Skip to main content
VulnerabilityPublished

CVE-2026-115865: Starlet versions before 0.33 for Perl allow a request declaring a large Content-Length to kill a

Source GCVE Database

0
Compare
Authoritative record:CVE-2026-115865· High

Not known to be exploited : upgrade to 0.33 soon.

Data as of 30 Oct 2026, 17:03 UTC

Severity
High

Rated High by Threat Radar's AI analysis · CVSS not yet scored by NVD

Thin evidence

One scorer or none
Patch
Available – fixed in 0.33

Exploitation evidence

  1. Disclosed: evidence found.

    CVE published 30 Oct 2026

  2. Detectable: no evidence on record.

    No public nuclei template indexed

  3. Weaponized: no evidence on record.

    No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB

  4. Exploited in the wild: no evidence on record.

    Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation

  5. Observed by OffSeq Mirage: no evidence on record.

    No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 30 Oct 2026.

What to do

Upgrade Starlet (Perl module) to 0.33.

Affected software

ProductAffectedFixed in
StarletAffected
  • <0.33
Fixed in
  • 0.33
CPANStarletpkg:cpan/StarletOther threatsAffected
  • <0.33
Fixed in
  • 0.33

Check your own hosts for these packages with threat-finder (opens in a new tab), our free open-source scanner.

AI-suggested

If you cannot patch yet, consider limiting the size of Content-Length headers accepted or implementing request filtering to block suspiciously large Content-Length values to mitigate exploitation.

Description

Starlet versions before 0.33 for Perl contain a vulnerability where a request declaring a large Content-Length header can cause a worker process to exhaust memory and exit unexpectedly. This occurs because the request body is read in a loop that attempts to allocate a buffer equal to the declared Content-Length before any data is received, leading to an uncatchable out-of-memory error. A remote attacker can exploit this by sending small requests with large Content-Length headers to repeatedly force worker restarts.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…