Skip to main content
VulnerabilityPublished 07/24/2026Updated 08/12/2026

Server: Budibase: OIDC SSO account takeover: incoming identity linked by email without checking email_verified (CVE-2026-73302)

Affects @budibase/serverSource GCVE Database

Severity
Critical

Rated by Threat Radar

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H

What to do

AI-suggested

Patch status is not yet confirmed — check the vendor advisory for current remediation guidance. Until an official fix is available, administrators should ensure that all configured IdPs enforce strict email verification policies (email_verified=true) before asserting email claims. Avoid trusting IdPs that allow unverified email assertions or permit self-registration without email verification. Consider disabling or restricting OIDC SSO login from IdPs with permissive email verification settings. Monitor vendor communications for updates and patches addressing this issue.

Affected software

ProductAffectedFixed in
npm@budibase/serverAffected
  • <=3.38.1
Fixed in–

Check your own hosts for these packages with threat-finder (opens in a new tab), our free open-source scanner.

Description

### Summary Budibase's OIDC SSO login links an incoming SSO identity to an existing Budibase account **by email address alone**, without ever checking the `email_verified` claim of the OIDC ID token. Budibase first tries to match the IdP `sub`; when that misses (any fresh attacker IdP account) it silently falls back to matching by the `email` claim and **merges into the existing account by email**, preserving that account's `_id` and roles. Because the `email_verified` flag is never read, an attacker who can make a **configured/trusted** IdP emit a token carrying `email = <victim>` with `email_verified = false` is logged into Budibase **as the victim**, inheriting the victim's roles (including global admin/builder). Per OIDC Core §5.7 the `email` claim MUST NOT be used as an identity key unless `email_verified` is `true`; Budibase effectively delegates all account-linking trust to every configured IdP's email-verification policy while checking nothing itself. Full account takeover of any existing Budibase user, including the instance owner. ### Details The OIDC verify callback extracts the email and never consults `email_verified`: - `packages/backend-core/src/middleware/passport/sso/oidc.ts:59` — `email: getEmail(profile, jwtClaims)`. - `getEmail` (`oidc.ts:113-135`) returns `profile._json.email` ->`jwtClaims.email` -> `preferred_username`. **No `email_verified` check.** - `buildJwtClaims` (`oidc.ts:99-107`) assembles claims from `_json.email`/`emails[0].value` — no verification flag is read. `grep -r email_verified packages/` -> 0 hits. The email is then used as the **account-linking key**: - `sso.authenticate(...)` -> `packages/backend-core/src/middleware/passport/sso/sso.ts`: - `:38,44` `users.getById(generateGlobalUserID(details.userId))` keyed on the IdP `sub`; for a fresh attacker IdP account this 404s and is swallowed (`:45-54`). - `:57-59` **fallback:** `dbUser = await users.getGlobalUserByEmail(details.email)` -> loads the **victim's** account (victim `_id` + roles) purely by email (`packages/backend-core/src/users/users.ts:100-124`, `USER_BY_EMAIL` view, no binding to the IdP `sub`). - `syncUser(...)` (`sso.ts:80,102-138`) spreads `...user`, preserving the victim `_id`/`tenantId`/`roles`; only overwrites provider fields. - `UserDB.save` (`packages/backend-core/src/users/db.ts:235`): because `ssoUser._id` is the victim's, the `_id` branch runs (`:253`), `getById(_id)` matches the victim (`:256`), the "Email address cannot be changed" guard (`:257-259`) does not fire (`dbUser.email === email`), and the `EmailUnavailableError` guard (`:269-275`) is skipped (it only runs in the `!dbUser` branch). The merge proceeds silently; a session JWT is issued for the victim. Per OIDC Core §5.7, the `email` claim MUST NOT be used as an identity key unless `email_verified` is `true`. Budibase never reads the flag. **Preconditions (attack requirement — `AT:P`):** the attacker must be able to authenticate through an IdP that the Budibase instance **trusts** AND get that IdP to assert the victim's email with `email_verified = false`. This is reachable, not exotic: - **Self-registration with an unverified email — Keycloak and Authentik ship with *"Verify Email" OFF by default*; if the trusted IdP allows public sign-up, the attacker registers a new account and simply enters `email = <victim>` at sign-up. No confirmation email is needed — the IdP stores and asserts it unverified.** - **Self-service profile editing** — many IdPs let a logged-in user change their own email without forced re-verification. - **Attacker-operated / federated IdP or permissive social login** — where the attacker controls or influences a trusted provider, or the provider asserts a user-typed (unverified) email. It is **not** exploitable through a strict corporate IdP that enforces email verification (there `email_verified = true` and the attacker cannot claim the victim's address) — which is exactly why Budibase must check the flag rather than assume every configured IdP enforces it. The defect is unconditional on the Budibase side; the attack requirement is purely the (default, common) IdP email policy. ### PoC Reproduced live on Budibase `3.39.14` (self-hosted, community license) against a stock **Keycloak 26** realm `budi` with default "Verify Email" = off; OIDC client registered and activated in Budibase. **Setup:** a pre-existing **victim** global-admin Budibase account `[email protected]` (`_id = us_1ab2dfcf…`, local account, *no IdP link*). The attacker owns their **own** IdP account (`attacker`, distinct `sub`) and can set its email attribute unverified. **Step 1 — the IdP asserts the claim (proves `email_verified=false`):** ``` POST /realms/budi/protocol/openid-connect/token (Keycloak) grant_type=password&client_id=budibase&client_secret=…&username=attacker&password=Attacker123!&scope=openid email profile -> id_token payload: { "sub":"3cf58c45-…", "preferred_username":"attacker", "email":"victim@s

Weaknesses

References