Skip to main content

Threats Tagged 'blockchain infrastructure'

View all threats tagged with 'blockchain infrastructure'. Filter and sort to focus on specific types of threats.

Pro Console Lifetime

Stop chasing alerts. Route them.

Start free, then upgrade once to turn Radar into an automated delivery engine for your security stack.

Custom feeds / Automations: email, Slack, webhooks, SIEM/MISP / API access (baseline limits)

View Plans & Pricing

API access activates after upgrading in Console -> Billing.

Breach by OffSeqOFFSEQFRIENDS — 25% OFF

Check if your credentials are on the dark web

Instant breach scanning across billions of leaked records. Free tier available.

Scan now

Filter Threats

Narrow down the results by type, severity, or affected countries

Search threats by title, CVE ID, or description. Maximum 100 characters.
Active filters (1):Tag: blockchain infrastructure

Threats Tagged 'blockchain infrastructure'

Click on any threat for detailed analysis and mitigation recommendations

During a targeted intrusion investigation in June 2026, investigators uncovered GoCaracal, a previously undocumented modular framework written in Go. This sophisticated toolkit exists in two operational profiles: a lightweight implant for establishing access and delivering payloads, and an extended build for sustained intelligence collection with capabilities including keylogging, browser credential theft, WebRTC remote desktop, and SOCKS5 proxying. Analysis of 249 samples traced the framework's evolution from January to July 2026, revealing active development and maturation. A notable innovation includes an Ethereum smart-contract fallback mechanism enabling operators to update C2 infrastructure without redeploying malware. The activity targeted a Venezuelan communications organization using Spanish-language financial lures, weaponized SVG files, and delivery methods consistent with established tradecraft. GoCaracal was deployed alongside an updated Bandook variant, suggesting the new framework currently ...

Join the discussion

In this article Pre-encryption Encryption Post-encryption Defending against DeadLock ransomware Indicators of compromise Microsoft Threat Intelligence tracks DeadLock ransomware as an emerging financially motivated operation distinguished by its use of decentralized infrastructure to support victim communications and data leak operations. Its recovery ecosystem combines the Session messaging network with blockchain-backed services that store and deliver resources used throughout the extortion process. This architecture likely increases the resilience of portions of its communication, leak-hosting, and negotiation infrastructure, allowing DeadLock operators to recover from some disruption efforts while maintaining continuity for victims. Microsoft has observed DeadLock ransomware being deployed by multiple groups including an affiliate of the Lynx and INC ransomware ecosystems. First observed in July 2025, DeadLock operators employ double extortion tactics, encrypting victim environments while threatening to publicly release exfiltrated data. As of July 2026, the operators have published more than 80 compromised organizations on their data leak site, called the DeadLock blog, with more than half of the claimed victims in Europe. Microsoft identified DeadLock ransomware impacting organizations across information technology (IT), mining, transportation and logistics, manufacturing, hospitality, consumer goods, and other sectors in Europe, Asia, North America, South America, and Africa. The DeadLock encryptor includes a resource-aware throttling mechanism designed to maintain system responsiveness during encryption. In addition to its encryption capabilities, the ransomware also appears to implement language or country-based geofencing designed to avoid running in environments associated with former Soviet and Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS)-linked countries as well as select Middle Eastern countries, a pattern commonly observed among ransomware operators believed to operate from those regions. Together, these capabilities demonstrate how DeadLock combines established ransomware tradecraft with decentralized infrastructure designed to improve operational resilience. In this blog, we present a technical analysis of the DeadLock ransomware encryptor, covering its execution flow, defense evasion techniques, encryption design, and post-encryption behaviors, including a decentralized recovery chat system. We also provide indicators of compromise (IOCs), Microsoft Defender detections, and mitigation guidance to help organizations defend against this threat and similar ransomware activity. Pre-encryption Configuration parsing Before performing any malicious activity, the DeadLock encryptor decrypts an embedded configuration blob using XOR decoding with an 8-byte key. Below are the malware’s configuration fields and their values. Field Value Victim UID Malware public key 03bf50bbf97c4e951e66ff12b689a37a3ce675b4921e254eae76da77573843e4a9 Encryption rule 1000,05052429880,025124288000,010524288000,F991114288000 Language exclude list Geofencing language IDs (see Language geofencing ) Process stop list Processes to terminate (see Process and service termination ) Service stop list Services to stop and delete (see Process and service termination ) File exclude list Extensions and file names to avoid encrypting (see Directory traversal ) Directory exclude list Pre-traversal filter with directories to avoid encrypting (see Directory traversal ) Sub-path Exclude List Sub-paths to avoid encrypting during traversal (see Directory traversal ) Text ransom note Full text ransom note content (see Ransom notes deployment ) HTML recovery chat Full HTML/JS interactive chat page (see Recovery chat: Technical architecture ) Language geofencing As an early exit check, the malware queries the system’s default and user interface (UI) languages. If either language matches the exclude list in the configuration, the malware self-deletes immediately withou…

Join the discussion

Void Dokkaebi, also known as Famous Chollima, has evolved its operations into a self-propagating supply chain threat targeting software developers. The North Korea-aligned group uses fabricated job interviews to lure developers into cloning malicious repositories. Once compromised, the victim's machine becomes an infection vector through two mechanisms: malicious VS Code task configurations that execute automatically when workspaces are opened, and active injection of obfuscated JavaScript into source code files with Git history tampering to conceal modifications. This creates a worm-like propagation chain where each compromised developer seeds new repositories with infection vectors. Analysis in March 2026 identified over 750 infected repositories, with contamination reaching organizations including DataStax and Neutralinojs. The campaign delivers payloads via blockchain infrastructure including Tron, Aptos, and Binance Smart Chain, deploying variants of DEV#POPPER RAT and other tools to steal cryptocurre...

Join the discussion

Showing 1 to 3 of 3 results

Filters:Tag: blockchain infrastructure
Page 1 of 1
OffSeq TrainingCredly Certified

Lead Pen Test Professional

Technical5-day eLearningPECB Accredited
View courses