Skip to main content
Press slash or control plus K to focus the search. Use the arrow keys to navigate results and press enter to open a threat.
Reconnecting to live updates…

CVE-2024-10252: CWE-94 Improper Control of Generation of Code in langgenius langgenius/dify

0
High
VulnerabilityCVE-2024-10252cvecve-2024-10252cwe-94
Published: Thu Mar 20 2025 (03/20/2025, 10:10:41 UTC)
Source: CVE Database V5
Vendor/Project: langgenius
Product: langgenius/dify

Description

A vulnerability in langgenius/dify versions <=v0.9.1 allows for code injection via internal SSRF requests in the Dify sandbox service. This vulnerability enables an attacker to execute arbitrary Python code with root privileges within the sandbox environment, potentially leading to the deletion of the entire sandbox service and causing irreversible damage.

AI-Powered Analysis

AILast updated: 10/15/2025, 13:12:08 UTC

Technical Analysis

CVE-2024-10252 is a critical vulnerability identified in the langgenius/dify product, specifically affecting versions up to 0.9.1. The root cause is improper control of code generation (CWE-94), which manifests as a code injection vulnerability via internal Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) requests within the Dify sandbox service. This sandbox is designed to execute Python code in an isolated environment; however, due to insufficient validation and control over the code generation process, an attacker can craft SSRF requests that inject arbitrary Python code. The injected code executes with root privileges inside the sandbox, which significantly escalates the potential damage. The attacker can delete the entire sandbox service, leading to irreversible damage and service disruption. The CVSS 3.0 score of 8.8 reflects the high impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability, combined with low attack complexity and no requirement for user interaction. Although exploitation requires some level of privileges (PR:L), the vulnerability is remotely exploitable (AV:N), increasing the attack surface. No patches or exploit code are currently publicly available, but the risk remains high due to the severity and ease of exploitation once an attacker gains access. The vulnerability highlights the dangers of inadequate input validation and sandbox isolation in environments executing dynamic code.

Potential Impact

For European organizations, the impact of CVE-2024-10252 is significant, especially for those leveraging langgenius/dify in AI development, automation, or sandboxed code execution environments. Successful exploitation can lead to full compromise of the sandbox environment, allowing attackers to execute arbitrary code with root privileges, potentially leading to data breaches, destruction of critical services, and operational downtime. The deletion of the sandbox service could disrupt development pipelines, AI model training, or any dependent services, causing financial loss and reputational damage. Organizations in sectors such as finance, healthcare, and critical infrastructure that rely on AI or sandboxed code execution are particularly vulnerable. The high severity and root-level code execution elevate the risk of lateral movement within networks, further endangering sensitive European data and systems. Additionally, the lack of known exploits in the wild does not diminish the urgency, as attackers may develop exploits rapidly once the vulnerability is publicly disclosed.

Mitigation Recommendations

To mitigate CVE-2024-10252, European organizations should: 1) Immediately upgrade langgenius/dify to a patched version once available; in the absence of patches, consider disabling or isolating the Dify sandbox service. 2) Implement strict network segmentation and firewall rules to prevent unauthorized internal SSRF requests, limiting the sandbox’s ability to make outbound or internal network calls. 3) Harden the sandbox environment by enforcing least privilege principles, ensuring the sandbox runs with minimal permissions and cannot escalate to root. 4) Employ runtime application self-protection (RASP) or intrusion detection systems to monitor and block suspicious SSRF or code injection attempts. 5) Conduct thorough code reviews and penetration testing focused on SSRF and code injection vectors within the sandbox. 6) Monitor logs for unusual activity related to the sandbox service, such as unexpected Python code execution or deletion attempts. 7) Educate developers and security teams about the risks of improper code generation and sandbox escape techniques to prevent similar vulnerabilities in future development.

Need more detailed analysis?Get Pro

Technical Details

Data Version
5.1
Assigner Short Name
@huntr_ai
Date Reserved
2024-10-22T16:40:04.945Z
Cvss Version
3.0
State
PUBLISHED

Threat ID: 68ef9b21178f764e1f4709b5

Added to database: 10/15/2025, 1:01:21 PM

Last enriched: 10/15/2025, 1:12:08 PM

Last updated: 10/16/2025, 12:39:03 PM

Views: 1

Community Reviews

0 reviews

Crowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.

Sort by
Loading community insights…

Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.

Actions

PRO

Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.

Please log in to the Console to use AI analysis features.

Need enhanced features?

Contact root@offseq.com for Pro access with improved analysis and higher rate limits.

Latest Threats