CVE-2024-12084: Heap-based Buffer Overflow
A heap-based buffer overflow flaw was found in the rsync daemon. This issue is due to improper handling of attacker-controlled checksum lengths (s2length) in the code. When MAX_DIGEST_LEN exceeds the fixed SUM_LENGTH (16 bytes), an attacker can write out of bounds in the sum2 buffer.
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
CVE-2024-12084 is a heap-based buffer overflow vulnerability identified in the rsync daemon, specifically affecting versions 3.2.7 and 3.3.0. The root cause is improper handling of the checksum length parameter (s2length), which is attacker-controlled. Rsync uses checksums to verify file integrity during synchronization. The vulnerability occurs when the constant MAX_DIGEST_LEN exceeds the fixed SUM_LENGTH of 16 bytes, allowing an attacker to write beyond the allocated bounds of the sum2 buffer on the heap. This out-of-bounds write can corrupt memory, potentially enabling remote code execution or denial of service. The flaw is exploitable remotely without requiring authentication or user interaction, making it highly dangerous. The CVSS v3.1 score of 9.8 reflects its critical nature, with attack vector network (AV:N), low attack complexity (AC:L), no privileges required (PR:N), no user interaction (UI:N), and full impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability (C:H/I:H/A:H). Rsync is widely used for file synchronization and backup in many enterprise and cloud environments, increasing the potential attack surface. Although no exploits are currently known in the wild, the vulnerability’s characteristics suggest that exploitation could lead to full system compromise. The issue was reserved in December 2024 and published in January 2025, with patches expected to be released by vendors. Until patches are applied, systems remain at high risk.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, the impact of CVE-2024-12084 is significant due to the widespread deployment of rsync in IT infrastructure, including backup servers, file synchronization services, and cloud environments. Exploitation could allow attackers to execute arbitrary code remotely, leading to data breaches, ransomware deployment, or complete system takeover. Confidentiality is at risk as attackers could access sensitive files during synchronization. Integrity is compromised as attackers might alter files or inject malicious payloads. Availability could be disrupted through denial-of-service conditions caused by memory corruption. Given the critical severity and remote exploitability without authentication, this vulnerability poses a severe threat to critical infrastructure, financial institutions, healthcare providers, and government agencies across Europe. The potential for lateral movement within networks further exacerbates the risk, making timely mitigation essential to prevent widespread damage.
Mitigation Recommendations
1. Immediately identify and inventory all systems running vulnerable rsync versions (3.2.7 and 3.3.0). 2. Apply vendor patches or upgrade to fixed versions as soon as they become available. 3. If patches are not yet available, consider disabling the rsync daemon or restricting its network exposure using firewall rules to limit access to trusted IP addresses only. 4. Employ network intrusion detection/prevention systems (IDS/IPS) to monitor and block suspicious rsync traffic patterns indicative of exploitation attempts. 5. Use application-layer firewalls or proxies to inspect and validate rsync checksum lengths and other protocol parameters. 6. Conduct thorough logging and monitoring of rsync activity to detect anomalies or unexpected behavior. 7. Implement strict access controls and network segmentation to limit the impact of a potential compromise. 8. Educate system administrators about the vulnerability and encourage rapid response to security advisories. 9. Regularly review and update incident response plans to include scenarios involving rsync exploitation. 10. Consider deploying runtime application self-protection (RASP) or memory protection mechanisms to mitigate heap overflow exploitation.
Affected Countries
Germany, France, United Kingdom, Netherlands, Italy, Spain, Sweden, Poland
CVE-2024-12084: Heap-based Buffer Overflow
Description
A heap-based buffer overflow flaw was found in the rsync daemon. This issue is due to improper handling of attacker-controlled checksum lengths (s2length) in the code. When MAX_DIGEST_LEN exceeds the fixed SUM_LENGTH (16 bytes), an attacker can write out of bounds in the sum2 buffer.
AI-Powered Analysis
Technical Analysis
CVE-2024-12084 is a heap-based buffer overflow vulnerability identified in the rsync daemon, specifically affecting versions 3.2.7 and 3.3.0. The root cause is improper handling of the checksum length parameter (s2length), which is attacker-controlled. Rsync uses checksums to verify file integrity during synchronization. The vulnerability occurs when the constant MAX_DIGEST_LEN exceeds the fixed SUM_LENGTH of 16 bytes, allowing an attacker to write beyond the allocated bounds of the sum2 buffer on the heap. This out-of-bounds write can corrupt memory, potentially enabling remote code execution or denial of service. The flaw is exploitable remotely without requiring authentication or user interaction, making it highly dangerous. The CVSS v3.1 score of 9.8 reflects its critical nature, with attack vector network (AV:N), low attack complexity (AC:L), no privileges required (PR:N), no user interaction (UI:N), and full impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability (C:H/I:H/A:H). Rsync is widely used for file synchronization and backup in many enterprise and cloud environments, increasing the potential attack surface. Although no exploits are currently known in the wild, the vulnerability’s characteristics suggest that exploitation could lead to full system compromise. The issue was reserved in December 2024 and published in January 2025, with patches expected to be released by vendors. Until patches are applied, systems remain at high risk.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, the impact of CVE-2024-12084 is significant due to the widespread deployment of rsync in IT infrastructure, including backup servers, file synchronization services, and cloud environments. Exploitation could allow attackers to execute arbitrary code remotely, leading to data breaches, ransomware deployment, or complete system takeover. Confidentiality is at risk as attackers could access sensitive files during synchronization. Integrity is compromised as attackers might alter files or inject malicious payloads. Availability could be disrupted through denial-of-service conditions caused by memory corruption. Given the critical severity and remote exploitability without authentication, this vulnerability poses a severe threat to critical infrastructure, financial institutions, healthcare providers, and government agencies across Europe. The potential for lateral movement within networks further exacerbates the risk, making timely mitigation essential to prevent widespread damage.
Mitigation Recommendations
1. Immediately identify and inventory all systems running vulnerable rsync versions (3.2.7 and 3.3.0). 2. Apply vendor patches or upgrade to fixed versions as soon as they become available. 3. If patches are not yet available, consider disabling the rsync daemon or restricting its network exposure using firewall rules to limit access to trusted IP addresses only. 4. Employ network intrusion detection/prevention systems (IDS/IPS) to monitor and block suspicious rsync traffic patterns indicative of exploitation attempts. 5. Use application-layer firewalls or proxies to inspect and validate rsync checksum lengths and other protocol parameters. 6. Conduct thorough logging and monitoring of rsync activity to detect anomalies or unexpected behavior. 7. Implement strict access controls and network segmentation to limit the impact of a potential compromise. 8. Educate system administrators about the vulnerability and encourage rapid response to security advisories. 9. Regularly review and update incident response plans to include scenarios involving rsync exploitation. 10. Consider deploying runtime application self-protection (RASP) or memory protection mechanisms to mitigate heap overflow exploitation.
Affected Countries
Technical Details
- Data Version
- 5.1
- Assigner Short Name
- redhat
- Date Reserved
- 2024-12-03T08:57:42.580Z
- Cisa Enriched
- true
- Cvss Version
- 3.1
- State
- PUBLISHED
Threat ID: 682f0c680acd01a249259513
Added to database: 5/22/2025, 11:37:12 AM
Last enriched: 2/4/2026, 8:22:20 AM
Last updated: 2/7/2026, 7:54:57 AM
Views: 42
Community Reviews
0 reviewsCrowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.
Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.
Related Threats
CVE-2026-2077: Improper Authorization in yeqifu warehouse
MediumCVE-2026-2076: Improper Authorization in yeqifu warehouse
MediumCVE-2025-15491: CWE-22 Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal') in Post Slides
HighCVE-2025-15267: CWE-79 Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') in boldthemes Bold Page Builder
MediumCVE-2025-13463: CWE-79 Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') in boldthemes Bold Page Builder
MediumActions
Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.
Need more coverage?
Upgrade to Pro Console in Console -> Billing for AI refresh and higher limits.
For incident response and remediation, OffSeq services can help resolve threats faster.