CVE-2024-1559: CWE-79 Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') in jackdewey Link Library
The Link Library plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the 'll_reciprocal' parameter in all versions up to, and including, 7.6 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page.
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
CVE-2024-1559 is a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability identified in the Link Library plugin for WordPress, developed by jackdewey. This vulnerability affects all versions up to and including 7.6. The root cause is insufficient sanitization and escaping of the 'll_reciprocal' parameter, which is used during web page generation. Because the input is not properly neutralized, an attacker can inject arbitrary JavaScript code that is stored persistently within the plugin's data and executed in the browsers of any users who visit the affected pages. The vulnerability does not require any authentication or user interaction, making it easier for attackers to exploit remotely. The CVSS 3.1 base score is 6.5, reflecting a medium severity with network attack vector, low attack complexity, no privileges required, and no user interaction needed. The impact primarily affects confidentiality and integrity by enabling script execution that can steal cookies, perform actions on behalf of users, or manipulate page content. No patches or official fixes were linked at the time of reporting, and no known exploits have been observed in the wild. The vulnerability is classified under CWE-79, which covers improper neutralization of input leading to cross-site scripting. Given the widespread use of WordPress and the popularity of plugins like Link Library, this vulnerability poses a notable risk to websites using this plugin.
Potential Impact
The primary impact of CVE-2024-1559 is the potential compromise of user confidentiality and integrity on affected WordPress sites. Exploitation allows attackers to execute arbitrary JavaScript in the context of the victim's browser, which can lead to theft of session cookies, credentials, or other sensitive information. Attackers can also perform actions on behalf of users, such as changing settings or posting malicious content, potentially damaging the website's reputation and user trust. Although availability is not directly impacted, the indirect effects such as defacement or injection of malicious content can disrupt normal site operations and user experience. Because the vulnerability is exploitable without authentication or user interaction, it increases the attack surface and risk of automated exploitation attempts. Organizations relying on the Link Library plugin for content management or linking may face increased risk of targeted or opportunistic attacks, especially if they have high traffic or sensitive user bases. The lack of known exploits in the wild suggests limited current active exploitation, but the vulnerability's characteristics make it a candidate for future attacks if unmitigated.
Mitigation Recommendations
To mitigate CVE-2024-1559, organizations should first check for and apply any available updates or patches from the plugin vendor once released. In the absence of an official patch, administrators should consider temporarily disabling the Link Library plugin or removing the vulnerable 'll_reciprocal' parameter usage from their sites. Implementing a Web Application Firewall (WAF) with rules to detect and block malicious input patterns targeting the 'll_reciprocal' parameter can reduce risk. Site owners should also audit and sanitize existing content that may contain injected scripts. Employing Content Security Policy (CSP) headers can help limit the impact of injected scripts by restricting script execution sources. Regularly scanning the website for XSS vulnerabilities and monitoring logs for suspicious activity related to the plugin is recommended. Educating site administrators about the risks of stored XSS and enforcing secure coding practices for any customizations involving user input will further reduce exposure. Finally, maintaining a robust backup and incident response plan ensures rapid recovery if exploitation occurs.
Affected Countries
United States, India, Brazil, Germany, United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, France, Japan, Netherlands, Italy, Spain
CVE-2024-1559: CWE-79 Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') in jackdewey Link Library
Description
The Link Library plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the 'll_reciprocal' parameter in all versions up to, and including, 7.6 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page.
AI-Powered Analysis
Machine-generated threat intelligence
Technical Analysis
CVE-2024-1559 is a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability identified in the Link Library plugin for WordPress, developed by jackdewey. This vulnerability affects all versions up to and including 7.6. The root cause is insufficient sanitization and escaping of the 'll_reciprocal' parameter, which is used during web page generation. Because the input is not properly neutralized, an attacker can inject arbitrary JavaScript code that is stored persistently within the plugin's data and executed in the browsers of any users who visit the affected pages. The vulnerability does not require any authentication or user interaction, making it easier for attackers to exploit remotely. The CVSS 3.1 base score is 6.5, reflecting a medium severity with network attack vector, low attack complexity, no privileges required, and no user interaction needed. The impact primarily affects confidentiality and integrity by enabling script execution that can steal cookies, perform actions on behalf of users, or manipulate page content. No patches or official fixes were linked at the time of reporting, and no known exploits have been observed in the wild. The vulnerability is classified under CWE-79, which covers improper neutralization of input leading to cross-site scripting. Given the widespread use of WordPress and the popularity of plugins like Link Library, this vulnerability poses a notable risk to websites using this plugin.
Potential Impact
The primary impact of CVE-2024-1559 is the potential compromise of user confidentiality and integrity on affected WordPress sites. Exploitation allows attackers to execute arbitrary JavaScript in the context of the victim's browser, which can lead to theft of session cookies, credentials, or other sensitive information. Attackers can also perform actions on behalf of users, such as changing settings or posting malicious content, potentially damaging the website's reputation and user trust. Although availability is not directly impacted, the indirect effects such as defacement or injection of malicious content can disrupt normal site operations and user experience. Because the vulnerability is exploitable without authentication or user interaction, it increases the attack surface and risk of automated exploitation attempts. Organizations relying on the Link Library plugin for content management or linking may face increased risk of targeted or opportunistic attacks, especially if they have high traffic or sensitive user bases. The lack of known exploits in the wild suggests limited current active exploitation, but the vulnerability's characteristics make it a candidate for future attacks if unmitigated.
Mitigation Recommendations
To mitigate CVE-2024-1559, organizations should first check for and apply any available updates or patches from the plugin vendor once released. In the absence of an official patch, administrators should consider temporarily disabling the Link Library plugin or removing the vulnerable 'll_reciprocal' parameter usage from their sites. Implementing a Web Application Firewall (WAF) with rules to detect and block malicious input patterns targeting the 'll_reciprocal' parameter can reduce risk. Site owners should also audit and sanitize existing content that may contain injected scripts. Employing Content Security Policy (CSP) headers can help limit the impact of injected scripts by restricting script execution sources. Regularly scanning the website for XSS vulnerabilities and monitoring logs for suspicious activity related to the plugin is recommended. Educating site administrators about the risks of stored XSS and enforcing secure coding practices for any customizations involving user input will further reduce exposure. Finally, maintaining a robust backup and incident response plan ensures rapid recovery if exploitation occurs.
Technical Details
- Data Version
- 5.1
- Assigner Short Name
- Wordfence
- Date Reserved
- 2024-02-15T18:59:46.595Z
- Cisa Enriched
- true
Threat ID: 682d9840c4522896dcbf104e
Added to database: 5/21/2025, 9:09:20 AM
Last enriched: 2/28/2026, 8:39:16 AM
Last updated: 3/25/2026, 4:47:56 AM
Views: 52
Community Reviews
0 reviewsCrowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.
Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.
Actions
Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.
Need more coverage?
Upgrade to Pro Console for AI refresh and higher limits.
For incident response and remediation, OffSeq services can help resolve threats faster.
Latest Threats
Check if your credentials are on the dark web
Instant breach scanning across billions of leaked records. Free tier available.