CVE-2023-6011VulnerabilityPublished 22 Nov 2023Updated 10 Jun 2025

CVE-2023-6011: DECE Software Geodi · Cross-site Scripting

Affects DECE Software GeodiSource CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 5.4 Medium : upgrade to 8.0.0.27396 when convenient.

Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 06:26 UTC

CVSS 3.1 base score

5.4Medium

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.3% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 32% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.
Patch: Available – fixed in 8.0.0.27396

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Privileges Required: Low
User Interaction: Required
Scope: Changed
Confidentiality: Low
Integrity: Low
Availability: None

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable component is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed 'remotely exploitable' and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable component.
Privileges Required: Low: The attacker is authorized with (i.e., requires) privileges that provide basic user capabilities that could normally affect only settings and files owned by a user. Alternatively, an attacker with Low privileges may have the ability to cause an impact only to non-sensitive resources.
User Interaction: Required: Successful exploitation of this vulnerability requires a user to take some action before the vulnerability can be exploited.
Scope: Changed: An exploited vulnerability can affect resources beyond the security scope managed by the security authority of the vulnerable component. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are different and managed by different security authorities.
Confidentiality: Low: There is some loss of confidentiality. Access to some restricted information is obtained, but the attacker does not have control over what information is obtained, or the amount or kind of loss is limited. The information disclosure does not cause a direct, serious loss to the impacted component.
Integrity: Low: Modification of data is possible, but the attacker does not have control over the consequence of a modification, or the amount of modification is limited. The data modification does not have a direct, serious impact on the impacted component.
Availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the impacted component.

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v3.1 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 22 Nov 2023
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 2026-10-26.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Upgrade DECE Software Geodi to 8.0.0.27396.

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
DECE Software Geodi	Affected =0 <8.0.0.27396	Fixed in 8.0.0.27396

AI-suggested

To mitigate CVE-2023-6011 effectively, European organizations should first verify if they are running affected versions of DECE Software Geodi prior to 8.0.0.27396 and plan immediate upgrades to the fixed version once available. In the absence of an official patch, organizations should implement web application firewall (WAF) rules to detect and block typical XSS payloads targeting Geodi interfaces. Input validation and output encoding should be enforced at the application layer, ensuring that all user-supplied data is properly sanitized before storage and rendering. Security teams should conduct thorough code reviews and penetration testing focused on input handling in Geodi. Additionally, user awareness training should be enhanced to reduce the risk of social engineering attacks that could trigger this vulnerability. Monitoring and logging of unusual user input or script execution attempts should be enabled to detect exploitation attempts early. Finally, organizations should isolate Geodi deployments in segmented network zones with strict access controls to limit the potential impact of any successful exploitation.

Description

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in DECE Software Geodi allows Stored XSS.This issue affects Geodi: before 8.0.0.27396.

Impact

For European organizations using DECE Software Geodi, this vulnerability poses a risk of client-side attacks that can compromise user sessions and data confidentiality. Since Geodi is a software product likely used for geospatial or data management purposes, exploitation could lead to unauthorized access to sensitive spatial or business data through hijacked sessions or stolen credentials. The scope change in the vulnerability indicates that exploitation could affect multiple components or user accounts beyond the initially compromised user, increasing the risk of lateral impact within an organization. Although the vulnerability requires some level of user interaction and privileges, the low attack complexity and network vector mean that attackers could craft phishing or social engineering campaigns to exploit it. This could be particularly impactful for organizations in sectors such as government, utilities, transportation, or urban planning in Europe, where geospatial data is critical. The lack of known exploits in the wild suggests that the threat is currently theoretical but should be addressed proactively to prevent potential targeted attacks. Failure to mitigate this vulnerability could lead to reputational damage, regulatory non-compliance (especially under GDPR if personal data is involved), and operational disruptions due to compromised user accounts.

CWE-79Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') (opens in a new tab)
Base weaknessLikelihood of exploit: HighCWE Top 25 (2025): #1OWASP Top 10 A05:2025: Injection (opens in a new tab)
The product does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes user-controllable input before it is placed in output that is used as a web page that is served to other users.
Architecture and Design · Libraries or Frameworks
Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid.
Implementation · Architecture and Design
Understand the context in which your data will be used and the encoding that will be expected. This is especially important when transmitting data between different components, or when generating outputs that can contain multiple encodings at the same time, such as web pages or multi-part mail messages.
Architecture and Design · Implementation · Attack Surface Reduction
Understand all the potential areas where untrusted inputs can enter your software: parameters or arguments, cookies, anything read from the network, environment variables, reverse DNS lookups, query results, request headers, URL components, e-mail, files, filenames, databases, and any external systems that provide…
OWASP Cheat Sheets
Cross Site Scripting Prevention (opens in a new tab)
DOM based XSS Prevention (opens in a new tab)
Injection Prevention (opens in a new tab)
Abuse Case (opens in a new tab)
Deserialization (opens in a new tab)
OWASP ASVS 4.0.3
V5.3.3 (opens in a new tab)
V1.5.1 (opens in a new tab)
Attack patterns
XSS Using MIME Type Mismatch (opens in a new tab)
DOM-Based XSS (opens in a new tab)
Reflected XSS (opens in a new tab)
Stored XSS (opens in a new tab)
Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) (opens in a new tab)
From MITRE CWE, MITRE CAPEC and OWASP (Top 10, OpenCRE).

References

usom.gov.tr/bildirim/tr-23-0650 (opens in a new tab)

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 11 Jul 2025, 02:04 UTC

WeaknessesCWE-79

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats