VulnerabilityPublished 13 Aug 2026Updated 26 Oct 2026

CVE-2026-55195: py7zr · Decompression bomb (zip bomb) denial of service via unchecked extraction size

Affects ratarmountSource GCVE Database

Authoritative record:CVE-2026-55195· High 8.7

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 8.7 High : upgrade to 1.3.0_1 soon.

Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 17:16 UTC

CVSS 4.0 base score

8.7High

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.3% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 24% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.
Patch: Available – fixed in 1.3.0_1

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Attack Requirements: None
Privileges Required: None
User Interaction: None
Vulnerable system confidentiality: None
Vulnerable system integrity: None
Vulnerable system availability: High
Subsequent system confidentiality: None
Subsequent system integrity: None
Subsequent system availability: None

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable system is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed below, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed “remotely exploitable” and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: The attacker must take no measurable action to exploit the vulnerability. The attack requires no target-specific circumvention to exploit the vulnerability. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable system.
Attack Requirements: None: The successful attack does not depend on the deployment and execution conditions of the vulnerable system. The attacker can expect to be able to reach the vulnerability and execute the exploit under all or most instances of the vulnerability.
Privileges Required: None: The attacker is unauthorized prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files of the vulnerable system to carry out an attack.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without interaction from any human user, other than the attacker.
Vulnerable system confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system availability: High: There is a total loss of availability, resulting in the attacker being able to fully deny access to resources in the Vulnerable System; this loss is either sustained (while the attacker continues to deliver the attack) or persistent (the condition persists even after the attack has completed). Alternatively, the attacker has the ability to deny some availability, but the loss of availability presents a direct, serious consequence to the Vulnerable System (e.g., the attacker cannot disrupt existing connections, but can prevent new connections; the attacker can repeatedly exploit a vulnerability that, in each instance of a successful attack, leaks a only small amount of memory, but after repeated exploitation causes a service to become completely unavailable).
Subsequent system confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the Subsequent System or all confidentiality impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the Subsequent System or all integrity impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Subsequent System or all availability impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v4.0 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 8 Jul 2026
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 26 Oct 2026.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC or the CVSS exploit maturity reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Upgrade ratarmount to 1.3.0_1.

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
Homebrewratarmount`pkg:brew/ratarmount`Other threats	Affected >=1.1.0 <1.3.0_1	Fixed in 1.3.0_1

Check your own hosts for these packages with threat-finder (opens in a new tab), our free open-source scanner.

Description

py7zr's `Worker.decompress()` extracts archive entries without tracking total decompressed size. A crafted `.7z` file can exhaust disk or memory before the extraction completes. Measured: 15.6 KB archive → 100 MB output (6,556:1 ratio). **Proof of concept:** ```python import py7zr, tempfile, os # create bomb: compress 100MB of zeros into ~15KB bomb_path = tempfile.mktemp(suffix='.7z') with py7zr.SevenZipFile(bomb_path, 'w') as z: import io z.writef(io.BytesIO(b'\x00' * 100 * 1024 * 1024), 'bomb.bin') print(f'archive size: {os.path.getsize(bomb_path):,} bytes') # extract — no size check with py7zr.SevenZipFile(bomb_path, 'r') as z: z.extractall(path=tempfile.mkdtemp()) print('extracted 100 MB from ~15 KB archive') ``` **Root cause:** `Worker.decompress()` in `py7zr/worker.py` writes decompressed data directly to disk without a running total or configurable size limit. There is no equivalent of Python's `zipfile` `max_size` parameter. **Fix:** track cumulative decompressed bytes and raise before writing if a limit is exceeded: ```python MAX_EXTRACT_SIZE = 2 * 1024 ** 3 # 2 GB default, configurable total = 0 for chunk in decompressed_chunks: total += len(chunk) if total > MAX_EXTRACT_SIZE: raise py7zr.exceptions.DecompressionBombError( f'Extraction aborted: decompressed size exceeded {MAX_EXTRACT_SIZE} bytes' ) outfile.write(chunk) ``` Tested on py7zr 0.22.0, Python 3.12, Ubuntu 22.04.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…