CVE-2026-12289VulnerabilityPublished 22 Jun 2026Updated 21 Oct 2026

SUSE · security update for firefox

Affects SUSESource GCVE Database

Compare

Mentioned vulnerabilities

Authoritative record:CVE-2026-12289· High 8.8

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 8.8 High · patch available : patch SUSE soon.

Data as of 5 Nov 2026, 00:01 UTC

CVSS 3.1 base score

8.8High

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.3% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 33% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.
Patch: Available

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Privileges Required: None
User Interaction: Required
Scope: Unchanged
Confidentiality: High
Integrity: High
Availability: High

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable component is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed 'remotely exploitable' and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable component.
Privileges Required: None: The attacker is unauthorized prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files to carry out an attack.
User Interaction: Required: Successful exploitation of this vulnerability requires a user to take some action before the vulnerability can be exploited.
Scope: Unchanged: An exploited vulnerability can only affect resources managed by the same security authority. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are either the same, or both are managed by the same security authority.
Confidentiality: High: There is total loss of confidentiality, resulting in all resources within the impacted component being divulged to the attacker. Alternatively, access to only some restricted information is obtained, but the disclosed information presents a direct, serious impact.
Integrity: High: There is a total loss of integrity, or a complete loss of protection. For example, the attacker is able to modify any/all files protected by the impacted component. Alternatively, only some files can be modified, but malicious modification would present a direct, serious consequence to the impacted component.
Availability: High: There is total loss of availability, resulting in the attacker being able to fully deny access to resources in the impacted component; this loss is either sustained (while the attacker continues to deliver the attack) or persistent (the condition persists even after the attack has completed). Alternatively, the attacker has the ability to deny some availability, but the loss of availability presents a direct, serious consequence to the impacted component (e.g., the attacker cannot disrupt existing connections, but can prevent new connections; the attacker can repeatedly exploit a vulnerability that, in each instance of a successful attack, leaks a only small amount of memory, but after repeated exploitation causes a service to become completely unavailable).

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v3.1 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 16 Jun 2026
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponized: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 5 Nov 2026.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponized: A Metasploit exploit module or Exploit-DB entry exists (Metasploit scanner modules do not count), or CISA SSVC or the CVSS exploit maturity reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
SUSE Product Security Team SUSE	Affected <152	Fixed in 152

AI-suggested

A security update for Firefox and Thunderbird is available for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8, including ESR 140.12 and version 152 releases. Users should apply the update as per Red Hat's guidance at https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258 to remediate these vulnerabilities. The advisory RHSA-2026:27717 provides detailed instructions. No indication of no-action or partial mitigation is stated; therefore, applying the official update is recommended.

Description

This update for MozillaFirefox fixes the following issues: - Update to Firefox Extended Support Release 140.13.0 ESR. - MFSA 2026-70 (bsc#1271649): * CVE-2026-15718: Invalid pointer in the JavaScript: WebAssembly component * CVE-2026-15719: Site isolation issue in the DOM: Navigation component * CVE-2026-16349: Same-origin policy bypass in the DOM: Navigation component * CVE-2026-16350: Incorrect boundary conditions in the Audio/Video: cubeb component * CVE-2026-16362: Use-after-free in the WebRTC: Audio/Video component * CVE-2026-16351: Sandbox escape due to use-after-free in the DOM: Navigation component * CVE-2026-16352: Sandbox escape due to use-after-free in the Disability Access APIs component * CVE-2026-16363: JIT miscompilation in the JavaScript: WebAssembly component * CVE-2026-16353: Invalid pointer in the DOM: Bindings (WebIDL) component * CVE-2026-16354: Information disclosure in the Graphics: ImageLib component * CVE-2026-16368: Incorrect boundary conditions in the JavaScript: WebAssembly component * CVE-2026-16369: Integer overflow in the JavaScript: WebAssembly component * CVE-2026-16355: JIT miscompilation in the JavaScript Engine: JIT component * CVE-2026-16356: Sandbox escape due to use-after-free in the Disability Access APIs component * CVE-2026-16357: Incorrect boundary conditions in the Graphics component * CVE-2026-16371: Privilege escalation in the DOM: Navigation component * CVE-2026-16374: Information disclosure in the Framework component in DevTools * CVE-2026-16375: Site isolation issue in the Networking: HTTP component * CVE-2026-16377: Mitigation bypass in the PDF Viewer component * CVE-2026-16379: Privilege escalation in the DOM: Content Processes component * CVE-2026-16358: Site isolation issue in the Graphics: WebRender component * CVE-2026-16381: Same-origin policy bypass in the Networking: DNS component * CVE-2026-16383: Mitigation bypass in the DOM: Networking component * CVE-2026-16387: Site isolation issue in the Networking component * CVE-2026-16390: Mitigation bypass in the Enterprise Policies component * CVE-2026-16391: Information disclosure in the Storage: IndexedDB component * CVE-2026-16359: Incorrect boundary conditions in the Audio/Video: GMP component * CVE-2026-16396: Privilege escalation in WebExtensions * CVE-2026-16405: Information disclosure in the Networking: WebSockets component * CVE-2026-16412: Memory safety bugs fixed in Firefox ESR 140.13 and Firefox 153 * CVE-2026-16360: Memory safety bugs fixed in Firefox ESR 115.38, Firefox ESR 140.13 and Firefox 153 * CVE-2026-16361: Memory safety bugs fixed in Firefox ESR 115.38 and Firefox ESR 140.13 - Remove obsolete `mozilla-nss-certs` (bsc#1269226).

