Threats Tagged 'cve-2025-38351'
View all threats tagged with 'cve-2025-38351'. Filter and sort to focus on specific types of threats.
Stop chasing alerts. Route them.
Start free, then upgrade once to turn Radar into an automated delivery engine for your security stack.
Custom feeds / Automations: email, Slack, webhooks, SIEM/MISP / API access (baseline limits)
API access activates after upgrading in Console -> Billing.
Check if your credentials are on the dark web
Instant breach scanning across billions of leaked records. Free tier available.
Filter Threats
Narrow down the results by type, severity, or affected countries
Threats Tagged 'cve-2025-38351'
Click on any threat for detailed analysis and mitigation recommendations
0 The kernel packages contain the Linux kernel, the core of any Linux operating system. Security Fix(es): * kernel: KVM: x86/hyper-v: Skip non-canonical addresses during PV TLB flush (CVE-2025-38351) * kernel: do_change_type(): refuse to operate on unmounted/not ours mounts (CVE-2025-38498) * kernel: NFS: Fix a race when updating an existing write (CVE-2025-39697) * kernel: kernfs: Fix UAF in polling when open file is released (CVE-2025-39881) * kernel: Bluetooth: hci_event: Fix UAF in hci_acl_create_conn_sync (CVE-2025-39982) * kernel: i40e: fix idx validation in config queues msg (CVE-2025-39971) * kernel: Bluetooth: hci_event: Fix UAF in hci_conn_tx_dequeue (CVE-2025-39983) * kernel: io_uring/waitid: always prune wait queue entry in io_waitid_wait() (CVE-2025-40047) For more details about the security issue(s), including the impact, a CVSS score, acknowledgments, and other related information, refer to the CVE page(s) listed in the References section. Join the discussion | GCVE Database | 11/17/2025, 09:52:08 UTC Added: 06/25/2026, 21:47:08 UTC |
0 The kernel packages contain the Linux kernel, the core of any Linux operating system. Security Fix(es): * kernel: security/keys: fix slab-out-of-bounds in key_task_permission (CVE-2024-50301) * kernel: KVM: x86/hyper-v: Skip non-canonical addresses during PV TLB flush (CVE-2025-38351) * kernel: wifi: ath12k: Decrement TID on RX peer frag setup error handling (CVE-2025-39761) For more details about the security issue(s), including the impact, a CVSS score, acknowledgments, and other related information, refer to the CVE page(s) listed in the References section. Join the discussion | GCVE Database | 10/06/2025, 23:22:32 UTC Added: 06/25/2026, 21:47:14 UTC |
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: KVM: x86/hyper-v: Skip non-canonical addresses during PV TLB flush In KVM guests with Hyper-V hypercalls enabled, the hypercalls HVCALL_FLUSH_VIRTUAL_ADDRESS_LIST and HVCALL_FLUSH_VIRTUAL_ADDRESS_LIST_EX allow a guest to request invalidation of portions of a virtual TLB. For this, the hypercall parameter includes a list of GVAs that are supposed to be invalidated. However, when non-canonical GVAs are passed, there is currently no filtering in place and they are eventually passed to checked invocations of INVVPID on Intel / INVLPGA on AMD. While AMD's INVLPGA silently ignores non-canonical addresses (effectively a no-op), Intel's INVVPID explicitly signals VM-Fail and ultimately triggers the WARN_ONCE in invvpid_error(): invvpid failed: ext=0x0 vpid=1 gva=0xaaaaaaaaaaaaa000 WARNING: CPU: 6 PID: 326 at arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c:482 invvpid_error+0x91/0xa0 [kvm_intel] Modules linked in: kvm_intel kvm 9pnet_virtio irqbypass fuse CPU: 6 UID: 0 PID: 326 Comm: kvm-vm Not tainted 6.15.0 #14 PREEMPT(voluntary) RIP: 0010:invvpid_error+0x91/0xa0 [kvm_intel] Call Trace: vmx_flush_tlb_gva+0x320/0x490 [kvm_intel] kvm_hv_vcpu_flush_tlb+0x24f/0x4f0 [kvm] kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run+0x3013/0x5810 [kvm] Hyper-V documents that invalid GVAs (those that are beyond a partition's GVA space) are to be ignored. While not completely clear whether this ruling also applies to non-canonical GVAs, it is likely fine to make that assumption, and manual testing on Azure confirms "real" Hyper-V interprets the specification in the same way. Skip non-canonical GVAs when processing the list of address to avoid tripping the INVVPID failure. Alternatively, KVM could filter out "bad" GVAs before inserting into the FIFO, but practically speaking the only downside of pushing validation to the final processing is that doing so is suboptimal for the guest, and no well-behaved guest will request TLB flushes for non-canonical addresses. Join the discussion | GCVE Database | 07/19/2025, 12:15:00 UTC Added: 06/25/2026, 21:47:12 UTC |
Showing 1 to 3 of 3 results