Salesforce AI Agents Forced to Leak Sensitive Data
Yet again researchers have uncovered an opportunity (dubbed "ForcedLeak" for indirect prompt injection against autonomous agents lacking sufficient security controls — but this time the risk involves PII, corporate secrets, physical location data, and so much more.
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
The ForcedLeak vulnerability is an indirect prompt injection attack targeting autonomous AI agents integrated within Salesforce platforms. These AI agents, designed to automate workflows and assist in data processing, lack sufficient security controls to prevent maliciously crafted prompts from manipulating their behavior. Attackers exploit this weakness by injecting indirect prompts that cause the AI agents to disclose sensitive information, including personally identifiable information (PII), corporate secrets, and physical location data. Unlike direct code execution vulnerabilities, ForcedLeak leverages the AI's natural language processing capabilities to bypass traditional security boundaries, effectively tricking the agent into unauthorized data disclosure. The absence of affected version details and patch links suggests this is a newly identified issue without immediate remediation. Although no known exploits have been observed in the wild, the potential impact on confidentiality is significant, especially for organizations relying heavily on Salesforce AI agents for critical business functions. The vulnerability underscores the challenges of securing AI-driven autonomous systems, particularly those handling sensitive data without robust prompt validation and monitoring mechanisms.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, the ForcedLeak vulnerability poses a substantial risk to data confidentiality and corporate integrity. Leakage of PII can lead to violations of the EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), resulting in legal penalties and reputational damage. Corporate secrets exposure could undermine competitive advantage and intellectual property security. Physical location data disclosure may compromise employee safety and operational security. Organizations heavily utilizing Salesforce AI agents for customer relationship management, sales automation, or internal workflows could experience operational disruptions and loss of stakeholder trust. Additionally, the indirect nature of the attack complicates detection and response, increasing the risk of prolonged data exposure. The medium severity rating reflects the balance between the complexity of exploitation and the sensitivity of the data at risk. Proactive mitigation is essential to prevent potential breaches and comply with stringent European data protection standards.
Mitigation Recommendations
To mitigate the ForcedLeak vulnerability, European organizations should implement several specific measures beyond generic advice: 1) Enforce strict input validation and sanitization on all prompts and commands sent to Salesforce AI agents to prevent injection of malicious instructions. 2) Deploy monitoring and anomaly detection systems that analyze AI agent interactions for unusual or unauthorized data disclosure patterns. 3) Limit the scope of data accessible to AI agents by applying the principle of least privilege, ensuring agents only access data necessary for their functions. 4) Regularly audit AI agent configurations and update security policies to incorporate emerging threat intelligence related to prompt injection. 5) Collaborate with Salesforce to obtain patches or configuration guidelines as they become available and participate in responsible disclosure programs. 6) Train staff on the risks associated with AI agent interactions and establish incident response procedures tailored to AI-driven data leaks. These targeted actions will reduce the attack surface and enhance resilience against ForcedLeak exploitation.
Affected Countries
United Kingdom, Germany, France, Netherlands, Sweden, Ireland
Salesforce AI Agents Forced to Leak Sensitive Data
Description
Yet again researchers have uncovered an opportunity (dubbed "ForcedLeak" for indirect prompt injection against autonomous agents lacking sufficient security controls — but this time the risk involves PII, corporate secrets, physical location data, and so much more.
AI-Powered Analysis
Technical Analysis
The ForcedLeak vulnerability is an indirect prompt injection attack targeting autonomous AI agents integrated within Salesforce platforms. These AI agents, designed to automate workflows and assist in data processing, lack sufficient security controls to prevent maliciously crafted prompts from manipulating their behavior. Attackers exploit this weakness by injecting indirect prompts that cause the AI agents to disclose sensitive information, including personally identifiable information (PII), corporate secrets, and physical location data. Unlike direct code execution vulnerabilities, ForcedLeak leverages the AI's natural language processing capabilities to bypass traditional security boundaries, effectively tricking the agent into unauthorized data disclosure. The absence of affected version details and patch links suggests this is a newly identified issue without immediate remediation. Although no known exploits have been observed in the wild, the potential impact on confidentiality is significant, especially for organizations relying heavily on Salesforce AI agents for critical business functions. The vulnerability underscores the challenges of securing AI-driven autonomous systems, particularly those handling sensitive data without robust prompt validation and monitoring mechanisms.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, the ForcedLeak vulnerability poses a substantial risk to data confidentiality and corporate integrity. Leakage of PII can lead to violations of the EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), resulting in legal penalties and reputational damage. Corporate secrets exposure could undermine competitive advantage and intellectual property security. Physical location data disclosure may compromise employee safety and operational security. Organizations heavily utilizing Salesforce AI agents for customer relationship management, sales automation, or internal workflows could experience operational disruptions and loss of stakeholder trust. Additionally, the indirect nature of the attack complicates detection and response, increasing the risk of prolonged data exposure. The medium severity rating reflects the balance between the complexity of exploitation and the sensitivity of the data at risk. Proactive mitigation is essential to prevent potential breaches and comply with stringent European data protection standards.
Mitigation Recommendations
To mitigate the ForcedLeak vulnerability, European organizations should implement several specific measures beyond generic advice: 1) Enforce strict input validation and sanitization on all prompts and commands sent to Salesforce AI agents to prevent injection of malicious instructions. 2) Deploy monitoring and anomaly detection systems that analyze AI agent interactions for unusual or unauthorized data disclosure patterns. 3) Limit the scope of data accessible to AI agents by applying the principle of least privilege, ensuring agents only access data necessary for their functions. 4) Regularly audit AI agent configurations and update security policies to incorporate emerging threat intelligence related to prompt injection. 5) Collaborate with Salesforce to obtain patches or configuration guidelines as they become available and participate in responsible disclosure programs. 6) Train staff on the risks associated with AI agent interactions and establish incident response procedures tailored to AI-driven data leaks. These targeted actions will reduce the attack surface and enhance resilience against ForcedLeak exploitation.
Affected Countries
For access to advanced analysis and higher rate limits, contact root@offseq.com
Threat ID: 68e469f26a45552f36e90796
Added to database: 10/7/2025, 1:16:34 AM
Last enriched: 10/7/2025, 1:25:35 AM
Last updated: 11/20/2025, 1:35:56 PM
Views: 54
Community Reviews
0 reviewsCrowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.
Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.
Related Threats
Iran-Linked Hackers Mapped Ship AIS Data Days Before Real-World Missile Strike Attempt
MediumCTM360 Exposes a Global WhatsApp Hijacking Campaign: HackOnChat
MediumUS and Allies Sanction Russian Bulletproof Hosting Service Providers
MediumRecent 7-Zip Vulnerability Exploited in Attacks
CriticalCVE-2025-62346: CWE-352 Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in HCL Software Glovius Cloud
MediumActions
Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.
External Links
Need enhanced features?
Contact root@offseq.com for Pro access with improved analysis and higher rate limits.