Impact

The vulnerabilities could allow attackers to escape sandbox restrictions, disclose sensitive information, escalate privileges, cause denial-of-service conditions, bypass mitigations, and violate same-origin policies. These impacts affect the security boundaries and memory safety of Firefox and Thunderbird, potentially compromising confidentiality, integrity, and availability of affected systems. The severity is rated high by the source, reflecting significant risk if unpatched.

Summary

This Red Hat security advisory addresses a set of 29 vulnerabilities in Mozilla Firefox and Thunderbird, including sandbox escapes in DOM and Security Process Sandboxing components, information disclosure, memory safety bugs, mitigation bypasses, privilege escalation in the Graphics WebRender component, denial-of-service in the Graphics ImageLib component, and same-origin policy bypass in the Networking Cookies component. The fixes apply to Firefox ESR 140.12, Firefox 152, Thunderbird ESR 140.12, and Thunderbird 152 versions distributed with Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8. The vulnerabilities span multiple CWE categories such as CWE-266 (Privilege Escalation), CWE-787 (Out-of-bounds Write), CWE-823 (Use After Free), and others. The advisory is identified as RHSA-2026:27717 and rates the update as having an Important security impact.

CWE-266Incorrect Privilege Assignment (opens in a new tab)
Base weaknessOWASP Top 10 A06:2025: Insecure Design (opens in a new tab)
A product incorrectly assigns a privilege to a particular actor, creating an unintended sphere of control for that actor.
Architecture and Design · Operation
Very carefully manage the setting, management, and handling of privileges. Explicitly manage trust zones in the software.
Architecture and Design · Operation · Environment Hardening
Run your code using the lowest privileges that are required to accomplish the necessary tasks. If possible, create isolated accounts with limited privileges that are only used for a single task. That way, a successful attack will not immediately give the attacker access to the rest of the software or its environment.
OWASP Cheat Sheets
Docker Security (opens in a new tab)
Third Party Javascript Management (opens in a new tab)
Virtual Patching (opens in a new tab)
Secure Design Principles (opens in a new tab)
OWASP ASVS 4.0.3
V1.4.4 (opens in a new tab)
V1.4.5 (opens in a new tab)
V1.10.1 (opens in a new tab)
From MITRE CWE, MITRE CAPEC and OWASP (Top 10, OpenCRE).
CWE-823Use of Out-of-range Pointer Offset (opens in a new tab)
Base weakness
The product performs pointer arithmetic on a valid pointer, but it uses an offset that can point outside of the intended range of valid memory locations for the resulting pointer.
OWASP Cheat Sheets
XML Security (opens in a new tab)
Mass Assignment (opens in a new tab)
OWASP ASVS 4.0.3
V13.3.1 (opens in a new tab)
V5.1.4 (opens in a new tab)
V5.1.3 (opens in a new tab)
Attack patterns
Pointer Manipulation (opens in a new tab)
From MITRE CWE, MITRE CAPEC and OWASP (Top 10, OpenCRE).
CWE-825Expired Pointer Dereference (opens in a new tab)
Base weakness
The product dereferences a pointer that contains a location for memory that was previously valid, but is no longer valid.
Architecture and Design
Choose a language that provides automatic memory management.
Implementation
When freeing pointers, be sure to set them to NULL once they are freed. However, the utilization of multiple or complex data structures may lower the usefulness of this strategy.
OWASP Cheat Sheets
XML Security (opens in a new tab)
Mass Assignment (opens in a new tab)
OWASP ASVS 4.0.3
V13.3.1 (opens in a new tab)
V5.1.4 (opens in a new tab)
V5.1.3 (opens in a new tab)
From MITRE CWE, MITRE CAPEC and OWASP (Top 10, OpenCRE).
CWE-787Out-of-bounds Write (opens in a new tab)
