CVE-2023-3347: Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature in Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8
A vulnerability was found in Samba's SMB2 packet signing mechanism. The SMB2 packet signing is not enforced if an admin configured "server signing = required" or for SMB2 connections to Domain Controllers where SMB2 packet signing is mandatory. This flaw allows an attacker to perform attacks, such as a man-in-the-middle attack, by intercepting the network traffic and modifying the SMB2 messages between client and server, affecting the integrity of the data.
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
CVE-2023-3347 identifies a vulnerability in the SMB2 packet signing implementation within Samba on Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8. SMB2 packet signing is designed to ensure the integrity and authenticity of SMB messages exchanged between clients and servers. However, this vulnerability stems from improper enforcement of SMB2 packet signing under specific conditions: when an administrator configures the server with 'server signing = required' or when SMB2 connections are made to Domain Controllers where signing is mandatory. In these scenarios, the SMB2 packet signing mechanism can be bypassed or not properly verified, allowing an attacker positioned as a man-in-the-middle to intercept and alter SMB2 packets without detection. This compromises the integrity of the data transmitted over SMB2, potentially enabling malicious modifications to file shares or other SMB-based communications. The vulnerability does not affect confidentiality or availability directly but undermines trust in the integrity of SMB communications. Exploitation requires network access to the SMB service but does not require authentication or user interaction, increasing the attack surface. The CVSS v3.1 score of 5.9 reflects a medium severity, considering the attack vector is network-based with high attack complexity and no privileges required. No public exploits or active exploitation have been reported to date. The vulnerability is classified under CWE-924, which relates to improper verification of cryptographic signatures. Mitigation will rely on patching Samba or Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 once fixes are released and reviewing SMB signing policies to ensure enforcement is effective.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, this vulnerability poses a significant risk to the integrity of SMB communications, particularly in environments where Samba servers running on Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 are used to provide file sharing or domain controller services. Man-in-the-middle attacks could allow adversaries to alter files or commands transmitted over SMB, potentially leading to data corruption, unauthorized changes, or disruption of business processes relying on SMB shares. This is especially critical for enterprises integrating Samba with Active Directory Domain Controllers, as compromised SMB integrity could affect authentication and authorization workflows. While confidentiality and availability are not directly impacted, the integrity breach can undermine trust in critical data and systems. Organizations in sectors such as finance, government, healthcare, and manufacturing, which heavily rely on secure file sharing and domain services, may face operational and compliance risks. The medium severity rating suggests that while exploitation is not trivial, the potential impact on data integrity warrants prompt attention. The absence of known exploits in the wild reduces immediate risk but should not lead to complacency.
Mitigation Recommendations
1. Monitor Red Hat and Samba vendor advisories closely and apply security patches or updates as soon as they become available to address CVE-2023-3347. 2. Review and audit SMB signing configurations on all Samba servers, ensuring that 'server signing = required' is correctly enforced and that SMB2 packet signing cannot be bypassed. 3. For environments using Domain Controllers, verify that SMB2 packet signing is properly mandated and enforced on all SMB connections. 4. Employ network segmentation and monitoring to detect unusual SMB traffic patterns that could indicate man-in-the-middle attempts. 5. Use network-level protections such as IPsec or VPNs to secure SMB traffic and reduce exposure to interception. 6. Conduct regular security assessments and penetration tests focusing on SMB services to identify potential weaknesses. 7. Educate system administrators about the risks of improper SMB signing configurations and the importance of timely patching. 8. Consider deploying intrusion detection/prevention systems capable of analyzing SMB traffic integrity. 9. Maintain robust logging and alerting on SMB server activities to facilitate rapid incident response if exploitation is suspected.
Affected Countries
Germany, France, United Kingdom, Netherlands, Italy, Spain, Sweden
CVE-2023-3347: Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature in Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8
Description
A vulnerability was found in Samba's SMB2 packet signing mechanism. The SMB2 packet signing is not enforced if an admin configured "server signing = required" or for SMB2 connections to Domain Controllers where SMB2 packet signing is mandatory. This flaw allows an attacker to perform attacks, such as a man-in-the-middle attack, by intercepting the network traffic and modifying the SMB2 messages between client and server, affecting the integrity of the data.
