CVE-2023-35791VulnerabilityPublished 31 Jul 2023Updated 30 May 2025

CVE-2023-35791: n/a

Source CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 6.1 Medium.

Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 07:57 UTC

CVSS 3.1 base score

6.1Medium

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.3% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 26% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

CVSS:3.1/AC:L/AV:N/A:N/C:L/I:L/PR:N/S:C/UI:R

Attack Complexity: Low
Attack Vector: Network
Availability: None
Confidentiality: Low
Integrity: Low
Privileges Required: None
Scope: Changed
User Interaction: Required

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Complexity: Low: Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable component.
Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable component is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed 'remotely exploitable' and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the impacted component.
Confidentiality: Low: There is some loss of confidentiality. Access to some restricted information is obtained, but the attacker does not have control over what information is obtained, or the amount or kind of loss is limited. The information disclosure does not cause a direct, serious loss to the impacted component.
Integrity: Low: Modification of data is possible, but the attacker does not have control over the consequence of a modification, or the amount of modification is limited. The data modification does not have a direct, serious impact on the impacted component.
Privileges Required: None: The attacker is unauthorized prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files to carry out an attack.
Scope: Changed: An exploited vulnerability can affect resources beyond the security scope managed by the security authority of the vulnerable component. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are different and managed by different security authorities.
User Interaction: Required: Successful exploitation of this vulnerability requires a user to take some action before the vulnerability can be exploited.

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v3.1 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 31 Jul 2023
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 2026-10-26.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
n/a n/a	Affected =2.6.0.3	Fixed in–

AI-suggested

Specific mitigation steps include: 1) Immediately review and apply any available patches or updates from Vound for Intella Connect, even if not explicitly linked, by contacting the vendor or monitoring their security advisories. 2) Implement strict input validation and URL whitelisting on any web components that handle redirects to ensure only trusted URLs are allowed. 3) Use web application firewalls (WAFs) to detect and block suspicious redirect patterns and malicious URLs. 4) Enhance user training programs to educate employees about the risks of clicking on unexpected or suspicious links, especially those appearing to come from internal tools. 5) Monitor logs for unusual redirect activity or spikes in traffic to external URLs from the Intella Connect environment. 6) Consider implementing multi-factor authentication (MFA) to reduce the impact of credential theft resulting from phishing attacks leveraging this vulnerability. 7) If possible, isolate or restrict access to the Intella Connect web interface to trusted networks or VPNs to reduce exposure.

Description

Vound Intella Connect 2.6.0.3 has an Open Redirect vulnerability.

Impact

For European organizations using Vound Intella Connect 2.6.0.3, this vulnerability poses a risk primarily related to phishing and social engineering attacks facilitated by the open redirect. Attackers could exploit this to redirect employees or clients to malicious websites that harvest credentials, deliver malware, or conduct further attacks. The impact on confidentiality and integrity is moderate due to the potential for credential theft or session hijacking if combined with other vulnerabilities or attack vectors. Availability is not directly impacted by this vulnerability. Given that Vound Intella Connect is used for eDiscovery and data analysis, organizations handling sensitive legal or investigative data could face reputational damage and compliance risks if attackers leverage this vulnerability to compromise user trust or gain indirect access to sensitive information. The requirement for user interaction means that effective user awareness and training can reduce risk, but the vulnerability still represents a vector for targeted attacks, especially in environments with high-value data or regulatory scrutiny such as GDPR compliance in Europe.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 8 Jul 2025, 15:58 UTC

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats