CVE-2026-67422VulnerabilityPublished 13 Aug 2026Updated 26 Oct 2026

caret, tilde, betterem · pymdown-extensions: exponential-backtracking ReDoS

Affects mkdocs-materialSource GCVE Database

Mentioned vulnerabilities

CVE-2025-68142

Authoritative record:CVE-2026-67422· High 7.5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 7.5 High : upgrade to 9.7.7 soon.

Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 17:16 UTC

CVSS 3.1 base score

7.5High

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.6% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 48% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.
Patch: Available – fixed in 9.7.7

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Privileges Required: None
User Interaction: None
Scope: Unchanged
Confidentiality: None
Integrity: None
Availability: High

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable component is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed 'remotely exploitable' and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable component.
Privileges Required: None: The attacker is unauthorized prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files to carry out an attack.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without any interaction from any user.
Scope: Unchanged: An exploited vulnerability can only affect resources managed by the same security authority. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are either the same, or both are managed by the same security authority.
Confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the impacted component.
Integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the impacted component.
Availability: High: There is total loss of availability, resulting in the attacker being able to fully deny access to resources in the impacted component; this loss is either sustained (while the attacker continues to deliver the attack) or persistent (the condition persists even after the attack has completed). Alternatively, the attacker has the ability to deny some availability, but the loss of availability presents a direct, serious consequence to the impacted component (e.g., the attacker cannot disrupt existing connections, but can prevent new connections; the attacker can repeatedly exploit a vulnerability that, in each instance of a successful attack, leaks a only small amount of memory, but after repeated exploitation causes a service to become completely unavailable).

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v3.1 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 6 Aug 2026
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 26 Oct 2026.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC or the CVSS exploit maturity reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Upgrade mkdocs-material to 9.7.7.

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
Homebrewmkdocs-material`pkg:brew/mkdocs-material`Other threats	Affected >=9.5.41 <9.7.7	Fixed in 9.7.7

Check your own hosts for these packages with threat-finder (opens in a new tab), our free open-source scanner.

Description

### Summary Four inline processors in pymdown-extensions contain regular expressions with exponential backtracking. A single untrusted Markdown line under 50 bytes drives `markdown.markdown()` into unbounded CPU on the rendering thread (seconds at ~45 bytes, growing exponentially with each added character). All four fire in the extension's **default configuration** and are reachable through the documented public API. The `caret`/`tilde`/ `betterem` blow-up was introduced by the emphasis-pattern rewrite in PR #2547 (first released in **10.13**, Dec 2024) — earlier releases used a linear `(.+?)` / `([^\s]+?)` content group — and is present through **11.0** (latest); `magiclink`'s host pattern is long-standing and affects effectively all releases. Likely **CWE-1333 (Inefficient Regular Expression Complexity)**. This is a distinct issue from CVE-2025-68142 (ReDoS in `pymdownx.blocks.caption`, `RE_FIG_NUM`, fixed in 10.16.1): different extensions, different regexes, and a different root cause (delimiter-run partition ambiguity rather than a `.`/`\.` typo). ### Details Four regexes share, or closely mirror, a vulnerable shape — an inner group that can partition a run of the delimiter character into `{2,}`-sized pieces in exponentially many ways, wrapped in a lazy `+?` that must fail before the engine can give up: | Extension | Regex | Location (`11.0`) | |---|---|---| | `pymdownx.caret` (superscript `^…^`) | `SUP2` | `pymdownx/caret.py:56` | | `pymdownx.tilde` (subscript `~…~`) | `SUB2` | `pymdownx/tilde.py:55` | | `pymdownx.betterem` (underscore `_…_`) | `SMART_UNDER_EM2` (default) | `pymdownx/betterem.py:93` | | `pymdownx.magiclink` (bare-URL autolink) | `RE_LINK` | `pymdownx/magiclink.py:56` (host at `:59`) | `pymdownx/caret.py:56` (`pymdown-extensions 11.0`): ```python SUP2 = r'(?<!\^)(\^)(?![\^\s])((?:[^\^\s]|\^{2,})+?)(?<![\^\s])(\^)(?!\^)' ``` The content group `(?:[^\^\s]|\^{2,})+?` matches a run of carets only via the `\^{2,}` branch. A run of *k* carets can be split into ≥2-length pieces in exponentially many combinations; when no caret can serve as a valid closing delimiter (the trailing `(?<![\^\s])(\^)` cannot be satisfied), the engine explores every partition before failing. `SUB2` (tilde) and `SMART_UNDER_EM2` (betterem) are the same construct for `~` and `_`. In `betterem` the default `smart_enable='underscore'` routes underscores to `SmartUnderscoreProcessor` → `SMART_UNDER_EM2` (`betterem.py:93`), which is the default-reachable, API-exploitable pattern; the non-smart `UNDER_EM2` (`:69`, used only when `smart_enable` is `asterisk`/`disable`) shares the shape but did not reproduce through the public `markdown.markdown()` pipeline on the tested payload, so a fix and regression test should target `SMART_UNDER_EM2`. `pymdownx/magiclink.py:59` has the analogous ambiguity in the host portion, where overlapping character classes let a run of dots be grouped exponentially: ```python (?:ht|f)tps?://[^_\W][-\w]*(?:\.[-\w.]+)* # host: '\.' and '[-\w.]' inside (?:...)* both match '.' ``` `SUP2`/`SUB2`/`SMART_UNDER_EM2` are applied at each delimiter occurrence via the default `PatternSequenceProcessor` subclasses (`pymdownx/util.py`); `RE_LINK` is applied by `MagiclinkPattern` (registered unconditionally at priority 85). In all four cases, rendering `markdown.markdown(src, extensions=[ext])` on untrusted `src` in default configuration is sufficient to reach the regex. ### PoC Single self-contained script; runs against the pinned release in an ephemeral env. Non-destructive — the input is ordinary Markdown text; the impact is CPU/time (a per-render alarm caps each attempt so the script terminates). ```python import signal import time from importlib.metadata import version import markdown print(f"# pymdown-extensions {version('pymdown-extensions')} / markdown {version('markdown')}") CAP = 5.0 # a single render exceeding this is treated as a hang class Timeout(Exception): pass def render(ext, text): signal.signal(signal.SIGALRM, lambda *_: (_ for _ in ()).throw(Timeout())) signal.setitimer(signal.ITIMER_REAL, CAP) t = time.perf_counter() try: markdown.markdown(text, extensions=[ext]) return time.perf_counter() - t except Timeout: return None finally: signal.setitimer(signal.ITIMER_REAL, 0) # ext -> (malicious builder, benign builder [valid & closed], ramp, hang count) CASES = { "pymdownx.caret": (lambda n: "^a" + "^" * n + "b", lambda n: "^" + "a" * n + "^", [24, 30, 36], 44), "pymdownx.tilde": (lambda n: "~a" + "~" * n + "b", lambda n: "~" + "a" * n + "~", [24, 30, 36], 44), "pymdownx.betterem": (lambda n: "_a" + "_" * n + "b", lambda n: "_" + "a" * n + "_", [24, 30, 36], 44), "pymdownx.magiclink": (lambda n: "http://a" + "." * n + " ", lambda n: "http://" + "a" * n + ".com ", [28, 32, 36], 40), } repro = [] for ext, (evil, benign, ramp, hang) in CASES.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…