Threat Intelligence Database
Comprehensive database of the latest cyber threats affecting organizations worldwide. Filter and search to find specific threat intelligence relevant to your organization.
Stop chasing alerts. Route them.
Start free, then upgrade once to turn Radar into an automated delivery engine for your security stack.
Custom feeds / Automations: email, Slack, webhooks, SIEM/MISP / API access (baseline limits)
API access activates after upgrading in Console -> Billing.
Check if your credentials are on the dark web
Instant breach scanning across billions of leaked records. Free tier available.
Filter Threats
Narrow down the results by type, severity, or affected countries
Threat Intelligence
Click on any threat for detailed analysis and mitigation recommendations
A vulnerability was determined in mifi lossless-cut up to 3.69.0. (CVE-2026-19352)CVE-2026-19352 0 A server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in mifi lossless-cut versions prior to 3.69.0 in the built-in HTTP API service component. Exploitation requires local network access and is considered highly complex and difficult. The vulnerability is behind an experimental CLI flag and may not be critical according to the project maintainer. A patch is available to address this issue. Join the discussion | GCVE Database | 08/09/2026, 15:30:28 UTC Added: 08/09/2026, 18:27:03 UTC |
CVE-2026-19352: Server-Side Request Forgery in mifi lossless-cutCVE-2026-19352 0 A vulnerability was determined in mifi lossless-cut up to 3.69.0. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the file src/main/httpServer.ts of the component Built-in HTTP API Service. Executing a manipulation can lead to server-side request forgery. The attack requires access to the local network. This attack is characterized by high complexity. The exploitation is known to be difficult. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized. This patch is called 260802348955231442c4bae6c2d9d8ede947af0a. It is best practice to apply a patch to resolve this issue. The project maintainer provides this view: "I'm not sure that this is a critical vulnerability, because it is behind an experimental CLI flag and the NTLM behavior isn't really a LosslessCut bug." The CVSS vector reflects the high level of pre-requisites. Join the discussion | CVE Database V5 | 08/09/2026, 12:15:39 UTC Added: 08/09/2026, 12:26:46 UTC |
Showing 1 to 2 of 2 results