Skip to main content
Press slash or control plus K to focus the search. Use the arrow keys to navigate results and press enter to open a threat.
Reconnecting to live updates…

CVE-2023-30589: Vulnerability in NodeJS Node

0
Unknown
VulnerabilityCVE-2023-30589cvecve-2023-30589
Published: Fri Jun 30 2023 (06/30/2023, 23:39:59 UTC)
Source: CVE
Vendor/Project: NodeJS
Product: Node

Description

The llhttp parser in the http module in Node v20.2.0 does not strictly use the CRLF sequence to delimit HTTP requests. This can lead to HTTP Request Smuggling (HRS). The CR character (without LF) is sufficient to delimit HTTP header fields in the llhttp parser. According to RFC7230 section 3, only the CRLF sequence should delimit each header-field. This impacts all Node.js active versions: v16, v18, and, v20

AI-Powered Analysis

AILast updated: 11/05/2025, 01:02:20 UTC

Technical Analysis

CVE-2023-30589 identifies a vulnerability in the llhttp parser component of the Node.js HTTP module, present in all active Node.js versions including v16, v18, and v20. The vulnerability stems from the parser's failure to strictly enforce the HTTP header delimiter sequence as specified in RFC7230 section 3, which mandates CRLF (carriage return followed by line feed) to separate header fields. Instead, the parser accepts a single CR character as a valid delimiter. This deviation allows attackers to craft specially formed HTTP requests that exploit this parsing inconsistency to perform HTTP Request Smuggling (HRS). HRS attacks manipulate the way front-end servers and backend services parse HTTP requests, potentially enabling attackers to bypass security controls, poison caches, or hijack user sessions. The vulnerability affects all Node.js versions from 4.0 through 20.0, indicating a long-standing issue. Although no public exploits have been reported yet, the widespread use of Node.js in web servers and APIs makes this a significant concern. The lack of a CVSS score suggests the need for careful severity assessment based on impact and exploitability. The vulnerability does not require authentication but does require an attacker to send crafted HTTP requests, which is feasible in many web-facing scenarios. The broad version impact and potential for serious security consequences highlight the importance of timely mitigation.

Potential Impact

For European organizations, this vulnerability poses a significant risk due to the widespread use of Node.js in web applications, microservices, and APIs. Exploitation could lead to HTTP Request Smuggling attacks that bypass security controls such as WAFs and reverse proxies, enabling attackers to access unauthorized data, hijack user sessions, or poison web caches. This can compromise confidentiality and integrity of sensitive data and disrupt availability by causing unexpected application behavior. Organizations in sectors such as finance, healthcare, e-commerce, and government, which rely heavily on Node.js for critical services, could face data breaches or service disruptions. The vulnerability's presence across many Node.js versions increases the attack surface, especially in environments where upgrading Node.js is delayed due to compatibility concerns. Given the lack of known exploits, the immediate risk may be moderate, but the potential impact if exploited is high. European entities with strict data protection regulations (e.g., GDPR) must consider the compliance implications of such vulnerabilities.

Mitigation Recommendations

1. Monitor official Node.js channels for patches addressing CVE-2023-30589 and apply updates promptly once available. 2. In the interim, implement strict input validation on HTTP headers to reject requests containing lone CR characters as delimiters. 3. Deploy or update Web Application Firewalls (WAFs) and reverse proxies to detect and block malformed HTTP requests that deviate from RFC7230 standards. 4. Conduct thorough code reviews and penetration testing focusing on HTTP request parsing and handling in Node.js applications. 5. Segment and isolate critical backend services to limit the impact of potential request smuggling attacks. 6. Educate development and security teams about HTTP Request Smuggling risks and ensure secure coding practices around HTTP parsing. 7. Monitor logs for anomalies indicative of request smuggling attempts, such as unexpected request boundaries or header anomalies. 8. Consider using alternative HTTP parsing libraries or middleware that strictly enforce RFC7230 compliance if patching is delayed.

Need more detailed analysis?Get Pro

Technical Details

Data Version
5.1
Assigner Short Name
hackerone
Date Reserved
2023-04-13T01:00:12.086Z
Cisa Enriched
false
Cvss Version
null
State
PUBLISHED

Threat ID: 682d983ac4522896dcbed530

Added to database: 5/21/2025, 9:09:14 AM

Last enriched: 11/5/2025, 1:02:20 AM

Last updated: 12/3/2025, 12:01:31 PM

Views: 41

Community Reviews

0 reviews

Crowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.

Sort by
Loading community insights…

Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.

Actions

PRO

Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.

Please log in to the Console to use AI analysis features.

Need enhanced features?

Contact root@offseq.com for Pro access with improved analysis and higher rate limits.

Latest Threats