Base weaknessLikelihood of exploit: HighCWE Top 25 (2025): #5
The product writes data past the end, or before the beginning, of the intended buffer.
Requirements · Language Selection
Use a language that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid.
Architecture and Design · Libraries or Frameworks
Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid.
Operation · Build and Compilation · Environment Hardening
Use automatic buffer overflow detection mechanisms that are offered by certain compilers or compiler extensions. Examples include: the Microsoft Visual Studio /GS flag, Fedora/Red Hat FORTIFY_SOURCE GCC flag, StackGuard, and ProPolice, which provide various mechanisms including canary-based detection and range/index…
OWASP Cheat Sheets
XML Security (opens in a new tab)
Mass Assignment (opens in a new tab)
OWASP ASVS 4.0.3
V13.3.1 (opens in a new tab)
V5.1.4 (opens in a new tab)
V5.1.3 (opens in a new tab)
From MITRE CWE, MITRE CAPEC and OWASP (Top 10, OpenCRE).
CWE-653Improper Isolation or Compartmentalization (opens in a new tab)
Class weaknessOWASP Top 10 A06:2025: Insecure Design (opens in a new tab)
The product does not properly compartmentalize or isolate functionality, processes, or resources that require different privilege levels, rights, or permissions.
Architecture and Design
Break up privileges between different modules, objects, or entities. Minimize the interfaces between modules and require strong access control between them.
OWASP Cheat Sheets
Secure Design Principles (opens in a new tab)
From MITRE CWE, MITRE CAPEC and OWASP (Top 10, OpenCRE).
CWE-403Exposure of File Descriptor to Unintended Control Sphere (File Descriptor Leak) (opens in a new tab)
Base weakness
A process does not close sensitive file descriptors before invoking a child process, which allows the child to perform unauthorized I/O operations using those descriptors.
CWE-843Access of Resource Using Incompatible Type (Type Confusion) (opens in a new tab)
Base weakness
The product allocates or initializes a resource such as a pointer, object, or variable using one type, but it later accesses that resource using a type that is incompatible with the original type.
CWE-733Compiler Optimization Removal or Modification of Security-critical Code (opens in a new tab)
Base weakness
The developer builds a security-critical protection mechanism into the software, but the compiler optimizes the program such that the mechanism is removed or modified.
Attack patterns
Buffer Overflow via Environment Variables (opens in a new tab)
Filter Failure through Buffer Overflow (opens in a new tab)
Overflow Variables and Tags (opens in a new tab)
Buffer Overflow in an API Call (opens in a new tab)
Buffer Overflow in Local Command-Line Utilities (opens in a new tab)
From MITRE CWE, MITRE CAPEC and OWASP (Top 10, OpenCRE).
CWE-346Origin Validation Error (opens in a new tab)
Class weaknessOWASP Top 10 A07:2025: Authentication Failures (opens in a new tab)
The product does not properly verify that the source of data or communication is valid.
OWASP Cheat Sheets
OWASP Authentication (opens in a new tab)
OWASP ASVS 4.0.3
V14.5.2 (opens in a new tab)
V14.5.3 (opens in a new tab)
V1.4.4 (opens in a new tab)
Attack patterns
JSON Hijacking (aka JavaScript Hijacking) (opens in a new tab)
Cache Poisoning (opens in a new tab)
DNS Cache Poisoning (opens in a new tab)
Exploit Script-Based APIs (opens in a new tab)
Application API Message Manipulation via Man-in-the-Middle (opens in a new tab)
From MITRE CWE, MITRE CAPEC and OWASP (Top 10, OpenCRE).
CWE-243Creation of chroot Jail Without Changing Working Directory (opens in a new tab)
Variant weaknessLikelihood of exploit: High
The product uses the chroot() system call to create a jail, but it does not change the working directory afterward.
