Skip to main content
VulnerabilityPublished Updated

CVE-2026-71870: pypdf · Possible large memory usage for large /ToUnicode streams

Affects psutilsSource GCVE Database

0
Compare
Authoritative record:CVE-2026-71870· Medium 4.8

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 4.8 Medium : upgrade to 3.3.16_1 when convenient.

Data as of 1 Nov 2026, 00:10 UTC

CVSS 4.0 base score
4.8Medium
How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.
Patch
Available – fixed in 3.3.16_1
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Exploitation evidence

  1. Disclosed: evidence found.

    CVE published 7 Aug 2026

  2. Detectable: no evidence on record.

    No public nuclei template indexed

  3. Weaponized: no evidence on record.

    No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB

  4. Exploited in the wild: no evidence on record.

    Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation

  5. Observed by OffSeq Mirage: no evidence on record.

    No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 31 Oct 2026.

What to do

Upgrade psutils to 3.3.16_1.

Affected software

ProductAffectedFixed in
Homebrewpsutilspkg:brew/psutilsOther threatsAffected
  • >=3.0 <3.3.16_1
Fixed in
  • 3.3.16_1

Check your own hosts for these packages with threat-finder (opens in a new tab), our free open-source scanner.

AI-suggested

Upgrade pypdf to version 3.3.16_1 or later, where this vulnerability is fixed. If upgrading is not immediately possible, apply the changes from pull request #3944 as a workaround to mitigate the issue.

Description

CVE-2026-71870 is a vulnerability in pypdf affecting versions from 3.0 up to but not including 3.3.16_1. It allows an attacker to craft a PDF with a large /ToUnicode stream in a font, causing excessive memory consumption during parsing, such as text extraction. This issue has been fixed in pypdf version 3.3.16_1.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…