VulnerabilityPublished 18 Jan 2024Updated 2 Jun 2025

CVE-2024-22317: IBM App Connect Enterprise · Improper Restriction of Excessive Authentication Attempts

Affects IBM App Connect EnterpriseSource CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 9.1 Critical.

Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 14:05 UTC

CVSS 3.1 base score

9.1Critical

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 1.0% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 63% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Privileges Required: None
User Interaction: None
Scope: Unchanged
Confidentiality: High
Integrity: None
Availability: High

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable component is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed 'remotely exploitable' and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable component.
Privileges Required: None: The attacker is unauthorized prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files to carry out an attack.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without any interaction from any user.
Scope: Unchanged: An exploited vulnerability can only affect resources managed by the same security authority. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are either the same, or both are managed by the same security authority.
Confidentiality: High: There is total loss of confidentiality, resulting in all resources within the impacted component being divulged to the attacker. Alternatively, access to only some restricted information is obtained, but the disclosed information presents a direct, serious impact.
Integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the impacted component.
Availability: High: There is total loss of availability, resulting in the attacker being able to fully deny access to resources in the impacted component; this loss is either sustained (while the attacker continues to deliver the attack) or persistent (the condition persists even after the attack has completed). Alternatively, the attacker has the ability to deny some availability, but the loss of availability presents a direct, serious consequence to the impacted component (e.g., the attacker cannot disrupt existing connections, but can prevent new connections; the attacker can repeatedly exploit a vulnerability that, in each instance of a successful attack, leaks a only small amount of memory, but after repeated exploitation causes a service to become completely unavailable).

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v3.1 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 18 Jan 2024
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 26 Oct 2026.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC or the CVSS exploit maturity reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
IBM App Connect Enterprise	Affected =11.0.0.1 =12.0.1.0	Fixed in–

AI-suggested

To mitigate CVE-2024-22317, European organizations should immediately assess their deployment of IBM App Connect Enterprise and identify if any affected versions (11.0.0.1 through 11.0.0.24 and 12.0.1.0 through 12.0.11.0) are in use. In the interim, organizations should implement compensating controls such as: 1) Enforce network-level restrictions to limit access to the IBM App Connect Enterprise management interfaces to trusted IP addresses or VPNs. 2) Deploy Web Application Firewalls (WAFs) or Intrusion Prevention Systems (IPS) with rules to detect and block excessive authentication attempts or brute force patterns targeting the platform. 3) Enable and monitor detailed authentication logs to detect abnormal login attempts and trigger alerts for potential abuse. 4) Implement multi-factor authentication (MFA) if supported by the platform or surrounding infrastructure to reduce the risk of credential compromise. 5) Conduct regular security audits and penetration testing focused on authentication mechanisms to identify weaknesses. 6) Prepare incident response plans specifically addressing potential denial of service and data breach scenarios related to this vulnerability. These targeted measures will help reduce the attack surface and mitigate the risk until an official patch is released.

Description

IBM App Connect Enterprise 11.0.0.1 through 11.0.0.24 and 12.0.1.0 through 12.0.11.0 could allow a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information or cause a denial of service due to improper restriction of excessive authentication attempts. IBM X-Force ID: 279143.

Impact

For European organizations, the impact of CVE-2024-22317 can be significant. IBM App Connect Enterprise is commonly deployed in large enterprises, financial institutions, healthcare providers, and government agencies across Europe to facilitate critical business processes and data exchanges. Exploitation of this vulnerability could lead to unauthorized access to sensitive data, including personal data protected under GDPR, resulting in privacy breaches and regulatory penalties. Additionally, the potential for denial of service could disrupt essential integration services, causing operational downtime and impacting business continuity. Given the criticality of integration platforms in digital transformation and inter-system communications, this vulnerability could affect supply chains, customer service platforms, and internal workflows. The confidentiality impact is high, as attackers might extract sensitive information through repeated authentication attempts, while availability impact is also high due to possible service outages. The absence of required privileges or user interaction lowers the barrier for attackers, increasing the risk profile for European organizations that have deployed vulnerable versions of IBM App Connect Enterprise.

CWE-307Improper Restriction of Excessive Authentication Attempts (opens in a new tab)
Base weaknessOWASP Top 10 A07:2025: Authentication Failures (opens in a new tab)
The product does not implement sufficient measures to prevent multiple failed authentication attempts within a short time frame.
Architecture and Design
Common protection mechanisms include: Disconnecting the user after a small number of failed attempts; Implementing a timeout; Locking out a targeted account; Requiring a computational task on the user's part.
Architecture and Design · Libraries or Frameworks
Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid.
OWASP Cheat Sheets
Authentication (opens in a new tab)
Transport Layer Protection (opens in a new tab)
TLS Cipher String (opens in a new tab)
OWASP ASVS 4.0.3
V2.2.1 (opens in a new tab)
V2.8.5 (opens in a new tab)
V2.8.4 (opens in a new tab)
Attack patterns
Dictionary-based Password Attack (opens in a new tab)
Password Brute Forcing (opens in a new tab)
Password Spraying (opens in a new tab)
Credential Stuffing (opens in a new tab)
Use of Known Kerberos Credentials (opens in a new tab)
From MITRE CWE, MITRE CAPEC and OWASP (Top 10, OpenCRE).

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 3 Jul 2025, 16:10 UTC

WeaknessesCWE-307

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats