CVE-2024-1313VulnerabilityPublished 30 Apr 2024Updated 11 Oct 2026

SUSE · security update for grafana

Affects SUSESource GCVE Database

Mentioned vulnerabilities

CVE-2024-1394

Not known to be exploited.

Data as of 25 Oct 2026, 19:02 UTC

Severity

Medium

Rated by Threat Radar · No CVSS score from NVD or the CNA

EPSS: 0.6% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 50% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 30 Apr 2024
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 2026-10-25.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
SUSE Product Security Team SUSE	Affected Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 9) src grafana-0:9.2.10-16.el9_4.src SUSE x86_64 grafana-0:9.2.10-16.el9_4.x86_64 grafana-selinux-0:9.2.10-16.el9_4.x86_64 SUSE Linux Enterprise	Fixed in–

AI-suggested

Red Hat has released updated Grafana packages that fix these vulnerabilities. Users should apply the Grafana update (version 9.2.10-16.el9_4) for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 and ensure all previously released errata are applied before updating. Refer to Red Hat's official update instructions at https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258 for proper patch application.

Description

Grafana is an open source, feature rich metrics dashboard and graph editor for Graphite, InfluxDB & OpenTSDB. Security Fix(es): * grafana: golang-fips/openssl: Memory leaks in code encrypting and decrypting RSA payloads (CVE-2024-1394) * grafana: vulnerable to authorization bypass (CVE-2024-1313) For more details about the security issue(s), including the impact, a CVSS score, acknowledgments, and other related information, refer to the CVE page(s) listed in the References section.

Impact

The vulnerabilities could lead to resource exhaustion due to memory leaks and unauthorized access due to authorization bypass. The overall security impact is rated moderate by Red Hat Product Security. There are no known exploits in the wild at the time of the advisory.

Summary

This advisory covers two security issues in Grafana as packaged by Red Hat for Enterprise Linux 9. CVE-2024-1394 involves memory leaks in the golang-fips/openssl code used for encrypting and decrypting RSA payloads. CVE-2024-1313 is an authorization bypass vulnerability allowing unauthorized access. Red Hat has released updated Grafana packages (version 9.2.10-16.el9_4) to address these vulnerabilities. The advisory applies to multiple architectures and Extended Update Support versions of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9. No CVSS scores are provided in the advisory.

CWE-639Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key (opens in a new tab)
Base weaknessLikelihood of exploit: HighCWE Top 25 (2025): #24OWASP Top 10 A01:2025: Broken Access Control (opens in a new tab)
The system's authorization functionality does not prevent one user from gaining access to another user's data or record by modifying the key value identifying the data.
Architecture and Design
For each and every data access, ensure that the user has sufficient privilege to access the record that is being requested.
Architecture and Design · Implementation
Make sure that the key that is used in the lookup of a specific user's record is not controllable externally by the user or that any tampering can be detected.
Architecture and Design
Use encryption in order to make it more difficult to guess other legitimate values of the key or associate a digital signature with the key so that the server can verify that there has been no tampering.
OWASP Cheat Sheets
Access Control (opens in a new tab)
Authorization Testing Automation (opens in a new tab)
Cross-Site Request Forgery Prevention (opens in a new tab)
Insecure Direct Object Reference Prevention (opens in a new tab)
Authorization (opens in a new tab)
OWASP ASVS 4.0.3
V4.1.2 (opens in a new tab)
V4.2.1 (opens in a new tab)
V8.3.8 (opens in a new tab)
From MITRE CWE, MITRE CAPEC and OWASP (Top 10, OpenCRE).
CWE-401Missing Release of Memory after Effective Lifetime (opens in a new tab)
Variant weaknessLikelihood of exploit: Medium
The product does not sufficiently track and release allocated memory after it has been used, making the memory unavailable for reallocation and reuse.
Implementation · Libraries or Frameworks
Choose a language or tool that provides automatic memory management, or makes manual memory management less error-prone.
Architecture and Design
Use an abstraction library to abstract away risky APIs. Not a complete solution.
Architecture and Design · Build and Compilation
Consider using the Boehm-Demers-Weiser garbage collector (bdwgc), which can help avoid leaks.
From MITRE CWE, MITRE CAPEC and OWASP (Top 10, OpenCRE).

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 12 Aug 2026, 17:58 UTC

WeaknessesCWE-639, CWE-401

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats