Skip to main content

CVE-2023-51701: CWE-444: Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests ('HTTP Request/Response Smuggling') in fastify fastify-reply-from

Medium
VulnerabilityCVE-2023-51701cvecve-2023-51701cwe-444
Published: Mon Jan 08 2024 (01/08/2024, 13:55:05 UTC)
Source: CVE Database V5
Vendor/Project: fastify
Product: fastify-reply-from

Description

fastify-reply-from is a Fastify plugin to forward the current HTTP request to another server. A reverse proxy server built with `@fastify/reply-from` could misinterpret the incoming body by passing an header `ContentType: application/json ; charset=utf-8`. This can lead to bypass of security checks. This vulnerability has been patched in '@fastify/reply-from` version 9.6.0.

AI-Powered Analysis

AILast updated: 07/04/2025, 02:57:23 UTC

Technical Analysis

CVE-2023-51701 is a medium-severity vulnerability classified under CWE-444, which pertains to inconsistent interpretation of HTTP requests, commonly known as HTTP Request/Response Smuggling. This vulnerability affects the Fastify plugin 'fastify-reply-from', a tool used to forward HTTP requests to other servers, often employed in reverse proxy configurations. The issue arises when the plugin misinterprets the incoming HTTP request body if the 'Content-Type' header is set with a value such as 'application/json ; charset=utf-8' (note the space before the semicolon). This subtle formatting causes the plugin to incorrectly parse the header, leading to a bypass of security checks that rely on accurate content-type validation. Essentially, an attacker could craft malicious HTTP requests that exploit this parsing inconsistency to smuggle requests past security controls, potentially allowing unauthorized access or manipulation of backend services. The vulnerability affects all versions of '@fastify/reply-from' prior to 9.6.0, where the issue has been patched. The CVSS v3.1 base score is 5.3, indicating a medium severity with network attack vector, low attack complexity, no privileges required, no user interaction, and limited confidentiality impact without affecting integrity or availability. No known exploits are currently reported in the wild, but the nature of HTTP request smuggling vulnerabilities historically allows attackers to bypass security mechanisms such as firewalls, WAFs, or reverse proxies, which can lead to further exploitation.

Potential Impact

For European organizations, the impact of this vulnerability can be significant, especially for those relying on Fastify-based reverse proxy setups using the 'fastify-reply-from' plugin. HTTP request smuggling can enable attackers to bypass security controls, potentially exposing internal services or sensitive data that should be protected. This could lead to unauthorized access to internal APIs, session hijacking, or injection of malicious payloads into backend systems. Given the medium severity and limited confidentiality impact, the immediate risk is moderate; however, in complex environments, this vulnerability could be chained with other exploits to escalate privileges or exfiltrate data. Organizations in sectors such as finance, healthcare, and critical infrastructure, which often deploy reverse proxies for load balancing and security, may face increased risk. Additionally, the vulnerability's exploitation does not require authentication or user interaction, increasing the attack surface. The absence of known exploits in the wild suggests that proactive patching can effectively mitigate risk before widespread exploitation occurs.

Mitigation Recommendations

European organizations should prioritize upgrading '@fastify/reply-from' to version 9.6.0 or later, where the vulnerability is patched. Beyond upgrading, organizations should audit their HTTP header parsing logic and ensure strict validation of 'Content-Type' headers to prevent malformed or ambiguous values. Implementing comprehensive logging and monitoring of HTTP traffic for unusual header formats or anomalies can help detect attempted exploitation. Network-level protections such as Web Application Firewalls (WAFs) should be configured to detect and block HTTP request smuggling patterns, including malformed headers or unexpected whitespace in header values. Security teams should conduct penetration testing focused on HTTP request smuggling to identify any residual vulnerabilities in their proxy configurations. Finally, developers should review and harden any custom middleware or plugins that handle HTTP headers to ensure consistent and secure parsing.

Need more detailed analysis?Get Pro

Technical Details

Data Version
5.1
Assigner Short Name
GitHub_M
Date Reserved
2023-12-21T21:32:12.991Z
Cvss Version
3.1
State
PUBLISHED

Threat ID: 683f0dc2182aa0cae27ff3bc

Added to database: 6/3/2025, 2:59:14 PM

Last enriched: 7/4/2025, 2:57:23 AM

Last updated: 8/4/2025, 3:03:42 PM

Views: 13

Actions

PRO

Updates to AI analysis are available only with a Pro account. Contact root@offseq.com for access.

Please log in to the Console to use AI analysis features.

Need enhanced features?

Contact root@offseq.com for Pro access with improved analysis and higher rate limits.

Latest Threats