CVE-2023-7297: CWE-352 Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in TwitterPosts
The TwitterPosts WordPress plugin through 1.0.2 does not have CSRF check in place when updating its settings, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin change them via a CSRF attack
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
CVE-2023-7297 identifies a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the TwitterPosts WordPress plugin, affecting all versions up to 1.0.2. The vulnerability arises because the plugin does not implement CSRF tokens or other anti-CSRF mechanisms when processing requests to update its settings. This omission allows an attacker to craft a malicious web request that, if visited by an authenticated administrator, could cause unauthorized changes to the plugin's configuration. Since the attack requires the victim to be logged in with administrative privileges and to perform an action involving user interaction (such as clicking a link), the attack vector is limited but still feasible. The CVSS 3.1 base score is 3.5 (low), reflecting the need for privileges and user interaction, and the limited impact on confidentiality and integrity. The vulnerability does not affect availability. No public exploits or active exploitation have been reported, indicating a low immediate risk. However, the vulnerability could be leveraged as part of a broader attack chain to manipulate site behavior or gain further foothold. The lack of vendor information and patch links suggests that users should monitor for updates or consider alternative mitigations. The vulnerability is categorized under CWE-352, a common web application security weakness related to CSRF.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, the impact of CVE-2023-7297 is primarily on the integrity and confidentiality of WordPress site configurations where the TwitterPosts plugin is installed. Unauthorized changes to plugin settings could lead to altered site behavior, potential leakage of sensitive information, or the enabling of further malicious activities. While the direct impact is low, compromised administrative settings can undermine trust in web assets and potentially facilitate more severe attacks if combined with other vulnerabilities. Organizations with public-facing WordPress sites, especially those handling sensitive user data or critical business functions, may face reputational damage or compliance issues if exploited. The requirement for administrative privileges and user interaction limits the scope but does not eliminate risk, particularly in environments with many administrators or less stringent access controls. Given the widespread use of WordPress across Europe, even a low-severity vulnerability can have a broad impact if left unaddressed.
Mitigation Recommendations
1. Monitor for official patches or updates to the TwitterPosts plugin and apply them promptly once available. 2. Until patches are released, restrict administrative access to trusted personnel only and enforce strong authentication mechanisms such as multi-factor authentication (MFA). 3. Implement Web Application Firewalls (WAFs) with rules to detect and block CSRF attack patterns targeting WordPress admin endpoints. 4. Educate administrators about the risks of clicking untrusted links while logged into administrative accounts to reduce the likelihood of user interaction exploitation. 5. Consider disabling or removing the TwitterPosts plugin if it is not essential to reduce the attack surface. 6. Regularly audit WordPress plugins and configurations for security best practices and ensure that all plugins are from reputable sources with active maintenance. 7. Use security plugins that add CSRF protections or enhance WordPress security posture. 8. Monitor logs for unusual administrative activity that could indicate exploitation attempts.
Affected Countries
Germany, France, United Kingdom, Netherlands, Italy, Spain, Poland
CVE-2023-7297: CWE-352 Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in TwitterPosts
Description
The TwitterPosts WordPress plugin through 1.0.2 does not have CSRF check in place when updating its settings, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin change them via a CSRF attack
AI-Powered Analysis
Technical Analysis
CVE-2023-7297 identifies a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the TwitterPosts WordPress plugin, affecting all versions up to 1.0.2. The vulnerability arises because the plugin does not implement CSRF tokens or other anti-CSRF mechanisms when processing requests to update its settings. This omission allows an attacker to craft a malicious web request that, if visited by an authenticated administrator, could cause unauthorized changes to the plugin's configuration. Since the attack requires the victim to be logged in with administrative privileges and to perform an action involving user interaction (such as clicking a link), the attack vector is limited but still feasible. The CVSS 3.1 base score is 3.5 (low), reflecting the need for privileges and user interaction, and the limited impact on confidentiality and integrity. The vulnerability does not affect availability. No public exploits or active exploitation have been reported, indicating a low immediate risk. However, the vulnerability could be leveraged as part of a broader attack chain to manipulate site behavior or gain further foothold. The lack of vendor information and patch links suggests that users should monitor for updates or consider alternative mitigations. The vulnerability is categorized under CWE-352, a common web application security weakness related to CSRF.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, the impact of CVE-2023-7297 is primarily on the integrity and confidentiality of WordPress site configurations where the TwitterPosts plugin is installed. Unauthorized changes to plugin settings could lead to altered site behavior, potential leakage of sensitive information, or the enabling of further malicious activities. While the direct impact is low, compromised administrative settings can undermine trust in web assets and potentially facilitate more severe attacks if combined with other vulnerabilities. Organizations with public-facing WordPress sites, especially those handling sensitive user data or critical business functions, may face reputational damage or compliance issues if exploited. The requirement for administrative privileges and user interaction limits the scope but does not eliminate risk, particularly in environments with many administrators or less stringent access controls. Given the widespread use of WordPress across Europe, even a low-severity vulnerability can have a broad impact if left unaddressed.
Mitigation Recommendations
1. Monitor for official patches or updates to the TwitterPosts plugin and apply them promptly once available. 2. Until patches are released, restrict administrative access to trusted personnel only and enforce strong authentication mechanisms such as multi-factor authentication (MFA). 3. Implement Web Application Firewalls (WAFs) with rules to detect and block CSRF attack patterns targeting WordPress admin endpoints. 4. Educate administrators about the risks of clicking untrusted links while logged into administrative accounts to reduce the likelihood of user interaction exploitation. 5. Consider disabling or removing the TwitterPosts plugin if it is not essential to reduce the attack surface. 6. Regularly audit WordPress plugins and configurations for security best practices and ensure that all plugins are from reputable sources with active maintenance. 7. Use security plugins that add CSRF protections or enhance WordPress security posture. 8. Monitor logs for unusual administrative activity that could indicate exploitation attempts.
Affected Countries
For access to advanced analysis and higher rate limits, contact root@offseq.com
Technical Details
- Data Version
- 5.1
- Assigner Short Name
- WPScan
- Date Reserved
- 2024-11-01T12:34:05.765Z
- Cisa Enriched
- true
- Cvss Version
- 3.1
- State
- PUBLISHED
Threat ID: 682cd0f91484d88663aebccb
Added to database: 5/20/2025, 6:59:05 PM
Last enriched: 11/13/2025, 9:27:37 PM
Last updated: 11/22/2025, 6:05:36 AM
Views: 31
Community Reviews
0 reviewsCrowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.
Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.
Related Threats
CVE-2025-11186: CWE-79 Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') in humanityco Cookie Notice & Compliance for GDPR / CCPA
MediumCVE-2025-2609: CWE-79 Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation (XSS or 'Cross-site Scripting') in MagnusSolution MagnusBilling
HighCVE-2024-9643: CWE-489 Active Debug Code in Four-Faith F3x36
CriticalCVE-2025-65947: CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption in jzeuzs thread-amount
HighCVE-2025-65946: CWE-77: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in a Command ('Command Injection') in RooCodeInc Roo-Code
HighActions
Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.
External Links
Need enhanced features?
Contact root@offseq.com for Pro access with improved analysis and higher rate limits.