Threats Tagged 'mal-2026-10090'
View all threats tagged with 'mal-2026-10090'. Filter and sort to focus on specific types of threats.
Stop chasing alerts. Route them.
Start free, then upgrade once to turn Radar into an automated delivery engine for your security stack.
Custom feeds / Automations: email, Slack, webhooks, SIEM/MISP / API access (baseline limits)
API access activates after upgrading in Console -> Billing.
Check if your credentials are on the dark web
Instant breach scanning across billions of leaked records. Free tier available.
Filter Threats
Narrow down the results by type, severity, or affected countries
Threats Tagged 'mal-2026-10090'
Click on any threat for detailed analysis and mitigation recommendations
--- _-= Per source details. Do not edit below this line.=-_ ## Source: amazon-inspector (162cd9e0496d35e0500fe084f6011a3e6893182b0fa209502c5d6017ab1138ac) The package declares `gypfile: true` with no native C/C++ sources, and its binding.gyp abuses GYP command-expansion syntax in the `sources` list — `<!(node index.js...)` with `type: none` — so that npm's automatic `node-gyp rebuild` step runs `node index.js` during install-time configure. index.js then collects installer identifiers via `os.hostname()`, `os.userInfo().username`, and the CI environment variables `GITHUB_REPOSITORY` and `RUNNER_ENVIRONMENT`, and POSTs a JSON body to a hardcoded ngrok tunnel at `crabbing-thong-overhung.ngrok-free.dev` (`https://crabbing-thong-overhung.ngrok-free.dev/?gyp_rce=1`). It also drops `GYP_STEALTH_PWNED.txt` into `GITHUB_WORKSPACE` (or cwd) whose content self-identifies as `Stealth RCE via binding.gyp!`. There are no shipped native sources for the GYP config to build; the binding.gyp exists solely to trigger the embedded JS at install. The absence of any explicit `install`/`postinstall` script masks the lifecycle execution — the trigger is `binding.gyp` presence, which npm resolves via `node-gyp rebuild`. This is a fully automatic install-time RCE and CI-reconnaissance beacon, with the ngrok destination indicating an author-controlled receiver. ## Source: ossf-package-analysis (5f02ee2873da4d092fe8c8cc7418db3d2c661a64e5015eb0505fe26e5979da80) The OpenSSF Package Analysis project identified 'nonenull1' @ 1.5.2 (npm) as malicious. It is considered malicious because: - The package communicates with a domain associated with malicious activity. Join the discussion | GCVE Database | 07/09/2026, 16:34:31 UTC Added: 07/10/2026, 09:24:28 UTC |
Showing 1 to 1 of 1 result