AI in the Middle: Turning Web-Based AI Services into C2 Proxies & The Future Of AI Driven Attacks
Key Points Introduction AI is rapidly becoming embedded in day-to-day enterprise workflows, inside browsers, collaboration suites, and developer tooling. As a result, AI service domains increasingly blend into normal corporate traffic, often allowed by default and rarely treated as sensitive egress. Threat actors are already capitalizing on this shift. Across the malware ecosystem, AI is […] The post AI in the Middle: Turning Web-Based AI Services into C2 Proxies & The Future Of AI Driven Attacks appeared first on Check Point Research .
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
The threat titled 'AI in the Middle: Turning Web-Based AI Services into C2 Proxies & The Future Of AI Driven Attacks' describes a novel attack vector where adversaries exploit the increasing integration of AI services into enterprise environments to establish covert command and control (C2) channels. AI services, accessed via web browsers, collaboration tools, and developer platforms, generate network traffic that is typically permitted by default and not scrutinized as sensitive egress. Attackers can abuse these trusted AI service domains to proxy C2 communications, effectively hiding malicious traffic within legitimate AI interactions. This technique leverages the widespread adoption and trust of AI platforms, making detection by traditional network security tools challenging. The research highlights how AI-driven attacks may evolve, using AI services not only as attack targets but as integral components of the attack infrastructure. Although no specific vulnerable versions or exploits are currently known, the concept represents a strategic shift in attacker methodologies, emphasizing stealth and blending into normal enterprise traffic. The threat underscores the need for security teams to reconsider AI service traffic in their threat models and monitoring strategies.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, the impact of this threat could be significant due to the high adoption rates of AI services in business processes, software development, and collaboration platforms. By using AI services as C2 proxies, attackers can bypass traditional network defenses, potentially leading to prolonged undetected intrusions, data exfiltration, or lateral movement within networks. Confidentiality risks arise from the possibility of sensitive corporate data being leaked through these covert channels. Integrity and availability could also be affected if attackers use these channels to issue commands that disrupt operations or deploy additional malware payloads. The blending of malicious traffic with legitimate AI service communications complicates incident detection and response, increasing the risk of advanced persistent threats (APTs) gaining footholds in critical infrastructure or sensitive sectors. European organizations in finance, manufacturing, and government sectors, which heavily rely on AI-enhanced workflows, are particularly vulnerable to such stealthy attack vectors.
Mitigation Recommendations
To mitigate this emerging threat, European organizations should implement enhanced network monitoring that includes behavioral analysis of AI service traffic to detect anomalies indicative of C2 activity. Deploying advanced threat detection tools capable of inspecting encrypted traffic or leveraging AI-based anomaly detection can help identify suspicious patterns. Organizations should enforce strict egress filtering policies that limit AI service access to only approved domains and monitor for unusual data flows. Incorporating AI service traffic into security information and event management (SIEM) systems and threat hunting activities is critical. Employee training should emphasize the risks associated with AI services and the importance of reporting unusual system behavior. Additionally, organizations should collaborate with AI service providers to understand and implement security best practices and consider network segmentation to isolate critical assets from general AI service traffic. Regular threat intelligence updates and red teaming exercises simulating AI-based C2 attacks can improve preparedness.
Affected Countries
Germany, United Kingdom, France, Netherlands, Sweden, Belgium
AI in the Middle: Turning Web-Based AI Services into C2 Proxies & The Future Of AI Driven Attacks
Description
Key Points Introduction AI is rapidly becoming embedded in day-to-day enterprise workflows, inside browsers, collaboration suites, and developer tooling. As a result, AI service domains increasingly blend into normal corporate traffic, often allowed by default and rarely treated as sensitive egress. Threat actors are already capitalizing on this shift. Across the malware ecosystem, AI is […] The post AI in the Middle: Turning Web-Based AI Services into C2 Proxies & The Future Of AI Driven Attacks appeared first on Check Point Research .
