Skip to main content
VulnerabilityPublished Updated

CVE-2026-82398: pypdf · Inefficient handling of non-whitespace inputs in read_until_whitespace

Affects psutilsSource GCVE Database

0
Compare
Authoritative record:CVE-2026-82398· Medium 6.9

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 6.9 Medium : upgrade to 3.3.16_1 when convenient.

Data as of 1 Nov 2026, 00:10 UTC

CVSS 4.0 base score
6.9Medium
How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.
Patch
Available – fixed in 3.3.16_1
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Exploitation evidence

  1. Disclosed: evidence found.

    CVE published 31 Aug 2026

  2. Detectable: no evidence on record.

    No public nuclei template indexed

  3. Weaponized: no evidence on record.

    No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB

  4. Exploited in the wild: no evidence on record.

    Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation

  5. Observed by OffSeq Mirage: no evidence on record.

    No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 31 Oct 2026.

What to do

Upgrade psutils to 3.3.16_1.

Affected software

ProductAffectedFixed in
Homebrewpsutilspkg:brew/psutilsOther threatsAffected
  • >=3.0 <3.3.16_1
Fixed in
  • 3.3.16_1

Check your own hosts for these packages with threat-finder (opens in a new tab), our free open-source scanner.

AI-suggested

Upgrade to pypdf version 3.3.16_1 or later, where this vulnerability is fixed. If upgrading is not immediately possible, apply the changes from pull request #3947 as a temporary workaround to mitigate the issue.

Description

CVE-2026-82398 is a vulnerability in pypdf affecting versions >=3.0 and <3.3.16_1. It involves inefficient handling of inputs without whitespace in the read_until_whitespace function, which can cause long runtimes when processing crafted PDFs. The issue has been fixed in version 3.3.16_1.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…