AI-Powered Analysis
Technical Analysis
CVE-2023-3347 identifies a vulnerability in the SMB2 packet signing implementation within Samba on Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8. SMB2 packet signing is designed to ensure the integrity and authenticity of SMB messages exchanged between clients and servers. However, this vulnerability stems from improper enforcement of SMB2 packet signing under specific conditions: when an administrator configures the server with 'server signing = required' or when SMB2 connections are made to Domain Controllers where signing is mandatory. In these scenarios, the SMB2 packet signing mechanism can be bypassed or not properly verified, allowing an attacker positioned as a man-in-the-middle to intercept and alter SMB2 packets without detection. This compromises the integrity of the data transmitted over SMB2, potentially enabling malicious modifications to file shares or other SMB-based communications. The vulnerability does not affect confidentiality or availability directly but undermines trust in the integrity of SMB communications. Exploitation requires network access to the SMB service but does not require authentication or user interaction, increasing the attack surface. The CVSS v3.1 score of 5.9 reflects a medium severity, considering the attack vector is network-based with high attack complexity and no privileges required. No public exploits or active exploitation have been reported to date. The vulnerability is classified under CWE-924, which relates to improper verification of cryptographic signatures. Mitigation will rely on patching Samba or Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 once fixes are released and reviewing SMB signing policies to ensure enforcement is effective.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, this vulnerability poses a significant risk to the integrity of SMB communications, particularly in environments where Samba servers running on Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 are used to provide file sharing or domain controller services. Man-in-the-middle attacks could allow adversaries to alter files or commands transmitted over SMB, potentially leading to data corruption, unauthorized changes, or disruption of business processes relying on SMB shares. This is especially critical for enterprises integrating Samba with Active Directory Domain Controllers, as compromised SMB integrity could affect authentication and authorization workflows. While confidentiality and availability are not directly impacted, the integrity breach can undermine trust in critical data and systems. Organizations in sectors such as finance, government, healthcare, and manufacturing, which heavily rely on secure file sharing and domain services, may face operational and compliance risks. The medium severity rating suggests that while exploitation is not trivial, the potential impact on data integrity warrants prompt attention. The absence of known exploits in the wild reduces immediate risk but should not lead to complacency.
Mitigation Recommendations
1. Monitor Red Hat and Samba vendor advisories closely and apply security patches or updates as soon as they become available to address CVE-2023-3347. 2. Review and audit SMB signing configurations on all Samba servers, ensuring that 'server signing = required' is correctly enforced and that SMB2 packet signing cannot be bypassed. 3. For environments using Domain Controllers, verify that SMB2 packet signing is properly mandated and enforced on all SMB connections. 4. Employ network segmentation and monitoring to detect unusual SMB traffic patterns that could indicate man-in-the-middle attempts. 5. Use network-level protections such as IPsec or VPNs to secure SMB traffic and reduce exposure to interception. 6. Conduct regular security assessments and penetration tests focusing on SMB services to identify potential weaknesses. 7. Educate system administrators about the risks of improper SMB signing configurations and the importance of timely patching. 8. Consider deploying intrusion detection/prevention systems capable of analyzing SMB traffic integrity. 9. Maintain robust logging and alerting on SMB server activities to facilitate rapid incident response if exploitation is suspected.
Affected Countries
For access to advanced analysis and higher rate limits, contact root@offseq.com
Technical Details
- Data Version
- 5.1
- Assigner Short Name
- redhat
- Date Reserved
- 2023-06-21T04:43:49.434Z
- Cvss Version
- 3.1
- State
- PUBLISHED
Threat ID: 68e84755ba0e608b4faf9c15
Added to database: 10/9/2025, 11:37:57 PM
Last enriched: 10/9/2025, 11:53:36 PM
Last updated: 10/10/2025, 4:21:06 AM
Views: 5
Community Reviews
0 reviewsCrowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.
Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.
Related Threats
CVE-2025-11554: Insecure Inherited Permissions in Portabilis i-Educar
MediumCVE-2025-11556: SQL Injection in code-projects Simple Leave Manager
MediumCVE-2025-11555: SQL Injection in Campcodes Online Learning Management System
MediumCVE-2025-11450: CWE-79 Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation (XSS or 'Cross-site Scripting') in ServiceNow ServiceNow AI Platform
MediumCVE-2025-11449: CWE-79 Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation (XSS or 'Cross-site Scripting') in ServiceNow ServiceNow AI Platform
MediumActions
Updates to AI analysis are available only with a Pro account. Contact root@offseq.com for access.
Need enhanced features?
Contact root@offseq.com for Pro access with improved analysis and higher rate limits.