CVE-2024-1132: Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal')
A flaw was found in Keycloak, where it does not properly validate URLs included in a redirect. This issue could allow an attacker to construct a malicious request to bypass validation and access other URLs and sensitive information within the domain or conduct further attacks. This flaw affects any client that utilizes a wildcard in the Valid Redirect URIs field, and requires user interaction within the malicious URL.
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
CVE-2024-1132 is a path traversal vulnerability classified under CWE-22, affecting Keycloak versions 21.1.0 and 23.0.0. The vulnerability stems from Keycloak's failure to properly validate URLs included in redirect requests. Specifically, when a client application configures its Valid Redirect URIs field with wildcards, Keycloak does not sufficiently restrict or sanitize the redirect URLs. This allows an attacker to craft a malicious URL that bypasses the intended validation logic, enabling redirection to unauthorized internal URLs or resources within the domain. Such behavior can lead to unauthorized access to sensitive information or facilitate further attacks such as phishing or session hijacking. Exploitation requires the victim to interact with the malicious URL, but no authentication or elevated privileges are necessary. The vulnerability has a CVSS 3.1 base score of 8.1, reflecting its high severity due to ease of exploitation over the network, lack of required privileges, and significant impact on confidentiality and integrity. Although no public exploits are currently known, the widespread use of Keycloak as an open-source identity and access management solution in enterprises and cloud environments increases the risk of exploitation once a proof-of-concept becomes available. The issue highlights the risks of using wildcard entries in redirect URI configurations, which can inadvertently expand the attack surface.
Potential Impact
The vulnerability poses a significant risk to organizations using Keycloak for identity and access management, especially those employing wildcard entries in their Valid Redirect URIs. Successful exploitation can lead to unauthorized access to sensitive internal URLs and data, compromising confidentiality and integrity of user sessions and information. Attackers could leverage this to conduct phishing attacks, steal session tokens, or perform further lateral movement within the affected domain. While availability is not directly impacted, the breach of sensitive information could lead to reputational damage, regulatory penalties, and financial losses. Organizations with large user bases or those operating in regulated industries face heightened risks. The requirement for user interaction limits automated exploitation but does not eliminate the threat, as social engineering can be used to lure victims. Given Keycloak's popularity in cloud-native and enterprise environments globally, the potential impact is broad and severe if mitigations are not applied promptly.
Mitigation Recommendations
Organizations should immediately audit their Keycloak configurations to identify any clients using wildcard entries in the Valid Redirect URIs field and replace them with explicit, narrowly scoped URIs. Avoid using wildcards to minimize the attack surface. Monitor and restrict redirect URIs to trusted domains only. Implement strict URL validation and sanitization on the client side where possible. Educate users about the risks of interacting with suspicious URLs to reduce successful phishing attempts. Stay alert for official patches or updates from Keycloak and apply them promptly once released. In the interim, consider deploying web application firewalls (WAFs) with rules to detect and block suspicious redirect requests. Conduct penetration testing focused on redirect URI validation to identify potential bypasses. Additionally, implement multi-factor authentication (MFA) to reduce the impact of compromised sessions. Logging and monitoring redirect activities can help detect exploitation attempts early.
Affected Countries
United States, Germany, United Kingdom, France, India, Japan, Canada, Australia, Netherlands, Brazil
CVE-2024-1132: Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal')
Description
A flaw was found in Keycloak, where it does not properly validate URLs included in a redirect. This issue could allow an attacker to construct a malicious request to bypass validation and access other URLs and sensitive information within the domain or conduct further attacks. This flaw affects any client that utilizes a wildcard in the Valid Redirect URIs field, and requires user interaction within the malicious URL.
AI-Powered Analysis
Machine-generated threat intelligence
Technical Analysis
CVE-2024-1132 is a path traversal vulnerability classified under CWE-22, affecting Keycloak versions 21.1.0 and 23.0.0. The vulnerability stems from Keycloak's failure to properly validate URLs included in redirect requests. Specifically, when a client application configures its Valid Redirect URIs field with wildcards, Keycloak does not sufficiently restrict or sanitize the redirect URLs. This allows an attacker to craft a malicious URL that bypasses the intended validation logic, enabling redirection to unauthorized internal URLs or resources within the domain. Such behavior can lead to unauthorized access to sensitive information or facilitate further attacks such as phishing or session hijacking. Exploitation requires the victim to interact with the malicious URL, but no authentication or elevated privileges are necessary. The vulnerability has a CVSS 3.1 base score of 8.1, reflecting its high severity due to ease of exploitation over the network, lack of required privileges, and significant impact on confidentiality and integrity. Although no public exploits are currently known, the widespread use of Keycloak as an open-source identity and access management solution in enterprises and cloud environments increases the risk of exploitation once a proof-of-concept becomes available. The issue highlights the risks of using wildcard entries in redirect URI configurations, which can inadvertently expand the attack surface.
Potential Impact
The vulnerability poses a significant risk to organizations using Keycloak for identity and access management, especially those employing wildcard entries in their Valid Redirect URIs. Successful exploitation can lead to unauthorized access to sensitive internal URLs and data, compromising confidentiality and integrity of user sessions and information. Attackers could leverage this to conduct phishing attacks, steal session tokens, or perform further lateral movement within the affected domain. While availability is not directly impacted, the breach of sensitive information could lead to reputational damage, regulatory penalties, and financial losses. Organizations with large user bases or those operating in regulated industries face heightened risks. The requirement for user interaction limits automated exploitation but does not eliminate the threat, as social engineering can be used to lure victims. Given Keycloak's popularity in cloud-native and enterprise environments globally, the potential impact is broad and severe if mitigations are not applied promptly.
Mitigation Recommendations
Organizations should immediately audit their Keycloak configurations to identify any clients using wildcard entries in the Valid Redirect URIs field and replace them with explicit, narrowly scoped URIs. Avoid using wildcards to minimize the attack surface. Monitor and restrict redirect URIs to trusted domains only. Implement strict URL validation and sanitization on the client side where possible. Educate users about the risks of interacting with suspicious URLs to reduce successful phishing attempts. Stay alert for official patches or updates from Keycloak and apply them promptly once released. In the interim, consider deploying web application firewalls (WAFs) with rules to detect and block suspicious redirect requests. Conduct penetration testing focused on redirect URI validation to identify potential bypasses. Additionally, implement multi-factor authentication (MFA) to reduce the impact of compromised sessions. Logging and monitoring redirect activities can help detect exploitation attempts early.
Technical Details
- Data Version
- 5.2
- Assigner Short Name
- redhat
- Date Reserved
- 2024-01-31T17:07:33.455Z
- Cvss Version
- 3.1
- State
- PUBLISHED
Threat ID: 690dcba503ca312466af76ad
Added to database: 11/7/2025, 10:36:21 AM
Last enriched: 3/18/2026, 6:29:56 PM
Last updated: 3/26/2026, 11:07:42 AM
Views: 218
Community Reviews
0 reviewsCrowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.
Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.
Actions
Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.
Need more coverage?
Upgrade to Pro Console for AI refresh and higher limits.
For incident response and remediation, OffSeq services can help resolve threats faster.
Latest Threats
Check if your credentials are on the dark web
Instant breach scanning across billions of leaked records. Free tier available.