

Description

``` ============================================================================ GIF seek keeps rejected size after DecompressionBombError, allowing DoS Location: src/PIL/GifImagePlugin.py:293 in GifImageFile._seek() Commit: a707c6b21c313880d0771e54965d142dd42358b6 ============================================================================ ``` A GIF of about 60 bytes can make Pillow allocate gigabytes of memory. This affects applications that catch the "image too large" error raised while stepping to a later animation frame and then keep using the same image object. Pillow correctly refuses the oversized frame, but it stores the refused dimensions on the image object anyway, and later operations size their memory from them. An attacker who can upload a GIF to such a service can exhaust its memory: the process either fails with an out-of-memory error after committing gigabytes, or is killed by the operating system. There is no memory corruption. The bug is in `GifImageFile._seek()` (`src/PIL/GifImagePlugin.py:292-294`). When a frame's extent enlarges the image, the code assigns the new size to `self._size` and only then calls `Image._decompression_bomb_check()`. Nothing restores the old size when `DecompressionBombError` is raised, because `seek()` only rolls back on `EOFError`. After the caught error, `im.size` reports the rejected size while the pixel buffer `im.im` is still the 1×1 first frame. Because the extent is a 16-bit offset plus a 16-bit size, that rejected size can be as large as 131070×131070. In the attached reproducer, the rejected size is 40000×40000. A retried `seek(1)` followed by `load()` then reaches `load_prepare()`, which calls `Image.core.fill()` with that size to decode a single pixel. Peak memory rises from 17 MiB to 1700 MiB before a 3 GiB address-space cap stops the next allocation. `Image.new("RGB", im.size, ...)` and `rotate(..., expand=True)` also allocate from the stale size. The default paths are unaffected: plain `Image.open()` plus `load()`, `ImageSequence.Iterator`, and `n_frames`/`is_animated`. The ordering was introduced in c9f1b35e9810 ("Added GIF decompression bomb check", 2022-06-30, first released in 9.2.0), the check added for CVE-2022-45198. The two dispose-extent checks later in the same function already validate before using the size, and the attached patch makes this check follow the same order. ## Details `GifImageFile._seek()` lets a later frame enlarge the image, and performs the decompression-bomb check for the new size only *after* storing it on the object: ```python # src/PIL/GifImagePlugin.py:289-294 (GifImageFile._seek) x0, y0 = i16(s, 0), i16(s, 2) x1, y1 = x0 + i16(s, 4), y0 + i16(s, 6) if (x1 > self.size[0] or y1 > self.size[1]) and update_image: self._size = max(x1, self.size[0]), max(y1, self.size[1]) # state mutated Image._decompression_bomb_check(self._size) # ...then validated ``` `_decompression_bomb_check()` (`src/PIL/Image.py:3586`) raises `DecompressionBombError` for anything above `2 * MAX_IMAGE_PIXELS` (178 956 970 px by default), but by then `self._size` already holds the rejected value and nothing restores it: `seek()` (`GifImagePlugin.py:166-179`) only rolls back on `EOFError`, and `_seek(0)` only ever grows `_size`. The object that the application still holds therefore reports `im.size == (40000, 40000)` while `im.im` is the 1×1 buffer of frame 0. Compare the two dispose-extent checks a few lines further down in the same function (`GifImagePlugin.py:383` and `:407`), which call `_decompression_bomb_check(dispose_size)` *before* the corresponding `Image.core.fill()`, and `TiffImagePlugin.load_prepare()` (`src/PIL/TiffImagePlugin.py:1319-1321`), which checks `_tile_size` before allocating from it. With this 60-byte GIF (hex) ``` 47494638396101000100800000000000ffffff GIF89a, 1x1 screen, 2-entry global palette 2c000000000100010000 02 024401 00 frame 0: 1x1 @ (0,0), LZW data 2c00000000409c409c00 frame 1 descriptor: 40000x40000 @ (0,0) 2c000000000100010000 02 024401 00 another 1x1 frame 3b trailer ``` `Image.open()` succeeds (`im.size == (1, 1)`), `im.seek(1)` raises `DecompressionBombError: Image size (1600000000 pixels) exceeds limit of 178956970 pixels`, and afterwards `im.size == (40000, 40000)`, `im.im.size == (1, 1)`, `im.tell() == 0`. What happens next depends on what the application does with the object, but several ordinary operations take their dimensions from `im.size` rather than from the C buffer: - Retrying `im.seek(1)`. The failed `_seek` left `self.__offset == 0` and the file pointer just past the 9-byte descriptor, so the retry parses whatever follows — in the file above, a valid 1×1 frame — and succeeds. `im.load()` then runs `GifImageFile.load_prepare()`: ```python # src/PIL/GifImagePlugin.py:452-456 elif self.mode in ("RGB", "RGBA"): self._prev_im = self.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…