CVE-2026-112390VulnerabilityPublished 5 Nov 2026Updated 10 Nov 2026

SUSE · Security update for python-Pillow

Affects SUSESource GCVE Database

Compare

Mentioned vulnerabilities

Authoritative record:CVE-2026-112390· High 8.2

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 8.2 High : upgrade SUSE pillow to 13.0.0 soon.

Data as of 10 Nov 2026, 23:24 UTC

CVSS 4.0 base score

8.2High

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.5% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 48% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.
Patch: Available – fixed in 13.0.0

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Attack Requirements: Present
Privileges Required: None
User Interaction: None
Vulnerable system confidentiality: None
Vulnerable system integrity: None
Vulnerable system availability: High
Subsequent system confidentiality: None
Subsequent system integrity: None
Subsequent system availability: None

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable system is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed below, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed “remotely exploitable” and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: The attacker must take no measurable action to exploit the vulnerability. The attack requires no target-specific circumvention to exploit the vulnerability. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable system.
Attack Requirements: Present: The successful attack depends on the presence of specific deployment and execution conditions of the vulnerable system that enable the attack. These include: a race condition must be won to successfully exploit the vulnerability (the successfulness of the attack is conditioned on execution conditions that are not under full control of the attacker, or the attack may need to be launched multiple times against a single target before being successful); the attacker must inject themselves into the logical network path between the target and the resource requested by the victim (e.g. vulnerabilities requiring an on-path attacker).
Privileges Required: None: The attacker is unauthorized prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files of the vulnerable system to carry out an attack.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without interaction from any human user, other than the attacker.
Vulnerable system confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system availability: High: There is a total loss of availability, resulting in the attacker being able to fully deny access to resources in the Vulnerable System; this loss is either sustained (while the attacker continues to deliver the attack) or persistent (the condition persists even after the attack has completed). Alternatively, the attacker has the ability to deny some availability, but the loss of availability presents a direct, serious consequence to the Vulnerable System (e.g., the attacker cannot disrupt existing connections, but can prevent new connections; the attacker can repeatedly exploit a vulnerability that, in each instance of a successful attack, leaks a only small amount of memory, but after repeated exploitation causes a service to become completely unavailable).
Subsequent system confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the Subsequent System or all confidentiality impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the Subsequent System or all integrity impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Subsequent System or all availability impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v4.0 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 19 Oct 2026
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponized: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 10 Nov 2026.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponized: A Metasploit exploit module or Exploit-DB entry exists (Metasploit scanner modules do not count), or CISA SSVC or the CVSS exploit maturity reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Upgrade Pillow to 13.0.0.

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
python-pillowPillow	Affected >=7.2.0 <13.0.0	Fixed in 13.0.0

Check your own hosts for these packages with threat-finder (opens in a new tab), our free open-source scanner.

Description

This update for python-Pillow fixes the following issues: - CVE-2026-96636: decompression-bomb protection bypass via multi-frame `seek()` in MPO and DCX (bsc#1286802). - CVE-2026-96637: decompression bomb check bypass in `SpiderImagePlugin.seek()` leads to unbounded allocation DoS (bsc#1286801). - CVE-2026-96638: BMP RLE decoder memory-amplification DoS via unbounded delta escape/absolute mode (bsc#1286800). - CVE-2026-96639: multi-frame loaders can reuse stale native image storage after mode transitions (bsc#1286799). - CVE-2026-96640: PDF append accepts malformed shared page-tree DAG, which can cause resource exhaustion (bsc#1286798). - CVE-2026-96641: reachable undefined behavior in native integer operations can lead to denial of service or logic integrity compromise (bsc#1286797). - CVE-2026-96642: `TarIO` negative size field causes infinite CPU-spin loop (bsc#1286796). - CVE-2026-96643: PNG eXIf chunk makes EXIF parsing run in quadratic time (bsc#1286795). - CVE-2026-96778: heap buffer overflow writing JPEG comment after ICC profile fills buffer (bsc#1286793). - CVE-2026-112390: Denial of Service via infinite loop during crafted MIC image parsing (bsc#1286256). - CVE-2026-112391: Denial of Service via unbounded recursion in PDF parser (bsc#1286273). - CVE-2026-112392: Denial of Service via zero-size images in rank filters (bsc#1286287). - CVE-2026-112393: heap buffer overflow and stale-heap disclosure in _tiffWriteProc when saving compressed TIFF data (bsc#1286325). - CVE-2026-112394: `P;2L` and `P;4L` decoders may read 1 to 3 bytes past the passed buffer size (bsc#1286311). - CVE-2026-112395: Pillow tiled-TIFF decoder reads past tile buffer in `copy4` (bsc#1286312). - CVE-2026-112396: heap use-after-free when encoding TIFF to an in-memory buffer (bsc#1286313). - CVE-2026-112397: out-of-bounds access in `_imagingmorph` on a zero-width image (bsc#1286314). - CVE-2026-112398: heap buffer overflow in FPX JPEG decoding can lead to code execution (bsc#1286406). - CVE-2026-112399: Denial of service via crafted APNG image (bsc#1286368). - CVE-2026-112400: Denial of Service via memory exhaustion from crafted GIF image (bsc#1286370). - CVE-2026-112401: Denial of Service via crafted GIF comments (bsc#1286372). - CVE-2026-112402: Denial of service via double free during image transformation (bsc#1286381). - CVE-2026-112403: heap buffer overflow in `ImagingJpegDecode` allows for code execution (bsc#1286405). - CVE-2026-112404: Denial of Service via out-of-bounds read in TIFF decoding (bsc#1286388). - CVE-2026-112405: NULL pointer dereference in `Image.merge` via an unvalidated band 0 (bsc#1286404). - CVE-2026-112406: infinite loop in `PdfParser.rewrite_pages` on page tree `Parent` cycle (bsc#1286403). - CVE-2026-112891: quadratic GIF comment copying during save (bsc#1286402). - CVE-2026-112892: MSP RLE decoder expands a tiny file into unbounded memory (bsc#1286401). - CVE-2026-112893: Denial of Service via invalid pointer free during font rendering (bsc#1286392). - CVE-2026-112894: Denial of Service via crafted multi-frame image conversion (bsc#1286408). - CVE-2026-112895: Denial of service via crafted PDF during append operations (bsc#1286411). - CVE-2026-112896: TIFF encoder `ColorMap` plane-size mismatch causes a heap out-of-bounds read (bsc#1286400). - CVE-2026-112897: `TiffDecode` returns uninitialized memory as pixels for short JPEG strips (bsc#1286398). - CVE-2026-112898: `Image.quantize()` with empty palette can leak uninitialized stack memory (bsc#1286399). - CVE-2026-112899: EPS `load(scale)` lets Ghostscript render past the decompression bomb limit (bsc#1286489). - CVE-2026-112900: argument Injection in Ghostscript call can lead to remote code execution (bsc#1286397). - CVE-2026-112901: ReDoS in `XbmImagePlugin` can be triggered by 512-byte file (bsc#1286396). - CVE-2026-112902: memory disclosure and segfault in libtiff encoder via crafted TIFF tags (bsc#1286804). - CVE-2026-114501: Arrow export leaks stale heap memory when `PILLOW_ALIGNMENT > 1` (bsc#1286803).

GCVE source: db.gcve.eu
Csaf Category: csaf_security_advisory
Csaf Version: 2.0
Publisher: SUSE Product Security Team
Advisory ID: openSUSE-SU-2026:22246-1
Vendor Severity: critical
CVE Count: 39
Additional Cves: CVE-2026-112391, CVE-2026-112392, CVE-2026-112393, CVE-2026-112394, CVE-2026-112395, CVE-2026-112396, CVE-2026-112397, CVE-2026-112398, CVE-2026-112399, CVE-2026-112400, CVE-2026-112401, CVE-2026-112402, CVE-2026-112403, CVE-2026-112404, CVE-2026-112405, CVE-2026-112406, CVE-2026-112891, CVE-2026-112892, CVE-2026-112893, CVE-2026-112894, CVE-2026-112895, CVE-2026-112896, CVE-2026-112897, CVE-2026-112898, CVE-2026-112899, CVE-2026-112900, CVE-2026-112901, CVE-2026-112902, CVE-2026-114501, CVE-2026-96636, CVE-2026-96637, CVE-2026-96638, CVE-2026-96639, CVE-2026-96640, CVE-2026-96641, CVE-2026-96642, CVE-2026-96643, CVE-2026-96778

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…