VulnerabilityPublished 29 Jan 2024Updated 29 May 2025

CVE-2024-0989: Sichuan Yougou Technology KuERP · Path Traversal: '../filedir

Affects Sichuan Yougou Technology KuERPSource CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 5.4 Medium.

Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 14:05 UTC

CVSS 3.1 base score

5.4Medium

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 1.1% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 67% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L

Attack Vector: Adjacent
Attack Complexity: Low
Privileges Required: None
User Interaction: None
Scope: Unchanged
Confidentiality: None
Integrity: Low
Availability: Low

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Adjacent: The vulnerable component is bound to the network stack, but the attack is limited at the protocol level to a logically adjacent topology. This can mean an attack must be launched from the same shared physical (e.g., Bluetooth or IEEE 802.11) or logical (e.g., local IP subnet) network, or from within a secure or otherwise limited administrative domain (e.g., MPLS, secure VPN to an administrative network zone).
Attack Complexity: Low: Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable component.
Privileges Required: None: The attacker is unauthorized prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files to carry out an attack.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without any interaction from any user.
Scope: Unchanged: An exploited vulnerability can only affect resources managed by the same security authority. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are either the same, or both are managed by the same security authority.
Confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the impacted component.
Integrity: Low: Modification of data is possible, but the attacker does not have control over the consequence of a modification, or the amount of modification is limited. The data modification does not have a direct, serious impact on the impacted component.
Availability: Low: Performance is reduced or there are interruptions in resource availability. Even if repeated exploitation of the vulnerability is possible, the attacker does not have the ability to completely deny service to legitimate users. The resources in the impacted component are either partially available all of the time, or fully available only some of the time, but overall there is no direct, serious consequence to the impacted component.

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v3.1 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 29 Jan 2024
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 26 Oct 2026.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC or the CVSS exploit maturity reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
Sichuan Yougou Technology KuERP	Affected 1.0.0 – 1.0.4 5 affected builds	Fixed in–

AI-suggested

Immediate mitigation should include restricting network access to the KuERP application to trusted hosts only, ideally isolating it within a secure network segment to prevent adjacent network attackers.
Implement strict input validation and sanitization on the 'file' parameter at the application level to prevent path traversal sequences such as '../'.
Employ web application firewalls (WAFs) with custom rules to detect and block path traversal attempts targeting the del_sn_db function or related endpoints.
Regularly monitor application logs for suspicious file path manipulation attempts.
If possible, disable or restrict the del_sn_db function until a vendor patch is available.
Maintain offline backups of critical ERP data to enable recovery in case of file deletion or corruption.
Engage with the vendor or community to track patch releases or unofficial fixes.
Conduct penetration testing focused on path traversal to identify other potential vulnerable endpoints. These steps go beyond generic advice by focusing on network segmentation, application-level filtering, and proactive monitoring tailored to this specific vulnerability and product.

Description

A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, has been found in Sichuan Yougou Technology KuERP up to 1.0.4. Affected by this issue is the function del_sn_db of the file /application/index/controller/Service.php. The manipulation of the argument file leads to path traversal: '../filedir'. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. VDB-252254 is the identifier assigned to this vulnerability. NOTE: The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Impact

For European organizations using KuERP, this vulnerability poses a risk to the integrity and availability of their ERP system data. Exploitation could allow attackers to delete or alter files critical to business operations, leading to operational downtime, financial losses, and potential regulatory compliance issues, especially under GDPR if data integrity is compromised. Since KuERP is an enterprise resource planning system, disruption could affect supply chain management, financial reporting, and other core business functions. The medium CVSS score reflects moderate risk, but the lack of vendor response and patches increases exposure. Organizations with KuERP installations accessible over local or adjacent networks are particularly vulnerable. Given the potential for file deletion or modification, attackers could also use this as a foothold to escalate attacks or disrupt services. The absence of confidentiality impact reduces risk of data leakage, but integrity and availability impacts remain significant for business continuity.

CWE-24Path Traversal: '../filedir' (opens in a new tab)
Variant weakness
The product uses external input to construct a pathname that should be within a restricted directory, but it does not properly neutralize "../" sequences that can resolve to a location that is outside of that directory.
Implementation · Input Validation
Assume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does.
Implementation · Input Validation
Inputs should be decoded and canonicalized to the application's current internal representation before being validated (CWE-180). Make sure that the application does not decode the same input twice (CWE-174).
OWASP ASVS 4.0.3
V12.3.1 (opens in a new tab)
From MITRE CWE, MITRE CAPEC and OWASP (Top 10, OpenCRE).

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 7 Jul 2025, 23:43 UTC

WeaknessesCWE-24

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats