Casdoor 2.55.0 - Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
Casdoor 2.55.0 - Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
The identified security threat is a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Casdoor version 2.55.0, an open-source identity and access management (IAM) platform. CSRF vulnerabilities occur when an attacker tricks an authenticated user into submitting a forged HTTP request, causing the victim's browser to perform unwanted actions on a web application in which they are authenticated. In this case, the vulnerability allows attackers to potentially execute unauthorized commands or change configurations within Casdoor by exploiting the trust between the user's browser and the Casdoor server. The absence of CSRF protections such as anti-CSRF tokens or proper origin validation in the affected version enables this attack vector. Although no specific affected versions or patches are listed, the vulnerability is classified as medium severity, indicating a moderate risk level. Exploitation requires the victim to be logged into Casdoor and to visit a malicious website or click on a crafted link, which then triggers the unauthorized request. This vulnerability could lead to unauthorized changes in user permissions, session hijacking, or manipulation of authentication flows, undermining the integrity and security of the IAM system. No known exploits have been reported in the wild, but the risk remains significant for organizations relying on Casdoor for critical authentication services.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, this CSRF vulnerability in Casdoor poses risks primarily to the confidentiality and integrity of authentication and authorization processes. Unauthorized actions performed via CSRF could lead to privilege escalation, unauthorized access to sensitive data, or disruption of authentication workflows. Organizations using Casdoor for managing user identities, single sign-on (SSO), or access control in critical systems may experience compromised user accounts or altered permissions, potentially affecting business operations and regulatory compliance, especially under GDPR. The impact is heightened in sectors such as finance, healthcare, and government, where identity management integrity is crucial. While availability impact is generally limited in CSRF cases, indirect effects such as account lockouts or configuration changes could disrupt services. The lack of known exploits suggests a window for proactive mitigation, but the medium severity indicates that exploitation could have meaningful consequences if left unaddressed.
Mitigation Recommendations
To mitigate this CSRF vulnerability in Casdoor 2.55.0, organizations should implement several specific measures: 1) Apply or develop patches that introduce anti-CSRF tokens in all state-changing HTTP requests to ensure requests originate from legitimate users. 2) Enforce strict validation of the HTTP Referer and Origin headers to verify request sources. 3) Implement SameSite cookie attributes (preferably 'Strict' or 'Lax') to restrict cookie transmission in cross-site contexts. 4) Conduct thorough code reviews and security testing focusing on CSRF protections in the Casdoor deployment. 5) Educate users about the risks of clicking unknown links or visiting untrusted websites while authenticated. 6) Monitor logs for unusual or unauthorized actions that could indicate exploitation attempts. 7) If possible, upgrade to a newer Casdoor version that addresses this vulnerability once available. 8) Employ web application firewalls (WAFs) with CSRF detection capabilities as an additional layer of defense. These targeted actions go beyond generic advice by focusing on the specific nature of the vulnerability and the operational context of Casdoor deployments.
Affected Countries
Germany, France, United Kingdom, Netherlands, Sweden, Finland, Estonia
Casdoor 2.55.0 - Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
Description
Casdoor 2.55.0 - Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
AI-Powered Analysis
Technical Analysis
The identified security threat is a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Casdoor version 2.55.0, an open-source identity and access management (IAM) platform. CSRF vulnerabilities occur when an attacker tricks an authenticated user into submitting a forged HTTP request, causing the victim's browser to perform unwanted actions on a web application in which they are authenticated. In this case, the vulnerability allows attackers to potentially execute unauthorized commands or change configurations within Casdoor by exploiting the trust between the user's browser and the Casdoor server. The absence of CSRF protections such as anti-CSRF tokens or proper origin validation in the affected version enables this attack vector. Although no specific affected versions or patches are listed, the vulnerability is classified as medium severity, indicating a moderate risk level. Exploitation requires the victim to be logged into Casdoor and to visit a malicious website or click on a crafted link, which then triggers the unauthorized request. This vulnerability could lead to unauthorized changes in user permissions, session hijacking, or manipulation of authentication flows, undermining the integrity and security of the IAM system. No known exploits have been reported in the wild, but the risk remains significant for organizations relying on Casdoor for critical authentication services.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, this CSRF vulnerability in Casdoor poses risks primarily to the confidentiality and integrity of authentication and authorization processes. Unauthorized actions performed via CSRF could lead to privilege escalation, unauthorized access to sensitive data, or disruption of authentication workflows. Organizations using Casdoor for managing user identities, single sign-on (SSO), or access control in critical systems may experience compromised user accounts or altered permissions, potentially affecting business operations and regulatory compliance, especially under GDPR. The impact is heightened in sectors such as finance, healthcare, and government, where identity management integrity is crucial. While availability impact is generally limited in CSRF cases, indirect effects such as account lockouts or configuration changes could disrupt services. The lack of known exploits suggests a window for proactive mitigation, but the medium severity indicates that exploitation could have meaningful consequences if left unaddressed.
Mitigation Recommendations
To mitigate this CSRF vulnerability in Casdoor 2.55.0, organizations should implement several specific measures: 1) Apply or develop patches that introduce anti-CSRF tokens in all state-changing HTTP requests to ensure requests originate from legitimate users. 2) Enforce strict validation of the HTTP Referer and Origin headers to verify request sources. 3) Implement SameSite cookie attributes (preferably 'Strict' or 'Lax') to restrict cookie transmission in cross-site contexts. 4) Conduct thorough code reviews and security testing focusing on CSRF protections in the Casdoor deployment. 5) Educate users about the risks of clicking unknown links or visiting untrusted websites while authenticated. 6) Monitor logs for unusual or unauthorized actions that could indicate exploitation attempts. 7) If possible, upgrade to a newer Casdoor version that addresses this vulnerability once available. 8) Employ web application firewalls (WAFs) with CSRF detection capabilities as an additional layer of defense. These targeted actions go beyond generic advice by focusing on the specific nature of the vulnerability and the operational context of Casdoor deployments.
Affected Countries
For access to advanced analysis and higher rate limits, contact root@offseq.com
Threat ID: 68db38bba473ffe031e362e2
Added to database: 9/30/2025, 1:56:11 AM
Last enriched: 10/7/2025, 11:47:39 AM
Last updated: 10/7/2025, 1:37:16 PM
Views: 11
Community Reviews
0 reviewsCrowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.
Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.
Related Threats
Hackers Stole Data From Public Safety Comms Firm BK Technologies
MediumCVE-2025-11396: SQL Injection in code-projects Simple Food Ordering System
MediumCVE-2025-40888: CWE-89 Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') in Nozomi Networks Guardian
MediumCVE-2025-40887: CWE-89 Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') in Nozomi Networks Guardian
MediumCVE-2025-40885: CWE-89 Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') in Nozomi Networks Guardian
MediumActions
Updates to AI analysis are available only with a Pro account. Contact root@offseq.com for access.
External Links
Need enhanced features?
Contact root@offseq.com for Pro access with improved analysis and higher rate limits.