CVE-2023-51767: n/a
OpenSSH through 10.0, when common types of DRAM are used, might allow row hammer attacks (for authentication bypass) because the integer value of authenticated in mm_answer_authpassword does not resist flips of a single bit. NOTE: this is applicable to a certain threat model of attacker-victim co-location in which the attacker has user privileges. NOTE: this is disputed by the Supplier, who states "we do not consider it to be the application's responsibility to defend against platform architectural weaknesses."
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
CVE-2023-51767 identifies a vulnerability in OpenSSH versions through 10.0 related to susceptibility to row hammer attacks on DRAM memory. Row hammer is a hardware-based fault injection technique where repeatedly accessing (hammering) certain rows of DRAM can induce bit flips in adjacent memory rows. In this case, the vulnerability concerns the integer value of the 'authenticated' variable in the mm_answer_authpassword function, which is used to determine if a user has successfully authenticated. Because this integer does not have protections against single-bit flips, an attacker who can induce a bit flip via row hammer could potentially alter the authentication state, effectively bypassing authentication checks. This attack requires a threat model where the attacker and victim are co-located on the same physical machine, and the attacker already has user-level privileges, which limits the attack surface. The supplier has disputed the applicability of this vulnerability, arguing that defending against hardware architectural weaknesses is outside the scope of the application. No CVSS score has been assigned, and no patches or known exploits are currently available. This vulnerability exemplifies a hardware-software interaction risk, where software security assumptions are undermined by physical memory fault injection techniques. It is particularly relevant in environments such as cloud or virtualized infrastructures where multiple tenants share hardware resources. The lack of mitigation at the application level means that defenses must focus on hardware protections, system configuration, and limiting attacker co-location opportunities.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, the impact of CVE-2023-51767 depends heavily on their deployment environments. Organizations using OpenSSH in multi-tenant or virtualized settings, such as cloud service providers, hosting providers, or enterprises employing containerized or virtualized infrastructure, could be at risk if an attacker gains user-level access on the same physical host. Successful exploitation could allow attackers to bypass SSH authentication, leading to unauthorized access to critical systems, data breaches, and lateral movement within networks. This could compromise confidentiality and integrity of sensitive information and disrupt availability if attackers escalate privileges or deploy further attacks. However, the requirement for physical co-location and user privileges significantly limits the scope and ease of exploitation. Organizations relying on dedicated hardware or isolated environments face lower risk. The dispute by the supplier and absence of known exploits suggest the threat is currently theoretical but warrants attention in high-security environments. European sectors with high-value targets such as finance, government, and critical infrastructure using OpenSSH extensively should consider this vulnerability in their risk assessments.
Mitigation Recommendations
Mitigation of CVE-2023-51767 requires a multi-layered approach beyond generic advice. First, organizations should minimize attacker co-location risk by avoiding multi-tenant deployments where untrusted users share physical hardware, or by employing strong tenant isolation techniques such as hardware-enforced virtualization extensions and memory protection technologies (e.g., Intel SGX, AMD SEV). Second, enable and enforce hardware-level protections against row hammer attacks, such as using ECC (Error-Correcting Code) memory, deploying memory modules with row hammer mitigation features, or applying firmware updates that address row hammer vulnerabilities. Third, monitor and restrict user privileges rigorously to prevent attackers from gaining any user-level access on critical hosts. Fourth, consider deploying runtime integrity checks or hardened OpenSSH builds that could detect or mitigate abnormal authentication state changes, although no official patches exist yet. Finally, maintain up-to-date system firmware and hardware drivers, and follow vendor advisories for any emerging mitigations. Regular security audits and penetration testing focused on co-location and side-channel attack vectors can also help identify exposure.
Affected Countries
Germany, France, United Kingdom, Netherlands, Sweden, Finland, Belgium, Italy
CVE-2023-51767: n/a
Description
OpenSSH through 10.0, when common types of DRAM are used, might allow row hammer attacks (for authentication bypass) because the integer value of authenticated in mm_answer_authpassword does not resist flips of a single bit. NOTE: this is applicable to a certain threat model of attacker-victim co-location in which the attacker has user privileges. NOTE: this is disputed by the Supplier, who states "we do not consider it to be the application's responsibility to defend against platform architectural weaknesses."
AI-Powered Analysis
Technical Analysis
CVE-2023-51767 identifies a vulnerability in OpenSSH versions through 10.0 related to susceptibility to row hammer attacks on DRAM memory. Row hammer is a hardware-based fault injection technique where repeatedly accessing (hammering) certain rows of DRAM can induce bit flips in adjacent memory rows. In this case, the vulnerability concerns the integer value of the 'authenticated' variable in the mm_answer_authpassword function, which is used to determine if a user has successfully authenticated. Because this integer does not have protections against single-bit flips, an attacker who can induce a bit flip via row hammer could potentially alter the authentication state, effectively bypassing authentication checks. This attack requires a threat model where the attacker and victim are co-located on the same physical machine, and the attacker already has user-level privileges, which limits the attack surface. The supplier has disputed the applicability of this vulnerability, arguing that defending against hardware architectural weaknesses is outside the scope of the application. No CVSS score has been assigned, and no patches or known exploits are currently available. This vulnerability exemplifies a hardware-software interaction risk, where software security assumptions are undermined by physical memory fault injection techniques. It is particularly relevant in environments such as cloud or virtualized infrastructures where multiple tenants share hardware resources. The lack of mitigation at the application level means that defenses must focus on hardware protections, system configuration, and limiting attacker co-location opportunities.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, the impact of CVE-2023-51767 depends heavily on their deployment environments. Organizations using OpenSSH in multi-tenant or virtualized settings, such as cloud service providers, hosting providers, or enterprises employing containerized or virtualized infrastructure, could be at risk if an attacker gains user-level access on the same physical host. Successful exploitation could allow attackers to bypass SSH authentication, leading to unauthorized access to critical systems, data breaches, and lateral movement within networks. This could compromise confidentiality and integrity of sensitive information and disrupt availability if attackers escalate privileges or deploy further attacks. However, the requirement for physical co-location and user privileges significantly limits the scope and ease of exploitation. Organizations relying on dedicated hardware or isolated environments face lower risk. The dispute by the supplier and absence of known exploits suggest the threat is currently theoretical but warrants attention in high-security environments. European sectors with high-value targets such as finance, government, and critical infrastructure using OpenSSH extensively should consider this vulnerability in their risk assessments.
Mitigation Recommendations
Mitigation of CVE-2023-51767 requires a multi-layered approach beyond generic advice. First, organizations should minimize attacker co-location risk by avoiding multi-tenant deployments where untrusted users share physical hardware, or by employing strong tenant isolation techniques such as hardware-enforced virtualization extensions and memory protection technologies (e.g., Intel SGX, AMD SEV). Second, enable and enforce hardware-level protections against row hammer attacks, such as using ECC (Error-Correcting Code) memory, deploying memory modules with row hammer mitigation features, or applying firmware updates that address row hammer vulnerabilities. Third, monitor and restrict user privileges rigorously to prevent attackers from gaining any user-level access on critical hosts. Fourth, consider deploying runtime integrity checks or hardened OpenSSH builds that could detect or mitigate abnormal authentication state changes, although no official patches exist yet. Finally, maintain up-to-date system firmware and hardware drivers, and follow vendor advisories for any emerging mitigations. Regular security audits and penetration testing focused on co-location and side-channel attack vectors can also help identify exposure.
Affected Countries
For access to advanced analysis and higher rate limits, contact root@offseq.com
Technical Details
- Data Version
- 5.2
- Assigner Short Name
- mitre
- Date Reserved
- 2023-12-24T00:00:00.000Z
- Cvss Version
- null
- State
- PUBLISHED
Threat ID: 690a6f039e609817bf702c29
Added to database: 11/4/2025, 9:24:19 PM
Last enriched: 11/4/2025, 9:38:15 PM
Last updated: 11/5/2025, 8:01:24 AM
Views: 4
Community Reviews
0 reviewsCrowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.
Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.
Related Threats
CVE-2025-10622: Client-Side Enforcement of Server-Side Security in Red Hat Red Hat Satellite 6.18 for RHEL 9
HighCVE-2025-12677: CWE-200 Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor in mykiot KiotViet Sync
MediumCVE-2025-12676: CWE-259 Use of Hard-coded Password in mykiot KiotViet Sync
MediumCVE-2025-12675: CWE-862 Missing Authorization in mykiot KiotViet Sync
MediumCVE-2025-12674: CWE-434 Unrestricted Upload of File with Dangerous Type in mykiot KiotViet Sync
CriticalActions
Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.
Need enhanced features?
Contact root@offseq.com for Pro access with improved analysis and higher rate limits.