VulnerabilityPublished 29 Oct 2024Updated 3 Nov 2025

CVE-2024-10464: Mozilla Firefox · Out-of-bounds Read

Affects Mozilla FirefoxSource CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 7.5 High : upgrade to 132 or 128.4 soon.

Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 14:05 UTC

CVSS 3.1 base score

7.5High

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.6% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 50% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.
Patch: Available – fixed in 132, 128.4

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Privileges Required: None
User Interaction: None
Scope: Unchanged
Confidentiality: None
Integrity: None
Availability: High

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable component is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed 'remotely exploitable' and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable component.
Privileges Required: None: The attacker is unauthorized prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files to carry out an attack.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without any interaction from any user.
Scope: Unchanged: An exploited vulnerability can only affect resources managed by the same security authority. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are either the same, or both are managed by the same security authority.
Confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the impacted component.
Integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the impacted component.
Availability: High: There is total loss of availability, resulting in the attacker being able to fully deny access to resources in the impacted component; this loss is either sustained (while the attacker continues to deliver the attack) or persistent (the condition persists even after the attack has completed). Alternatively, the attacker has the ability to deny some availability, but the loss of availability presents a direct, serious consequence to the impacted component (e.g., the attacker cannot disrupt existing connections, but can prevent new connections; the attacker can repeatedly exploit a vulnerability that, in each instance of a successful attack, leaks a only small amount of memory, but after repeated exploitation causes a service to become completely unavailable).

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v3.1 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 29 Oct 2024
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 26 Oct 2026.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC or the CVSS exploit maturity reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Upgrade Mozilla Firefox to 132 or 128.4.

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
Mozilla Firefox	Affected <132 <128.4	Fixed in 132 128.4

AI-suggested

European organizations should prioritize updating Mozilla Firefox to version 132 or later and Thunderbird to version 128.4 or later to ensure the vulnerability is patched. Network administrators should monitor browser and email client logs for unusual spikes in history API usage or resource consumption that could indicate attempted exploitation. Implementing web filtering to block access to suspicious or untrusted websites can reduce exposure to malicious pages designed to trigger this DoS. Security teams should educate users about the importance of applying updates promptly and consider deploying browser hardening configurations that limit script execution on untrusted sites. For managed environments, automated patch management systems should be used to enforce timely updates. Additionally, organizations can deploy endpoint detection and response (EDR) tools to identify abnormal application behavior consistent with resource exhaustion attacks. Regular backups and incident response plans should be reviewed to ensure rapid recovery from potential service disruptions. Finally, collaboration with Mozilla’s security advisories and threat intelligence feeds will help maintain awareness of any emerging exploit activity.

Description

Repeated writes to history interface attributes could have been used to cause a Denial of Service condition in the browser. This was addressed by introducing rate-limiting to this API. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 132, Firefox ESR < 128.4, Thunderbird < 128.4, and Thunderbird < 132.

Impact

For European organizations, this vulnerability can lead to significant operational disruptions. Firefox and Thunderbird are widely used across Europe for web browsing and email communication, including in government, financial, healthcare, and critical infrastructure sectors. A successful DoS attack could render browsers or email clients unresponsive, impacting employee productivity and potentially delaying critical communications. In sectors where browser availability is essential for accessing cloud services or web-based applications, this could translate into broader business continuity issues. Although the vulnerability does not compromise confidentiality or integrity, the loss of availability can cause cascading effects, especially in environments with strict uptime requirements. Additionally, the ease of exploitation without authentication or user interaction increases the risk of automated or large-scale attacks targeting European networks. Organizations with remote or hybrid workforces relying on these applications are particularly vulnerable to disruption. The absence of known exploits currently reduces immediate risk but does not eliminate the potential for future attacks.

CWE-125Out-of-bounds Read (opens in a new tab)
Base weaknessCWE Top 25 (2025): #8
The product reads data past the end, or before the beginning, of the intended buffer.
Implementation · Input Validation
Assume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does.
Architecture and Design · Language Selection
Use a language that provides appropriate memory abstractions.
OWASP Cheat Sheets
XML Security (opens in a new tab)
Mass Assignment (opens in a new tab)
OWASP ASVS 4.0.3
V13.3.1 (opens in a new tab)
V5.1.4 (opens in a new tab)
V5.1.3 (opens in a new tab)
Attack patterns
Overread Buffers (opens in a new tab)
From MITRE CWE, MITRE CAPEC and OWASP (Top 10, OpenCRE).

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 3 Nov 2025, 23:14 UTC

WeaknessesCWE-125

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats