CVE-2024-12111: OpenText Privileged Access Manager · Command Injection
Affects OpenText Privileged Access ManagerSource CVE Database V5
Not known to be exploited · CVSS 8.0 High.
Data as of 25 Oct 2026, 19:02 UTC
- EPSS
- 0.3% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 31% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:HExploitation evidence
Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 19 Dec 2024
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors
A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 2026-10-25.
What to do
AI-suggested
1. Monitor OpenText communications closely for official patches and apply them immediately upon release to remediate the vulnerability. 2. Until patches are available, restrict LDAP user permissions to the minimum necessary, limiting the ability to perform injection attacks during authentication. 3. Implement strict input validation and sanitization controls on LDAP inputs where possible, potentially via network-level filtering or application-layer proxies. 4. Enhance logging and monitoring of authentication attempts, focusing on anomalous LDAP queries or unusual command patterns indicative of injection attempts. 5. Conduct regular security audits and penetration testing targeting privileged access management systems to identify potential exploitation vectors. 6. Employ network segmentation to isolate PAM servers from less trusted network segments, reducing exposure to potential attackers. 7. Educate administrators and security teams about this vulnerability to ensure rapid detection and response to suspicious activity. 8. Consider deploying Web Application Firewalls (WAFs) or Intrusion Prevention Systems (IPS) with custom rules to detect and block command injection patterns related to LDAP authentication. 9. Review and tighten overall privileged access policies to minimize the attack surface and enforce multi-factor authentication where possible to add layers of defense.
Description
In a specific scenario a LDAP user can abuse the authentication process using injection attack in OpenText Privileged Access Manager that allows authentication bypass. This issue affects Privileged Access Manager version 23.3(4.4); 24.3(4.5)