Threats Tagged 't1134'

Socket Threat Research team identified 19 malicious browser extensions (18 Chrome, 1 Edge) published in the last six months, delivering an extendable malware framework. These extensions establish WebSocket communication with command and control servers, strip Content Security Policy headers, and use XSS injection to execute malicious payloads. The primary focus is cryptocurrency wallet secret stealing and crypto draining. The threat actor employs two publishing approaches: creating malicious extensions from scratch or acquiring legitimate extensions with established user bases and weaponizing them. The most impactful case involves the 'Enable Right Click & Copy' extension, which had approximately 70,000 Chrome users and 10,000 Edge users when compromised. The campaign, tracked as 'Superior', has been active since February 2024, demonstrating sophisticated operational capabilities and persistent evolution of malicious modules targeting multiple cryptocurrency platforms, exchanges, and credential harvesting.

The Gentlemen is a financially motivated ransomware group operating since July 2025 using a Ransomware-as-a-Service model with dual-extortion tactics. They exfiltrate sensitive data before encrypting systems, targeting Windows, Linux, and ESXi environments. The group focuses heavily on preparation before encryption, using legitimate administrative tools like PowerRun.exe for privilege escalation, and establishing persistence through multiple mechanisms including registry modifications, scheduled tasks, and autostart configurations. They disable security tools, delete logs, terminate database and backup services, and use XChaCha20 and Curve25519 encryption. Primarily targeting medium-to-large organizations in the Asia-Pacific region, their activity has increased by 2,100% compared to typical levels. Victims receive ransom notes with approximately 10-day deadlines threatening to publish stolen data on leak sites if demands are not met.

In this article Pre-encryption Encryption Post-encryption Defending against DeadLock ransomware Indicators of compromise Microsoft Threat Intelligence tracks DeadLock ransomware as an emerging financially motivated operation distinguished by its use of decentralized infrastructure to support victim communications and data leak operations. Its recovery ecosystem combines the Session messaging network with blockchain-backed services that store and deliver resources used throughout the extortion process. This architecture likely increases the resilience of portions of its communication, leak-hosting, and negotiation infrastructure, allowing DeadLock operators to recover from some disruption efforts while maintaining continuity for victims. Microsoft has observed DeadLock ransomware being deployed by multiple groups including an affiliate of the Lynx and INC ransomware ecosystems. First observed in July 2025, DeadLock operators employ double extortion tactics, encrypting victim environments while threatening to publicly release exfiltrated data. As of July 2026, the operators have published more than 80 compromised organizations on their data leak site, called the DeadLock blog, with more than half of the claimed victims in Europe. Microsoft identified DeadLock ransomware impacting organizations across information technology (IT), mining, transportation and logistics, manufacturing, hospitality, consumer goods, and other sectors in Europe, Asia, North America, South America, and Africa. The DeadLock encryptor includes a resource-aware throttling mechanism designed to maintain system responsiveness during encryption. In addition to its encryption capabilities, the ransomware also appears to implement language or country-based geofencing designed to avoid running in environments associated with former Soviet and Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS)-linked countries as well as select Middle Eastern countries, a pattern commonly observed among ransomware operators believed to operate from those regions. Together, these capabilities demonstrate how DeadLock combines established ransomware tradecraft with decentralized infrastructure designed to improve operational resilience. In this blog, we present a technical analysis of the DeadLock ransomware encryptor, covering its execution flow, defense evasion techniques, encryption design, and post-encryption behaviors, including a decentralized recovery chat system. We also provide indicators of compromise (IOCs), Microsoft Defender detections, and mitigation guidance to help organizations defend against this threat and similar ransomware activity. Pre-encryption Configuration parsing Before performing any malicious activity, the DeadLock encryptor decrypts an embedded configuration blob using XOR decoding with an 8-byte key. Below are the malware’s configuration fields and their values. Field Value Victim UID Malware public key 03bf50bbf97c4e951e66ff12b689a37a3ce675b4921e254eae76da77573843e4a9 Encryption rule 1000,05052429880,025124288000,010524288000,F991114288000 Language exclude list Geofencing language IDs (see Language geofencing ) Process stop list Processes to terminate (see Process and service termination ) Service stop list Services to stop and delete (see Process and service termination ) File exclude list Extensions and file names to avoid encrypting (see Directory traversal ) Directory exclude list Pre-traversal filter with directories to avoid encrypting (see Directory traversal ) Sub-path Exclude List Sub-paths to avoid encrypting during traversal (see Directory traversal ) Text ransom note Full text ransom note content (see Ransom notes deployment ) HTML recovery chat Full HTML/JS interactive chat page (see Recovery chat: Technical architecture ) Language geofencing As an early exit check, the malware queries the system’s default and user interface (UI) languages. If either language matches the exclude list in the configuration, the malware self-deletes immediately withou…