AI-Powered Analysis
Technical Analysis
The threat titled 'AI in the Middle: Turning Web-Based AI Services into C2 Proxies & The Future Of AI Driven Attacks' describes a novel attack vector where adversaries exploit the increasing integration of AI services into enterprise environments to establish covert command and control (C2) channels. AI services, accessed via web browsers, collaboration tools, and developer platforms, generate network traffic that is typically permitted by default and not scrutinized as sensitive egress. Attackers can abuse these trusted AI service domains to proxy C2 communications, effectively hiding malicious traffic within legitimate AI interactions. This technique leverages the widespread adoption and trust of AI platforms, making detection by traditional network security tools challenging. The research highlights how AI-driven attacks may evolve, using AI services not only as attack targets but as integral components of the attack infrastructure. Although no specific vulnerable versions or exploits are currently known, the concept represents a strategic shift in attacker methodologies, emphasizing stealth and blending into normal enterprise traffic. The threat underscores the need for security teams to reconsider AI service traffic in their threat models and monitoring strategies.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, the impact of this threat could be significant due to the high adoption rates of AI services in business processes, software development, and collaboration platforms. By using AI services as C2 proxies, attackers can bypass traditional network defenses, potentially leading to prolonged undetected intrusions, data exfiltration, or lateral movement within networks. Confidentiality risks arise from the possibility of sensitive corporate data being leaked through these covert channels. Integrity and availability could also be affected if attackers use these channels to issue commands that disrupt operations or deploy additional malware payloads. The blending of malicious traffic with legitimate AI service communications complicates incident detection and response, increasing the risk of advanced persistent threats (APTs) gaining footholds in critical infrastructure or sensitive sectors. European organizations in finance, manufacturing, and government sectors, which heavily rely on AI-enhanced workflows, are particularly vulnerable to such stealthy attack vectors.
Mitigation Recommendations
To mitigate this emerging threat, European organizations should implement enhanced network monitoring that includes behavioral analysis of AI service traffic to detect anomalies indicative of C2 activity. Deploying advanced threat detection tools capable of inspecting encrypted traffic or leveraging AI-based anomaly detection can help identify suspicious patterns. Organizations should enforce strict egress filtering policies that limit AI service access to only approved domains and monitor for unusual data flows. Incorporating AI service traffic into security information and event management (SIEM) systems and threat hunting activities is critical. Employee training should emphasize the risks associated with AI services and the importance of reporting unusual system behavior. Additionally, organizations should collaborate with AI service providers to understand and implement security best practices and consider network segmentation to isolate critical assets from general AI service traffic. Regular threat intelligence updates and red teaming exercises simulating AI-based C2 attacks can improve preparedness.
Affected Countries
Technical Details
- Article Source
- {"url":"https://research.checkpoint.com/2026/ai-in-the-middle-turning-web-based-ai-services-into-c2-proxies-the-future-of-ai-driven-attacks/","fetched":true,"fetchedAt":"2026-02-18T10:16:18.801Z","wordCount":4042}
Threat ID: 6995917280d747be205e4203
Added to database: 2/18/2026, 10:16:18 AM
Last enriched: 2/18/2026, 10:16:34 AM
Last updated: 2/21/2026, 12:17:31 AM
Views: 24
Community Reviews
0 reviewsCrowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.
Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.
Related Threats
Researchers Show Copilot and Grok Can Be Abused as Malware C2 Proxies
LowWebinar: How Modern SOC Teams Use AI and Context to Investigate Cloud Breaches Faster
MediumWeekly Recap: Outlook Add-Ins Hijack, 0-Day Patches, Wormable Botnet & AI Malware
LowMicrosoft Finds “Summarize with AI” Prompts Manipulating Chatbot Recommendations
Medium2026 64-Bits Malware Trend, (Mon, Feb 16th)
LowActions
Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.
External Links
Need more coverage?
Upgrade to Pro Console in Console -> Billing for AI refresh and higher limits.
For incident response and remediation, OffSeq services can help resolve threats faster.