CVE-2024-12084: Heap-based Buffer Overflow
A heap-based buffer overflow flaw was found in the rsync daemon. This issue is due to improper handling of attacker-controlled checksum lengths (s2length) in the code. When MAX_DIGEST_LEN exceeds the fixed SUM_LENGTH (16 bytes), an attacker can write out of bounds in the sum2 buffer.
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
CVE-2024-12084 is a critical heap-based buffer overflow vulnerability identified in the rsync daemon, specifically affecting versions 3.2.7 and 3.3.0. The root cause lies in improper handling of attacker-controlled checksum lengths, referred to as s2length, within the rsync protocol implementation. Rsync uses checksums to verify data integrity during synchronization. The vulnerability arises when the constant MAX_DIGEST_LEN exceeds the fixed SUM_LENGTH of 16 bytes, allowing an attacker to write beyond the allocated bounds of the sum2 buffer. This out-of-bounds write can corrupt heap memory, potentially enabling remote code execution, denial of service, or other arbitrary code manipulation without requiring any authentication or user interaction. The CVSS v3.1 base score of 9.8 reflects the high severity, with an attack vector of network (AV:N), low attack complexity (AC:L), no privileges required (PR:N), no user interaction (UI:N), and full impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability (C:H/I:H/A:H). Although no known exploits are currently reported in the wild, the ease of exploitation and critical impact make this a significant threat to any environment running vulnerable rsync daemon versions. Rsync is widely used for file synchronization and backup across many Linux and Unix-based systems, often exposed on network services, increasing the risk surface for remote exploitation.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, this vulnerability poses a severe risk, especially for enterprises relying on rsync for backup, file replication, or system synchronization services. Successful exploitation could lead to full system compromise, data breaches, or disruption of critical services. Sectors such as finance, healthcare, government, and critical infrastructure that depend on secure and reliable data transfer could face operational outages and data integrity loss. The lack of authentication requirement means attackers can exploit this remotely without prior access, increasing the threat level. Additionally, organizations with rsync daemons exposed to the internet or within less-secured internal networks are particularly vulnerable. The potential for remote code execution could allow attackers to establish persistent footholds, move laterally, or exfiltrate sensitive data, impacting confidentiality and compliance with European data protection regulations such as GDPR.
Mitigation Recommendations
Immediate mitigation involves upgrading rsync to a patched version once available from trusted sources or vendors. Until patches are released, organizations should restrict network exposure of rsync daemons by implementing strict firewall rules to limit access only to trusted hosts and networks. Employ network segmentation to isolate backup and synchronization services. Monitoring network traffic for unusual rsync activity and enabling intrusion detection systems with signatures targeting anomalous checksum length usage can provide early warning. Additionally, consider disabling rsync daemons on systems where it is not essential. For critical systems, deploying application-layer proxies or VPNs to control and encrypt rsync traffic can reduce attack surface. Regularly auditing and hardening configurations, including limiting user permissions for rsync processes, will further reduce risk. Organizations should also prepare incident response plans to quickly address potential exploitation attempts.
Affected Countries
Germany, France, United Kingdom, Netherlands, Italy, Spain, Poland, Sweden, Belgium, Switzerland
CVE-2024-12084: Heap-based Buffer Overflow
Description
A heap-based buffer overflow flaw was found in the rsync daemon. This issue is due to improper handling of attacker-controlled checksum lengths (s2length) in the code. When MAX_DIGEST_LEN exceeds the fixed SUM_LENGTH (16 bytes), an attacker can write out of bounds in the sum2 buffer.
AI-Powered Analysis
Technical Analysis
CVE-2024-12084 is a critical heap-based buffer overflow vulnerability identified in the rsync daemon, specifically affecting versions 3.2.7 and 3.3.0. The root cause lies in improper handling of attacker-controlled checksum lengths, referred to as s2length, within the rsync protocol implementation. Rsync uses checksums to verify data integrity during synchronization. The vulnerability arises when the constant MAX_DIGEST_LEN exceeds the fixed SUM_LENGTH of 16 bytes, allowing an attacker to write beyond the allocated bounds of the sum2 buffer. This out-of-bounds write can corrupt heap memory, potentially enabling remote code execution, denial of service, or other arbitrary code manipulation without requiring any authentication or user interaction. The CVSS v3.1 base score of 9.8 reflects the high severity, with an attack vector of network (AV:N), low attack complexity (AC:L), no privileges required (PR:N), no user interaction (UI:N), and full impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability (C:H/I:H/A:H). Although no known exploits are currently reported in the wild, the ease of exploitation and critical impact make this a significant threat to any environment running vulnerable rsync daemon versions. Rsync is widely used for file synchronization and backup across many Linux and Unix-based systems, often exposed on network services, increasing the risk surface for remote exploitation.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, this vulnerability poses a severe risk, especially for enterprises relying on rsync for backup, file replication, or system synchronization services. Successful exploitation could lead to full system compromise, data breaches, or disruption of critical services. Sectors such as finance, healthcare, government, and critical infrastructure that depend on secure and reliable data transfer could face operational outages and data integrity loss. The lack of authentication requirement means attackers can exploit this remotely without prior access, increasing the threat level. Additionally, organizations with rsync daemons exposed to the internet or within less-secured internal networks are particularly vulnerable. The potential for remote code execution could allow attackers to establish persistent footholds, move laterally, or exfiltrate sensitive data, impacting confidentiality and compliance with European data protection regulations such as GDPR.
Mitigation Recommendations
Immediate mitigation involves upgrading rsync to a patched version once available from trusted sources or vendors. Until patches are released, organizations should restrict network exposure of rsync daemons by implementing strict firewall rules to limit access only to trusted hosts and networks. Employ network segmentation to isolate backup and synchronization services. Monitoring network traffic for unusual rsync activity and enabling intrusion detection systems with signatures targeting anomalous checksum length usage can provide early warning. Additionally, consider disabling rsync daemons on systems where it is not essential. For critical systems, deploying application-layer proxies or VPNs to control and encrypt rsync traffic can reduce attack surface. Regularly auditing and hardening configurations, including limiting user permissions for rsync processes, will further reduce risk. Organizations should also prepare incident response plans to quickly address potential exploitation attempts.
For access to advanced analysis and higher rate limits, contact root@offseq.com
Technical Details
- Data Version
- 5.1
- Assigner Short Name
- redhat
- Date Reserved
- 2024-12-03T08:57:42.580Z
- Cisa Enriched
- true
- Cvss Version
- 3.1
- State
- PUBLISHED
Threat ID: 682f0c680acd01a249259513
Added to database: 5/22/2025, 11:37:12 AM
Last enriched: 7/7/2025, 10:58:47 AM
Last updated: 8/9/2025, 10:16:51 AM
Views: 17
Related Threats
CVE-2025-9093: Improper Export of Android Application Components in BuzzFeed App
MediumCVE-2025-9091: Hard-coded Credentials in Tenda AC20
LowCVE-2025-9090: Command Injection in Tenda AC20
MediumCVE-2025-9092: CWE-400 Uncontrolled Resource Consumption in Legion of the Bouncy Castle Inc. Bouncy Castle for Java - BC-FJA 2.1.0
LowCVE-2025-9089: Stack-based Buffer Overflow in Tenda AC20
HighActions
Updates to AI analysis are available only with a Pro account. Contact root@offseq.com for access.
Need enhanced features?
Contact root@offseq.com for Pro access with improved analysis and higher rate limits.