CWE-807Reliance on Untrusted Inputs in a Security Decision (opens in a new tab)
Base weaknessLikelihood of exploit: HighOWASP Top 10 A06:2025: Insecure Design (opens in a new tab)
The product uses a protection mechanism that relies on the existence or values of an input, but the input can be modified by an untrusted actor in a way that bypasses the protection mechanism.
Architecture and Design · Attack Surface Reduction
Store state information and sensitive data on the server side only.
Architecture and Design · Libraries or Frameworks
Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid.
Architecture and Design
For any security checks that are performed on the client side, ensure that these checks are duplicated on the server side, in order to avoid CWE-602. Attackers can bypass the client-side checks by modifying values after the checks have been performed, or by changing the client to remove the client-side checks…
OWASP Cheat Sheets
Secure Design Principles (opens in a new tab)
From MITRE CWE, MITRE CAPEC and OWASP (Top 10, OpenCRE).
CWE-131Incorrect Calculation of Buffer Size (opens in a new tab)
Base weaknessLikelihood of exploit: High
The product does not correctly calculate the size to be used when allocating a buffer.
Implementation
When allocating a buffer for the purpose of transforming, converting, or encoding an input, allocate enough memory to handle the largest possible encoding. For example, in a routine that converts "&" characters to "&" for HTML entity encoding, the output buffer needs to be at least 5 times as large as the input…
Implementation
Understand the programming language's underlying representation and how it interacts with numeric calculation (CWE-681). Pay close attention to byte size discrepancies, precision, signed/unsigned distinctions, truncation, conversion and casting between types, "not-a-number" calculations, and how the language handles…
Implementation · Input Validation
Perform input validation on any numeric input by ensuring that it is within the expected range. Enforce that the input meets both the minimum and maximum requirements for the expected range.
Attack patterns
Overflow Buffers (opens in a new tab)
Buffer Overflow via Parameter Expansion (opens in a new tab)
From MITRE CWE, MITRE CAPEC and OWASP (Top 10, OpenCRE).
CWE-1286Improper Validation of Syntactic Correctness of Input (opens in a new tab)
Base weakness
The product receives input that is expected to be well-formed - i.e., to comply with a certain syntax - but it does not validate or incorrectly validates that the input complies with the syntax.
Implementation · Input Validation
Assume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does.
OWASP Cheat Sheets
XML Security (opens in a new tab)
Mass Assignment (opens in a new tab)
OWASP ASVS 4.0.3
V13.3.1 (opens in a new tab)
V5.1.4 (opens in a new tab)
V5.1.3 (opens in a new tab)
Attack patterns
SQL Injection (opens in a new tab)
NoSQL Injection (opens in a new tab)
From MITRE CWE, MITRE CAPEC and OWASP (Top 10, OpenCRE).

GCVE source: db.gcve.eu
Csaf Category: csaf_security_advisory
Csaf Version: 2.0
Publisher: Red Hat Product Security
Advisory ID: RHSA-2026:27717
CVE Count: 29
Additional Cves: CVE-2026-12290, CVE-2026-12291, CVE-2026-12292, CVE-2026-12294, CVE-2026-12295, CVE-2026-12296, CVE-2026-12297, CVE-2026-12298, CVE-2026-12299, CVE-2026-12302, CVE-2026-12304, CVE-2026-12305, CVE-2026-12306, CVE-2026-12307, CVE-2026-12308, CVE-2026-12309, CVE-2026-12310, CVE-2026-12311, CVE-2026-12312, CVE-2026-12313, CVE-2026-12314, CVE-2026-12315, CVE-2026-12324, CVE-2026-12325, CVE-2026-12327, CVE-2026-12328, CVE-2026-12329, CVE-2026-12330

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 15 Jul 2026, 14:24 UTC

WeaknessesCWE-266, CWE-823, CWE-825 +10

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats