Threats Tagged 'ghsa-794r-5rp2-fpg8'

## Summary `flyto-core`'s SSRF protection (`validate_url_ssrf` / `is_private_ip` in `src/core/utils.py`) blocks private and metadata destinations by resolving the host and testing the resulting IP for membership in a hardcoded `PRIVATE_IP_RANGES` list. That list contains only the *native* RFC 1918 / loopback / link-local / unique-local ranges. It does **not** account for IPv6 transition address forms that embed an IPv4 (or loopback) target: - IPv4-mapped `::ffff:a.b.c.d` - IPv4-compatible `::a.b.c.d` - 6to4 `2002::/16` - NAT64 well-known prefix `64:ff9b::/96` and local-use `64:ff9b:1::/48` A workflow author can submit a URL with a literal transition-form host (for example `http://[::ffff:127.0.0.1]:8080/...` or `http://[64:ff9b::a9fe:a9fe]/latest/meta-data/`). `is_private_ip()` returns `False` for these (the address is not literally inside any listed range), so `validate_url_ssrf` lets the request through, and the `http.get` atomic module (and ~10 sibling modules that share the same guard) performs the outbound `aiohttp` fetch and returns the response body. On a host that uses NAT64/6to4 these addresses route to the embedded IPv4 endpoint (e.g. the cloud instance-metadata service `169.254.169.254`); on any dual-stack host the IPv4-mapped form is routed by the kernel directly to the embedded IPv4, including loopback and RFC 1918 internal services. This is CWE-918 (Server-Side Request Forgery): the guard that exists specifically to keep workflow-authored URLs away from internal/metadata endpoints is bypassable, and the response body is returned to the caller (a read SSRF). ## Affected code `src/core/utils.py`: - `PRIVATE_IP_RANGES` (around L297) — lists native ranges only; no `64:ff9b::/96`, no `2002::/16`, no `::ffff:0:0/96`, no `::/96`. - `is_private_ip(ip_str)` (around L337) — `ipaddress.ip_address(ip_str)` then membership test against `PRIVATE_IP_RANGES`. Because the test is plain network membership (not `is_global`/`is_private` predicates), it does not unwrap transition forms, so even `::ffff:127.0.0.1` — which `ipaddress` itself classifies `is_private == True` — is **not** caught here. - `validate_url_ssrf` (around L358) — resolves via `socket.getaddrinfo(hostname, None, AF_UNSPEC)` and rejects only when `is_private_ip(ip)` is `True`. - `validate_url_with_env_config(url)` (around L496) — the wrapper actually invoked by the modules. Trust boundary in `src/core/modules/atomic/http/get.py`: - L93 `url = params.get('url')` — workflow parameter, attacker-controlled by the workflow author. - L104 `validate_url_with_env_config(url)` — the guard above. - L116 `async with session.get(url, headers=headers, ssl=ssl_param) as response` — `aiohttp` fetch; the body is returned to the caller. ### How input reaches the sink (reachability) `params['url']` (L93) is fully attacker-controlled by the workflow author. It reaches the sink with no intervening sanitization other than the SSRF guard itself: L93 read → L104 `validate_url_with_env_config(url)` (the bypassed guard) → L116 `aiohttp` `session.get`. The route is `POST /v1/execute` with body `{"module_id":"http.get","params":{"url":...}}` (bearer-token authenticated; the token is the per-instance workflow-author credential), or equivalently an `http.get` node in a workflow YAML. The response body is returned in the `data.body` field, making this a read SSRF. The same guarded-then-fetch pattern is shared by the `http.{request,batch,paginate,session}`, `browser.goto`, `image.download`, `communication.webhook_trigger`, `notification.send`, `vector.connector` and `llm.chat` atomic modules. ## Impact A user who can author/execute a workflow (the product's normal untrusted-input surface — reachable over the Execution API `POST /v1/execute` with a module-execute body, or via a workflow YAML node) can drive an authenticated outbound GET to internal-only destinations that the SSRF guard is explicitly meant to block: - Cloud instance-metadata service (`169.254.169.254`, `metadata.google.internal`) on NAT64/6to4-routed hosts via `http://[64:ff9b::a9fe:a9fe]/...`, exposing IAM credentials / instance identity. - Loopback and RFC 1918 internal services on any dual-stack host via the IPv4-mapped form `http://[::ffff:127.0.0.1]:8080/...`, `http://[::ffff:10.x.x.x]/...`. The response body is returned, so this is a read SSRF (data exfiltration from internal services), not merely a blind request. Auth required = workflow author; this is precisely the input class the guard was written to constrain, and `SECURITY.md` documents the resolved-IP check as a security control, so the bypass is against the project's own stated model. CWE-918. Severity: Medium-High. ## PoC / Proof of concept ### End-to-end reproduction (against pinned version) Environment: real `flyto-core` Execution API booted from a clean install of the current default-branch HEAD (commit `4636d9f0dcf220a11cfaa1a63927b79042bfdc5c`), Python 3.12.13, `aiohttp` 3.13.5. No `FLYTO_ALLOW_PRIVATE_NETWORK` / `FLYTO_AL